Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿äÃß°£ÆÇ Å»ÃâÁõ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Àç¼ö¼úÀÇ ¿¹ÈÄÀÎÀÚ ºÐ¼® Clinical Analysis of Prognostic Factors Following Reoperation for Lumbar Disc Herniation

´ëÇѽŰæ¿Ü°úÇÐȸÁö 1999³â 28±Ç 1È£ p.68 ~ 74
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Á¦Á¾¹ü/Chong Bum Jae ±èżº/¹ÚÁ¾ÅÂ/ÀÓ¿µÁø/À̺À¾Ï/ÀÓ¾ð/±è±¹±â/Tae Sung Kim/Jong Tae Park/Young Jin Lim/Bong Arm Rhee/Won Leem/Gook Ki Kim

Abstract

°á·Ð
ÀúÀÚµéÀº ¿äÃß°£ÆÇ Å»ÃâÁõ¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© Àç¼ö¼úÀ» ½ÃÇà¹ÞÀº 52¸í ȯÀÚÀÇ ÀÓ»óºÐ¼® ¹× ÃßÀû Á¶
»ç¸¦ ÅëÇÏ¿© Àç¼ö¼ú ¼Ò°ß»ó °¡Àå ÈçÇÑ ¼Ò°ßÀº ôÃß°­ ÇùÂøÁõ(36.5%)À̾úÀ¸¸ç ÀÌ´Â Ãʱ⠼ö
¼ú½Ã¿¡ ¾ö°ÝÇÑ º´º¯ÀÇ È®ÀÎÈÄ¿¡ °üÀý¸é ¼Õ»óÀ» ÇÇÇϸ鼭 ÃæºÐÈ÷ Ãß°£°ø È®Àå¼úÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿©
¾ß µÉ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÈ´Ù. ´ÙÀ½À¸·Î ¸¹ÀÌ °üÂûµÇ¾ú´ø ¼Ò°ßÀº ½Å°æ±Ù ÁÖº¯ÀÇ ¼¶À¯È­¿Í ÇÔ²² ¼ö
ÇÙÀÌ ÀÜÁ¸ÇÏ¿´´ø °æ¿ì(34.6%)·Î¼­ Ãʱ⠼ö¼ú½Ã¿¡ À̸¦ ¿¹¹æÇÏ´Â ¹æÇâÀ¸·Î ¼ö¼úÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÑ´Ù
¸é ¿äÃß°£ÆÇ Å»ÃâÁõ ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ Ãʱ⠼ö¼úÈÄ ÅëÁõÀÌ Áö¼ÓµÇ´Â ȯÀÚ¸¦ ÁÙ¿© ¿äÃß°£ÆÇ ¼ö¼úÀÇ
°á°ú¸¦ Çâ»ó½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­¿Í °°ÀÌ ¼ö¼úÈÄ Áõ»óÀÌ Àç¹ßµÈ ȯÀÚ
µéÀÌ¶óµµ º´º¯ ºÎÀ§¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¤È®ÇÑ ÅëÁõÀÇ ¿øÀÎÀÌ ±Ô¸íµÈ´Ù¸é ÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀûÀýÇÑ ¼ö¼úÄ¡·á·Î
ÁÁÀº °á°ú¸¦ ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù°í »ç·áµÈ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª °í·ÉÀÇ È¯ÀÚ, Ãʱ⠼ö¼úÈÄ ¹«Áõ»ó ±â°£ÀÌ 6°³
¿ù ¹Ì¸¸À̾ú´ø ȯÀÚ, ¼ö¼úȽ¼ö°¡ ¸¹¾Ò´ø ȯÀÚ, ¼ö¼ú ¼Ò°ß»ó ½ÉÇÑ ½Å°æ±ÙÀÇ ¼¶À¯È­µîÀÌ ¹ß°ß
µÇ¾ú´ø ȯÀڵ¼­´Â º¸´Ù ¼¼½ÉÇÑ ÁÖÀǸ¦ ¿äÇÏ¸ç ´ëºÎºÐ ³ª»Û ¿¹ÈÄ¿Í °ü·ÃÀÌ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.
ƯÈ÷ º»±³½ÇÀÇ ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ÃÖ¼ÒÇÑÀÇ ÇǺÎÀý°³¸¦ ÅëÇÑ °æÇÇÀû ¼öÇÙÁ¦°Å¼úÀ̳ª ³»½Ã°æÀû ¼ö
ÇÙÁ¦°Å¼úÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÑÈÄ Àç¼ö¼úÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÑ È¯ÀÚµéÀÌ Àüü Àç¼ö¼ú ȯÀÚÁß 17.3%¸¦ Â÷ÁöÇÏ°í ÀÖ
¾úÀ¸¸ç À̵é ȯÀÚµéÀº Àç¼ö¼ú¼Ò°ß¿¡¼­ ôÃß°­ ÇùÂøÁõÀ̳ª ÀÜÁ¸ÇÏ´Â Ãß°£ÆÇÀÌ º¸¿´´ø °æ¿ì°¡
´ëºÎºÐÀ¸·Î¼­ ºñ·Ï À̵éÀÌ ÀüüȯÀÚ¿¡ ºñÇØ ¸¹Àº ¼ýÀÚ¸¦ Â÷ÁöÇÏÁö´Â ¾Ê¾ÒÀ¸³ª Ãʱ⠼ö¼ú½Ã
¿¡ º¸´Ù Á¤È®ÇÑ º´º¯ÀÇ ÀÌÇØ¿Í ÀûÀýÇÑ ¼ö¼ú ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¼±ÅÃÇÏ¿© Ãß°£ÆÇ Å»Ãâ ¼ö¼úÈÄ ½ÇÆи¦ ÁÙ
Àϼö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î º¸ÀÌ¸ç ¿äÃß°£ÆÇÅ»Ãâ ¼ö¼úÀÇ °á°ú¸¦ Çâ»ó ½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.

