Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Programmable Shunt Device¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ³úô¼ö¾× ´Ü¶ô¼úÀÇ ÀÓ»óÀû ºÐ¼® A Clinical Analysis of the Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt with Programmable Shunt Divice

´ëÇѽŰæ¿Ü°úÇÐȸÁö 1999³â 28±Ç 1È£ p.75 ~ 81
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÇÑ¿µ¹Î/Young Min Han À¯µµ¼º/±è´Þ¼ö/ÇãÇÊ¿ì/Á¶°æ¼®/°­Áرâ/Do Sung Yoo/Dal Soo Kim/Phil Woo Huh/Kyung Suck Cho/Jun Ki Kang

Abstract

°á·Ð
1) Programmable Shunt device¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ³úô¼ö¾× ±³Åë¼úÀº ¼ÇÆ®¼ö¼úÈÄ °ú´Ù ¹è¾×, °ú¼Ò
¹è¾×À¸·Î ÃÊ·¡µÉ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â Àç¼ö¼úÀ» ÁÙÀÏ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.
2) ¼ºÀο¡¼­ ¹ß»ýÇÑ ¼öµÎÁõÀÇ °æ¿ì ¿øÀο¡ µû¶ó ´Ù¼Ò Â÷ÀÌ´Â ÀÖÀ¸³ª ÀûÁ¤ Æò±Õ ¾Ð·ÂÀº
97.4¡¾ 17.4§®H2O·Î, programmable shunt device¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¼ÇÆ® ¼ö¼ú½Ã Ãʱâ
¾Ð·ÂÀ» 100§®H2O·Î ¼³Á¤ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ¾ÈÀüÇϸ®¶ó »ç·áµÈ´Ù.
3) Programmable shunt device´Â ¾Ð·Â Á¶ÀýÀÌ ¿ëÀÌÇÏ¿©, ȯÀÚÀÇ Á¶±â È°µ¿ÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÏ°í
¿Ü·¡¿¡¼­µµ ½Å°æÇÐÀû Áõ»ó°ú CT°Ë»ç ÈÄ ¾Ð·Â Á¶ÀýÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÏ¿´´Ù
4) Programmable shunt device¸¦ ¼Ò¾Æ¿¡¼­ »ç¿ëÇÏ·Á¸é ºÎÇÇ°¡ Å« ¹ëºê ºÎÀ§¸¦ °³¼±ÇÏ°í,
anti-siphon effect°¡ Ãß°¡µÇ¾î¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
5) Programmable shunt device´Â MRI½ÃÇà½Ã ÀüÀÚ±â Á¶ÀýÀåÄ¡·Î ÀÎÇÑ Á¦ÇÑÁ¡°ú ¿µ»ó ÃÔ
¿µ½Ã Àΰø À½¿µ(artifact)ÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¹Ç·Î ÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÓ»ó ¿¬±¸°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
CSF shunting procedures are widely employed in the treatment of hydrocephalus and
other disturbances of the dynamics of CSF such as arachnoid cyst and syrinx. the
relative simplicity of this operation with respect to other neurosurgical procedures is
matched by a high incidence of complications. Many kinds of shunt devices have been
developed to reduce complications. Yet, this operation frequently requires surgical
revision. Traditional shunts were primarily designed to manage hydrocephalus by
regulating intracranial pressure. Those devices, in some circumstances, can cause to
underdrain or overdrain CSF and may need a surgical revision to adjust the pressure.
Authors have treated 28 patients with the disturbaces of CSF dynamics using
pressure adjustable valve system(Codman-Medos programmable Hakim valve system).
Two patients had arachnoid cysts and the others had hydrocephalus with various
etiologies. Subdural hygroma was developed in 5 patients and underdrainage was
observed in 9 patients on CT scan. By adjusting the pressure. Authors achieved clinical
improvements without a need for surgical revision. The optimum pressure was 97.4¡¾
17.4§®H2O for the patients with hydrocephalus with various etiologies in
adults.
In conclusion, the incidence of shunt revision by using this shunt device for the
treatment of hydrocephalus and arachnoid cysts was decreased.

Å°¿öµå

Hydrocephalus; Hygroma; Underdrain; Shunt revision; Pressure adjustable valve;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KoreaMed
KAMS