Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

°æÃß¼ö¼úÀÇ °ñÀÌ½Ä Àç·á·Î¼­ Àå°ñ°ú Biocompatible Orthopaedic Polymer(BOP)¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Æò°¡ The Evaluation of the llium and Biocompatible Orthopaedic Polymer(BOP) as Graft Material in Cervical Spine Surgery

´ëÇѽŰæ¿Ü°úÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 27±Ç 6È£ p.800 ~ 807
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
½Å¿øÇÑ/Won-Han Shin ¹ÚÁø±Ô/±è¹üÅÂ/ÃÖ¼ø°ü/º¯¹ÚÀå/Jin-Kyu Park/Bum-Tae Kim/Soon-Kwan Choi/Bark-Jang Byun

Abstract

°á ·Ð
ÀúÀÚµéÀº °æÃßÁõ°ú °æÃß¼Õ»ó ȯÀÚ 111¸í¿¡¼­ Àå°ñ ¶Ç´Â BOP¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Àü¹æ°æÀ¯¹ýÀ¸·Î
Ãßü°£ À¶ÇÕ¼úÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´°í, ¼ö¼úÈÄ¿Í ÃßÀû½Ã ¹æ»ç¼± °Ë»ç¼Ò°ß, ÇÕº´Áõ°ú ÃßÀû½Ã Áõ»ó È£Àü
ÀÇ Á¤µµ µîÀ» Á¶»çºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿©¼­ ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1) ÀÓ»óÁõ»óÀÇ È£ÀüÀ²Àº Àå°ñ°ú BOP¿¡¼­ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù.
2) ÃßÀû½Ã À̽İñÀÇ ³ôÀÌ´Â Àå°ñ¿¡¼­´Â ºñ±³Àû À¯ÁöµÇÁö¸¸ BOP¿¡¼­ ¾à Àý¹Ý ³ôÀÌ·Î °¨¼Ò
µÇ¾ú´Ù.
3) À̽İñÀÇ À¶ÇÕ ±â°£Àº Àå°ñ¿¡¼­ BOPº¸´Ù 3¹è°¡·® ª¾Ò´Ù.
4) °ñÀ̽ÄÀÇ ÇÕº´ÁõÀÇ ¹ß»ýÀº Àå°ñ¿¡¼­ BOPº¸´Ù Àû¾ú´Ù. Àç¼ö¼úÀº Àå°ñ 1¿¹¿¡¼­ Àå°ñ°ß
¿­°ñÀý·Î ö»ç°íÁ¤¼ú ±×¸®°í BOP 1¿¹¿¡¼­ µ¹Ãâ·Î Àç¼ö¼úÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù.
ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°ú·Î º¸¾Æ Àü¹æ°æÀ¯¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ °æÃßü°£ À¶ÇÕ¼úÀÇ °ñÀÌ½Ä Àç·á·Î¼­ Àå°ñ°ú BOP
¸¦ ¾î´À °ÍÀ̳ª »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸³ª, °ñÀ¶ÇÕÀÇ °úÁ¤°ú Ãßü°£ ³ôÀÌ À¯Áö¸é¿¡¼­ Àå°ñÀÌ BOP
º¸´Ù ¿ì¼öÇÏ´Ù°í »ç·áµÈ´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
Teraditional anterior interbody with autograft has limitations such as graft collapse.
graft extrusion.pseudoarthrosis. and donor site morbidity. A short hospital stay reduced
donor site complications can be achieved by using synthetic graft materials such as
Biocompatible Orthopaedic Polymer(BOP).
A retrospective study to evaluate bone graft was carried out in a series of 111
patients in whom interbody fusions were performed forcervial spondvlosis and cervial
spine injury using anterior (modified Trans-Unco-Discal) apprach with autogenous ilium
or BOP between January 1988 and December 1994 at our hospital. The radiological
assessments were made between postoperative and follow-up X-ray findings. and the
postoperative clinical results and complications were statistically analyzed.
The major results were as follows : 1) Clinical results of spondylotic patients were
graded excellent in 57%, good in 32% and fair in 11% in ilium group, and excellent
65%, good 25%, fair 5% and poor 5% in BOP group. Clinical results patients with
cervical injury were graded excellent in 25%, good in 25%, fair in 25% and poor in 25%
in ilium group, and excellent 29%, good 21%, fair 29% and poor 21% in BOP group. As
to graft materials, there were no statistically significant differance in clinical
results(p=0.76, p=0.75) 2) Mean height of graft bone were13.0§® in ilium group and 10.0
§® in BOP group at postoperative X-ray findings, and 11.6§® in group and 6.1§® in BOP
group at follow-up x-ray findings. Incidence where the height of graft bone at
follow-up X-ray findings was less than 80% of immediately postoperative height were
7% in ilium group and 58% in BOP, and there was a statistically significant
difference(P<0.05). BOP sank into the adjacent end plate as compaared to ilium. 3) Mean
duration of period required for fusion was about 40 days in ilium group and 132 days in
BOP group with a statistically significant differance(p<0.01). 4) The rate of
complications related to bone graft was 16% ilium group and 30% in BOP group,
incidence of complications was higher in BOP than ilium group. but there was no
statistically significant difference(p=0.28).
According to the above results. clinical results we were not significantly different
between both graft materials, but ilium was superior to BOP as a good spacer with
maintenance of height of graft bone and good bony fusion.

Anterior interbody fusion; Cervical spondylosis Graft material; lilum; Biocompatible orthopaedic polymer(BOP).;

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KoreaMed
KAMS