Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Ãß°£ÆÇ º¯¼ºÁúȯ°ú ôÃß°­ ÇùÂøÁõÀ» Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ ¸¸¼º¿äÅëȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ½ÃÇàÇÑ ´Ü¼ø °¨¾Ð¼ú°ú ÈĹæ°æÀ¯¿äÃßüÀ¶ÇÕ¼úÀÇ ÀÓ»óÀû ºñ±³ Clinical Comparison between Decompression and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Chronic Lower Back Pain Involving Degenerative Disc Disease and Spinal Stenosis

´ëÇѽŰæ¿Ü°úÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 27±Ç 2È£ p.153 ~ 158
°í°æö, ±Ç⿵,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
°í°æö (  ) 
ÀüÁÖ¿¹¼öº´¿ø ½Å°æ¿Ü°ú

±Ç⿵ ( Kwon Chang-Young ) 
ÀüÁÖ¿¹¼öº´¿ø ½Å°æ¿Ü°ú

Abstract

ÀúÀÚµéÀº 1992³â 1¿ùºÎÅÍ 1995³â 12¿ù±îÁö º»¿ø ½Å°æ¿Ü°ú¿¡ ÀÏ»ó»ýÈ°ÀÇ ÁöÀåÀ» ÁÖ´Â ¸¸¼º ¿äÅë ȯÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ´Ü¼ø°¨¾Ð¼úÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÑ ±º°ú ÈÄ¹æ °æÀ¯ ¿äÃßü À¶ÇÕ¼úÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÑ ±ºÀ» ÀÓ»óÀûÀ¸·Î ºñ±³ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
1) ±â°èÀû ÅëÁõÀÇ °æ°¨ Á¤µµ¿Í ÀÓ»óÀûÀÎ °á°ú°¡ ÈÄ¹æ °æÀ¯ ¿äÃßü À¶ÇÕ¼úÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÑ ±ºÀÌ ´Ü¼ø°¨¾Ð¼úÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÑ ±ºº¸´Ù ¿ì¼öÇÏ¿´´Ù.
2) ½Å°æÇÐÀû Áõ»ó°ú ÇÏÁö ¹æ»çÅëÀÇ È£ÀüÁ¤µµ´Â µÎ ±º°£ÀÇ Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­ º¸´Â ¹Ù¿Í °°ÀÌ Ãß°£ÆÇÀÇ º¯È­¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ¹ß»ýÇÏ´Â ¸¸¼º¿äÅëµµ ÈÄ¹æ °æÀ¯ ¿äÃßü À¶ÇÕ¼úÀÌ ´Ü¼ø°¨¾Ð¼úº¸´Ù ´õ¿í ´õ °æ°¨½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù°í »ç·áµÇ°í ´Ü¼ø°¨¾Ð¼úÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÑ È¯ÀÚµéÀº °è¼Ó ÃßÀû °üÂûÇÏ¿© ºÒ¾ÈÁ¤¼ºÀÇ ¹ß»ý À¯¹«¿Í ôÃß°­ ÇùÂøÁõÀÇ ÃâÇö¿¡ ´õ¿í ¼¼½É ÇÑ Å½±¸°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇϸ®¶ó »ý°¢µÈ´Ù.

Between January 1992 and December 1995, 23 patients with chronic lower back pain involving lumbar disc degeneration and spinal stenosis underwent decompression and posterior lumbar interbody fusion, Two groups of patients were studied, and clinical symptoms, neurological signs and clinical results were compared, With regard to mechanical back pain and clinical results, posterior lumbar interbody fusion was superior to decompression, but as regards leg pain and neurologic signs, the two groups were similar. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion was of considerable benefit to patients with chronic lower back pain

Å°¿öµå

Chronic lower back pain; Lumber disc degeneration; Posterior lumbar interbody fusion; Decompression.

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KoreaMed
KAMS