Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¼ö¼úÀûÀ¸·Î Ä¡·áÇÑ ÆÄ¿­¼º ³úµ¿¸Æ·ù 1500¿¹ÀÇ ¼ö¼ú°á°ú ºÐ¼® An Analysis of Follow up Results of 1500 Intracranial Ruptured Aneurysms with Surgery

´ëÇѽŰæ¿Ü°úÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 27±Ç 3È£ p.309 ~ 314
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÃÖâ¶ô/Chang Rak Choi ³ªÇü±Õ/ÀÌ°æÁø/¹ÚÇØ°ü/¹Ú¼ºÂù/Hyoung Kyun Rha/Kyoung Jin Lee/Hae Kwan Park/Sung Chan Park

Abstract

°á·Ð
ÀÌ»ó°ú °°ÀÌ º» ±³½Ç¿¡¼­ Áö³­ 17³â µ¿¾È ³úµ¿¸Æ·ù ¼ö¼ú ½ÃÇàÇÑ 1500¿¹ÀÇ °á°ú¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÑ
°á°ú ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·Ð ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
ù° ¼ö¼úÀü good gladeÇÑÀڵ鿡¼­³ª ³ú½ÇÁú Ç÷Á¾À» µ¿¹ÝÇÏ¿© ÀÀ±Þ ¼ö¼úÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ È¯ÀÚ
µé¿¡¼­´Â Á¶±â¼ö¼úÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇϸ®¶ó »ý°¢µÇ³ª ¼ö¼úÀü poor gladeȯÀڵ鿡¼­´Â Á¶±â ¼ö¼úÀÌ ¿À
È÷·Á Ãʱ⠼ö¼ú¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Á÷Á¢ÀûÀÎ ³ú¼Õ»ó ´õ¿í ¾ÇÈ­½Ãų ¼ö Àֱ⠶§¹®¿¡ Áö¿¬¼ö¼úÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÏ
´Â °ÍÀÌ ÁÁÀ¸¸®¶ó »ý°¢µÈ´Ù.
µÑ°, poor gradeȯÀڵ鿡 Ưº°ÇÑ °ü½ÉÀ» °®°í Àû±ØÀûÀÎ Ãʱâ Ä¡·á ¹× Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ ÀçÈ° Ä¡
·á·Î À̵é gradeÇÑÀڵ鿡¼­ Ä¡·á °á°ú¸¦ ³ôÀδÙ.
¼Â°, Áö¿¬¼º ³úÇãÇ÷¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Àû±ØÀûÀÎ °ü½É ¹× ¿¹¹æÀû Ä¡·á·Î Ç÷°ü ¿¬ÃàÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇÑ ÈÄÀ¯Áõ
À» ÁÙ¿© ¼ö¼ú °á°ú¸¦ Çâ»ó½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The surgical results of 1500 patients with intracranial aneurysms operated in the
neurosurgical department of our university hospital during the 17 year period from 1978
to 1994 were analysed with regard to the preoperative neurological status, preoperative
CT findings and timing of surgical intervention. On the follow up examinations taken
between S months 4o 9 years alter operations, 1115 patients(743%) were classified as
those haying a good recovery, but 905 patients(13.7%) and 88 patients(5.9%) suffered
some morbidity(fair and poor outcome respectively), and 91 patients(6.l%) died Surgical
results for the patients with good neurological status at admission were rally good ;
good outcome for the patients with Hunt and Hess grade 1 was 87 8% and that for
those with grade 2 was 80.9% while it was 29.6% and 4 7% for patients with grade 4
and 5 respectively. There was no difference the rate of good outcome between early(0
to 3 days after bleeding) and late surgery(14 days or more after arachnoid hemorrhage)
groups if poor graded cases were excluded from the early surgery group Outcome was
worse if the surgery was performed during the period between 4th and l0th days after
initial bleeding The major causes of unfavorable outcome(poor and dead) were initial
hemorrhagic insults and delayed ischemic deficits For further improvement of the overall
surgical outcome, several factors must be concerned First early surgical outcome, several
factors must be concerned. First, early surgical intervention is recommended in good
grade patients on admission but it should probable be delayed in patients with poor
grades, Second. Active management of poor grade patients should be scrutinized. Third,
incidence of delayed ischemia may be lowered with positive consideration and preventive
treatment towards vasospasm.

Å°¿öµå

Intracranial aneurysm; Timing of surgical intervention; Outcome; Hunt and Hess grade.;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KoreaMed
KAMS