Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

³ú°£ ±³Á¾ ºÐ·ù, Áõ½ÄÇüÅ ¹× ¿¹ÈÄ Brainstem Gliomas : Classification, Growth Patterns, and Prognosis

´ëÇѽŰæ¿Ü°úÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 27±Ç 7È£ p.883 ~ 889
À±º´¹Î, Àü»ó·æ, ¼Õ¹®ÁØ, ³ª¿µ½Å,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À±º´¹Î (  ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾Æ»êÀç´Ü

Àü»ó·æ (  ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾Æ»êÀç´Ü
¼Õ¹®ÁØ (  ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾Æ»êÀç´Ü
³ª¿µ½Å (  ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾Æ»êÀç´Ü

Abstract

¼­·Ð
³ú°£ ½Å°æ±³Á¾Àº ¼Ò¾Æ±â¿¡ ºñ±³Àû ÈçÈ÷ ¹ß»ýÇÏ´Â ³úÁ¾¾çÀ¸·Î º´¸®ÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î ´ëºÎºÐ ¾Ç¼º ±³
Á¾À» ³ªÅ¸³»¸ç, ¿¹ÈÄ°¡ ¸Å¿ì ºÒ·®ÇÑ ³úÁ¾¾çÀÌ´Ù. º¸´Ù ³ªÀº Ä¡·á °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò±â À§ÇÑ ³ë·ÂÀ¸·Î
¿©·¯ Ä¡·á¹æ¹ýµé°ú ¿¹ÈÄÀÎÀÚ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸°¡ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁ® ¿Ô´Ù.
ÃÖ±Ù Áø´Ü±â±âÀÇ ¹ßÀüÀ¸·Î ÀÌ Á¾¾çÀÇ Áõ½ÄÇüÅÂ, À§Ä¡, ħ¹ü ¹üÀ§¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¸é¹ÐÇÑ ¼úÀü °Ë»ç
·Î º¸´Ù Àû±ØÀûÀ¸·Î Ä¡·á¸¦ ÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ƯÈ÷, ³ú°£ºÎÀ§ÀÇ ¼ö¼ú±â¹ýÀÇ ¹ßÀüÀ¸·Î Áø´Ü ¸ñÀû ¶Ç
´Â Á¾¾çÀÇ Àý´ë¼¼Æ÷¼ö¸¦ °¨¼Ò½ÃÅ°´Â ÀûÃâ¼úÀÌ º¸´Ù ¸¹ÀÌ ½ÃÇàµÇ°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌ¿¡ º´ÇàÇÑ ¿©
·¯ °¡ÁöÀÇ º¸°­Ä¡·á°¡ °­Á¶µÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. º¸°­Ä¡·á·Î¼­ÀÇ ¹æ»ç¼± Ä¡·á´Â Á¾¾çÀÇ ºÐ·ù¿Í Á¶Á÷ÇÐ
ÀûÀÎ Áø´Ü¿¡ µû¶ó °í½ÄÀû ¹æ¹ý°ú ´ÙºÐÇÒ ¹æ½ÄÀ¸·Î ½ÃÇàµÇ°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ÃÖ±Ù¿¡´Â ´ÙºÐÇÒ ¹æ½Ä
ÀÇ ¹æ»ç¼± Ä¡·á°¡ ºÎ°¢µÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ±×¿ÜÀÇ ³ú°£ ½Å°æ±³Á¾ ȯÀÚÀÇ »ýÁ¸À²À» Çâ»ó½ÃÅ°±â À§ÇÑ
¿©·¯ °¡Áö Ä¡·á¹ý°ú ¿¹ÈÄÀÎÀڵ鿡 ´ëÇÏ¿© ´Ù°¢ÀûÀ¸·Î ¿¬±¸µÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù.
µû¶ó¼­, º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº ³ú°£ ±³Á¾ÀÇ Áõ½Ä ÇüÅ¿¡ µû¸¥ ºÐ·ù¿Í º´¸® Á¶Á÷¼Ò°ß°úÀÇ ¿¬°ü
¼ºÀ» ¿¬±¸ÇÏ¿© °¢°¢ÀÇ ºÐ·ùÇüÅ¿¡ µû¸¥ ÀûÀýÇÑ Ä¡·á ¹æÇâÀ» ¼³Á¤ÇÏ¿© Ä¡·á°á°ú¿Í ¿¹Èĸ¦ Çâ
»ó½ÃÅ°°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù. º» ±³½Ç¿¡¼­´Â Áö³­ ¾à 8³â°£ ³ú°£ ½Å°æ±³Á¾ 64¸íÀÇ È¯ÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÑ
ÀÓ»óÀû Ư¡, ºÐ·ù, Áõ½ÄÇüÅÂ, º´¸®¼Ò°ß°ú ¿¹ÈÄ¿¡ ´ëÇØ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿©, ¹®Çå °íÂû°ú ÇÔ²² º¸°íÇÏ´Â
¹ÙÀÌ´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
Brainstem glimas are common intracranial tumors in young age and have dismal
prognosis despite the advancc in diagnostic and treatment modalities. The purpose of
this study is to classify the brainstem gliomas by growth patterns and to correlate the
growth patterns with histological findings. With these results, we have studied further
to verify the prognostic factors in brainstem gliomas.
Sixty four patients with brainstem gliomas were treated between May, 1989 and
March. For the location of brainstem gliomas, 41 cases were in pons, 13 cases in
medulla, 8 cases in midbrain, and 2 disseminated cases. Operations were performed in 44
cases of these lesions which were focally enhanced type or had exophytic growth
patterns. Histological diagnoses were low grade gliomas in 22 cases and high grade
gliomas in 21 cases. Among them, radiotherapy was performed in 39 patients with
diffuse or disseminated type. Among operated patients, seven were treated with Gamma
Knife radiosurgery for focal residual lesion.
Diffuse types were more common in pons. Exophytic or focal types were common in
medulla and midbrain. High grade glioma was more common in diffuse type and low
grade glioma was common in exophytic or focal type. We concluded that the favorable
prognostic factors are long duration of symptoms(>2mos), exophytic type, low grade
glioma, and radiotherapy treatment.

Å°¿öµå

Brainstem glioma; Growth pattern; Pathology2 Radiotherapy; Prognostic factor;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KoreaMed
KAMS