Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Á¦ 1 õÃßü¿¡ ÀüÃø¹æÀ¸·Î ³ª»ç¸ø °íÁ¤½ÃÀÇ ÇغÎÇÐÀû ¾ÈÀüÁö¿ª¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀçÆò°¡ Anatomical Safe Zone of Sacral Ala for Ventrolateral Sacral(S1) Screw Placement : Re-evaluation of Its Effectiveness

´ëÇѽŰæ¿Ü°úÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 27±Ç 3È£ p.291 ~ 298
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
µµÀç¿ø/Jae Won Doh EdwardC.Benzel/ÀÌ°æ¼®/¹èÇÐÀº/À±ÀϱÔ/ÃÖ¼ø°ü/º¯¹ÚÀå/Edward C. Benzol/Kyung Suck Lee/Hak Eun Bae/Il Kyu Yoon/Soon Kwan Choi/Park Jang Byun

Abstract

°á·Ð
1) õ°ñ³¯°³»À¸¦ ¾ÈÀüÇÏ°Ô °üÅëÇÏ´Â ³ª»ç¸øÀÇ ¾ÈÀü°¢µµ°¡ 33.5¡Æ¡¾9.3¿´À¸³ª ¾ÈÀü°¢µµÀÇ ¹ü
À§°¡ ÃÖÀú 20¡Æ¿¡¼­ ÃÖ°í 50¡Æ±îÁö·Î ÆíÂ÷°¡ ½ÉÇÏ¿© ½ÇÁ¦ ¼ö¼ú½Ã¿¡ ÀÌ ¾ÈÀü°¢µµ¸¦ ÀÏ·üÀûÀ¸
·Î »ç¿ëÇϱâ´Â ¾î·Á¿ì¸ç ¼ö¼úÀü¿¡ ¸ðµç ȯÀÚ¿¡°Ô CT¸¦ ÇÏ¿© ³ª»ç¸øÀÇ °¢µµ¿Í ±íÀ̸¦ °³º°
È­ÇÏ¿© Àû¿ëÇÔÀÌ ÁÁÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù
2) ¾ÈÀüÁö¿ªÀ» °üÅëÇÑ K-wireÀÇ ³¡¿¡¼­ºÎÅÍ ¿äõ°ñ½Å°æÃÑ, õÀå°üÀý±îÁöÀÇ °Å¸®´Â °¢°¢
6.8mm¡¾1(6¡­9.5), 4.8mm¡¾1(4¡­7.5)·Î °Å¸®°¡ ª¾Ò´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ Ãµ°ñ³¯°³»ÀÀÇ ¾ÕÂÊ Ç¥ÇöÀ¸·ÎºÎ
ÅÍ ³»Àå°ñÁ¤¸Æ±îÁöÀÇ °Å¸®°¡ 2.1mm¡¾1.7(0¡­5)¿´°í, ¿äõ°ñ½Å°æÃѱîÁö´Â 0mm·Î ¸ðµÎ õ°ñ
Ç¥¸é¿¡ ºÙ¾î ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ±¸Á¶¹°µéÀº ³ª»ç¸ø°íÁ¤½Ã¿¡ ´ÙÄ¥ À§ÇèÀÌ ÀÖÀ¸¹Ç·Î ÁÖÀǸ¦ ¿äÇÑ
´Ù
3) º» ¿¬±¸ °á°ú·Î º¼ ¶§ õ°ñ³¯°³ ¾ÕÂÊÀÇ ÇغÎÇÐÀû ¾ÈÀü Áö¿ªÀº ³ª»ç¸ø°íÁ¤½Ã¿¡ Àý´ë ¾ÈÀü
ÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. ±×·¯¹Ç·Î õ°ñ³¯°³»À¸¦ °üÅëÇÏ´Â ³ª»ç¸ø°íÁ¤À» ÇÒ ¶§¿¡´Â ÇÕº´ÁõÀ» ¸·±â À§ÇØ
¼­ ¼ö¼úÁß¿¡ ³ª»ç¸øÀÇ °¢µµ¿Í ±æÀ̸¦ Á¤È®È÷ ÃøÁ¤ÇÒ Àִ ôÃßÁ¤À§±â±¸ÀÇ µµ¿òÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÒ °Í
À¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ±â±¸ÀÇ ÀÌ¿ëÀÌ ºÒ°¡´ÉÇϸé Àü¹æ°íÁ¤¼úÀ̳ª °¥°í¸®(hook)°íÁ¤¼úµî ´Ù
¸¥ ¼ö¼ú¹æ¹ýÀ» °í·ÁÇÒ ÇÊ¿ä°¡ ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù
#ÃÊ·Ï#
Among the various sacral fixation technique used to enhance the strength of fixation.
S1 screw placement in the sacrum is the most common method. Ventrolateral S1 screw
placement through the sacral ala has been used alone or in combination with a
medially-directed screw in the S1 pedicle to enhance pull-out resistance. Although the
anatomical safe zone was identified, there is a risk of neurovascular injury particularly
when the enhancement of fixation strength requires bicortical purchase. The purpose of
this cadaver study is to re-evaluate the previous anatomical safe zone with using an S1
screw laterally directed toward the sacral ala. After dissecting the lateral safe xone of
sacral ala in 12 human cadavers. K-wires were intentionally inserted deep into this
zone. Each 'safe' angle to the center of the safe zone was measured and the degree of
risk to neurovascular structures was recorded on the basis of the distance in millimeters
from the tips of the penetrating K-wires.
The results are as follows ; the mean safe angle to the center of the anatomical safe
zone was 33.5¡Æ¡¾9.3(20-50). Between 20 and 50 degrees, the range of safe angle was
too wide. The distance between the tip of the K-wire and the sacroiliac joint,
lumbosacral trunk, obturator nerve was 4.8mm¡¾1(4-7.5), 6.8mm¡¾196-9.5) and 6.8mm¡¾
3.2(0-10) respectively, while the anterior height between sacral cortex and lumbosacral
trunk, internal iliac vein was 0mm and 2.1mm¡¾1.8(0-5) respectively. In 29% of cases,
the iliolumbar artery, the first branch of the internal iliac artery, abnormally crossed the
middle of the safe zone. The sacroiliac joint, lumbosacral trunk, internal iliac vein and
iliolumbar artery were at risk from laterally-directed S1 screws.
The study shows that bicortical placement of S1 screws into the sacral presents
unnecessary risks to neurovascular structures. It is concluded that the previous
anatomical safe zone for bicoritcal S1 screw placement into the sacral ala was not
surgically safe, and when lumbosacral fixation surgery is planned, operative techniques
other than bicortical screw placement should be considered.

Å°¿öµå

Sacral screw fixation; Ventrolateral direction; Bicortical purchase; Anatomical safe zone.;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KoreaMed
KAMS