Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÇÏÀ§ ¿äÃßü ¹æÃ⼺ °ñÁúÀÇ Ä¡·á Management of Burst Fractures of the Low Lumbar Vertebra(L)

´ëÇѽŰæ¿Ü°úÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 27±Ç 12È£ p.1659 ~ 1667
ÃÖÁ¤±æ, Á¶ÇÏ¿µ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÃÖÁ¤±æ (  ) 
Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±Çб³½Ç

Á¶ÇÏ¿µ (  ) 
Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ½Å°æ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

°á·Ð
ÀúÀÚµéÀº 14¸íÀÇ ÇÏ ¿äÃßü ¹æÃ⼺ °ñÀý ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ º¸Á¸Àû Ä¡·á ¹× ¼ö¼úÀû Ä¡·á¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÏ
¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°ÀÌ ¿ä¾àÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.
1) ÇÏ ¿äÃßüÀÇ ¹æÃ⼺ °ñÀýÀº Æò±Õ 36.8¼¼·Î ºñ±³Àû ÀþÀº ³ªÀÌ¿¡ ¹ß»ýÇÏ¿´´Ù.
2) Ãʱ⠽ŰæÇÐÀû ¼Õ»óÀÌ ¾ø°Å³ª °æ¹ÌÇÏ°í, ôÃßü ³ôÀÌ ¹× ôÃß°üÀÇ ¼Ò½ÇÀÌ °æ¹ÌÇÑ °æ¿ì¿¡
´Â º¸Á¸Àû Ä¡·á·Îµµ ÁÁÀº °á°ú¸¦ ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.
3) ¼ö¼úÀ» ¿äÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì ÇϺΠ¿äÃßÀÇ Àü Ãø¹æ µµ´Þ¹ýÀº º¹±ÙÀ̳ª ¿ä±Ù, Àå°ñ ´É, Àå°ñ ±Ù µî
À¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ¼ö¼ú ¾ß°¡ ±í¾î ¼ö¼ú¼ö±â¿¡ ¾î·Á¿òÀÌ ÀÖ°í. ÀÌµé ±¸Á¶¹°µé¿¡ ¼Õ»óÀ» ÁÖ¾î ¼ú ÈÄ
ÇÏÁö °Å»ó Àå¾Ö³ª ¼ö¼úºÎÀ§ µ¿ÅëÀ» À¯¹ßÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.
4) ÇϺΠ¿äÃßÀÇ ¹æÃ⼺ °ñÀý·Î ÀÎÇØ ½Å°æ°ü³»·Î ½ÉÇÏ°Ô µ¹ÃâµÈ Ãßü°ñÀÇ °¨¾Ð¼úÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ
°æ¿ì °æº¹¸· µµ´Þ¹ýÀ¸·Î Á¢±ÙÇÏ¸é º´¼ÒºÎ¸¦ Á÷Á¢ º¸¸é¼­ °¨¾Ð ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°í, ºÒÇÊ¿äÇÑ ÈÄÁÖ
¼Õ»óÀ» ÇÇÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, 2Â÷·Î ÈÄ¹æ °æÀ¯ ôÃß°æ ³ª»ç ¸ø °íÁ¤¼ú ¹× ÈÄ¹æ °ñ À¯ÇÕ¼úÀ» ½ÃÇà
ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ôÃßÀÇ °ß°íÇÑ ¾ÈÁ¤¼ºÀ» Á¦°øÇÏ¿© Á¶±â º¸ÇàÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÏ´Ù.
5) ÇÏÀ§ ¿äÃßü´Â Å©°í, ³Ð±â ¶§¹®¿¡ º´¼ÒºÎ Á¦°Å ÈÄ Ãßü°£ À¯ÇÕ¿¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ ÃæºÐÇÑ Å©±âÀÇ
À̽İñÀ» äÃëÇϱ⠾î·Æ°í, °ñ À̽ĸ¸ ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´À» °æ¿ì¿¡´Â ÃßÈÄ ÀÌ½Ä °ñÀÇ ÇãÅ»À̳ª ¿äÃß
Àü¸¸ ¼Ò½ÇÀ» °¡Á®¿Ã ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¹Ç·Î Mesh cage¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Ãßü°£ À¯ÇÕ¼úÀÌ ¿ëÀÌÇÏ°í ÀÌ½Ä °ñ
ÇãÅ»¿¹¹æÀ̳ª ¿äÃß Àü¸¸µµ À¯Áö¿¡ À¯¸®ÇÏ´Ù.
6)ÇÏÀ§ ¿äÃßü ¹æÃ⼺ °ñÀý ½Ã Ÿ ºÎÀ§ ¼Õ»óÀÌ µ¿¹ÝµÇ´Â °æ¿ì°¡ ÀÖÀ¸¹Ç·Î µ¿¹Ý ¼Õ»ó À¯¹«¸¦
È®ÀÎÇÏ¿©¾ß ÇÑ´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
A retrospective review of 14 patients treated non-operatively or operatively for burst
fractures of the low lumbar spine between January 1992 and December 1997 was
performed. Burst fractures of the low lumbar spine are rare and have not been well
delineated in the literature. Average follow-up for fourteen patients was 10.6 months.
Ten patients were women. The average age at injury was 36.8 years(range 17-70years).
Seventy-one percent of the injuries were the result of fall from height and 29% were
the result of motor vehicle accidents.
Non-operatively treated six patients were presented with minimal canal compromise or
no initial neurological deficit. They were treated 4-6weeks of bed rest before they were
allowed to mobilize with orthosis. None of these patients had any significant
complications.
If patients showed neurological impairment associated with significant canal
compromise or vertebral height loss, they were treated operatively to restore spinal
stability and spinal height and also to decompress neural elements. Various types of
combined surgical approaches were used for eight patients who met these criteria.
Among these, two were treated in a staged fashion with the anterior transperitoneal
approach done initially. Vertebrectomy and complete neural decompression in direct
vision was possible and interbody fusion was performed using Mesh cage. Which was
filled with bone collected from sites of vertebrectomy.
This combined approach seems to be the choice of procedure for complete
decompression and interbody fusion of the low lumbar burst fracture with several canal
compromise and vertebral height loss. Transperitoneal approach for the low lumbar
vertebrectomy has advantage of less muscular damage compared to retroperitoneal
approach. The were on major complications from surgery in the present series.

Å°¿öµå

Burst fracture of the low lumbar spine; Anterior decompression Mesh cage@posterior instrumentation.;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KoreaMed
KAMS