The surgical outcome of lumbar discectomy has improved with advance of surgical
technique and diagnostic equipment. But failed back surgery syndrome was still remains
to be elusive. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the possible causes for failure
of primary discectomy and prognostic factors which could influence the outcome of
reoperation in failed back surgery syndrome. The authors were able to follow up and
analyze 525 cases who underwent surgery due to herniated lumbar disc from May, 1994
to 1997 in our institution. Among these, fifty two patients were reoperated due to
recurrent disabling pain and neurological deficits.
The most common intraoperative findings of patients with reoperation were foraminal
stenosis(36.5£¥) followed by epidural fibrosis with remained disc materials(34.5£¥). These
patients had variable outcomes, especially those having infection, fibrotic adhesion, legal
problems, and psychiatric problems showed unfavorable outcomes.
In overall, 49.8£¥ of patients showed satisfactory results(good and excellent). Favorable
outcome could be obtained with a history of good results from previous operations, with
the absence of epidural fibrotic adhesion, with predominance of radicular pain, with
lesser frequency of operative procedure, with more than 6 months of symptom duration
after primary operation. Morever, most common initial operative method was hemipartial
laminectomy, but 17.3£¥ of patient with reoperation had histories of percutaneous
endoscopic decompressive surgery. Intraoperative findings of these patients showed
spinal stenosis or remained disc materials. Although theses number of patients was
small for total number of patients. These operative findings suggest that the choice of
initial operative method seemed to be important factor influencing the postoperative
results. As mentioned above, there are many factors influencing the outcome in lumbar
disc herniation operation. Prevention of epidural fibrosis and proper selection of surgical
technique in primary operation should be considered as important factor obtaining the
better outcome.

Å°¿öµå

Reoperation; Failed back surgery syndrome; Prognostic factors;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KoreaMed
KAMS