Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±ØÀú¿Â ³Ãµ¿ º¸°üµÈ ÀÚ°¡°ñÆíÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ µÎ°³°ñ ¼ºÇü¼ú Autogenous Cranioplasty Using Deep-Freezing Bone Flap

´ëÇѽŰæ¿Ü°úÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 27±Ç 2È£ p.159 ~ 164
¼ÒÈ«¼·, ±èº¹·®, ÇÑÀ¯Á¤,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¼ÒÈ«¼· (  ) 
¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ½Å°æ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

±èº¹·® (  ) 
¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ½Å°æ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
ÇÑÀ¯Á¤ (  ) 
¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ½Å°æ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

°á·Ð
°ñÀºÇàÀ¸·Î ÀÌ¿ëµÇ°í ÀÖ´Â ¿µÇÏ 70¡ÉÀÇ ±ØÀú¿Â ³Ãµ¿°í¿¡ °³µÎ¼ú½Ã Á¦°ÅÇÑ ÀÚ°¡°ñÆíÀ» º¸
°üÇÏ¿© À̸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ µÎ°³°ñ ¼ºÇü¼úÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ¸¸Á·ÇÒ¸¸ÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.
¿°Áõ¼º ÇÕº´Áõ°ú Áö¿¬¼º °ñ Èí¼ö°¡ °¢°¢ 10%¿¡¼­ ¹ß»ýÇÏ¿´À¸³ª. ¹Ì¿ëÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î ¿ì¼öÇÏ°í.
¼ö¼ú½Ã°£ÀÌ ¸Å¿ì ª°í, ȯÀÚÀÇ Àü½Å»óÅ°¡ Çã¿ëÇÏ´Â ÇÑ Á¶±â µÎ°³°ñ ¼ºÇü¼úÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç,
ºñ¿ëÀÌ Àú·ÅÇÏ´Ù´Â ÀåÁ¡ÀÌ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
Every craniotomy requires immediate replacement of a fresh autograft of skull or, in
the presence of cerebral swelling, delayed cranioplasty. The use of artificial implant
materials for cranioplasty has been reported by many authors. Among them, acrylic
resin and titanium are most commonly used in neurosurgical practice ; however,
untoward complications such as infection and fluid collection appear at times.
In cases with a large bone defect we have been using autogenous bone flaps, which
was removed during the initial surgery, then preserved at -70¡É. Twenty cases of
cranioplasty with autogenous bone grafts stored in a deep-freezer are reviewed. Skull
sections removed aspectically at initial craniotomy were frozen and stored for 18 to 320
days(average 102 days) at -70¡É. At cranioplasty the pericranium was completely
removed, and the skull plate was immersed in antibiotic solution for one hour in room
temperature and fixed in skull defect site. The changes of replaced bone flaps were
studied by follow-up skull roentgenograms and radionuclide scintigraphy.
The results of follow-up for an average period of 14 months were satisfactory from
the standpoint of brain protection and cosmetic reconstruction. Delayed resorption of
grafted bone was observed in two cases. No serious complications were seen except in
two cases, whose bone flaps had to be removed due to and epidural abscess.
These results suggest that autogenous skull cranioplasty using deep freezing skull
plate offers several advantages : 1) the reconstruction contour is nearly same as
preoperative feature ; 2) operation time is much shorter than other methods ; 3) early
cranioplasty is possible as soon as patient's condition allows general anesthesia ; 4) cost
effective

Å°¿öµå

Deep freezing; Autogenous cranioplasty;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KoreaMed
KAMS