Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

°æÃß¼Õ»óȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ÀÇ ÀÓ»óÀû ºÐ¼®°ú Ä¡·áÀÇ °íÂû A Clinical Analysis and Treatment of Traumatic Cervical Spine Patients

´ëÇѽŰæ¿Ü°úÇÐȸÁö 1999³â 28±Ç 4È£ p.460 ~ 469
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è°æ¹ü/Gyoung Beom Kim ÃÖÈÞÁø/½ÅÇöö/±èÀͼö/±è±â¿í/ÇãÀçÅÃ/±èÇüµ¿/Hyu Jin Choi/Hyun Chul Shin/Ik Su Kim/Ki Uk Kim/Jae Taec Huh/Hyoung Dong Kim

Abstract

°á·Ð
º»¿ø ½Å°æ¿Ü°ú¿¡¼­ 1993³â 1¿ùºÎÅÍ 1997³â 12¿ù±îÁö °æÃߺΠ¿Ü»óÀ¸·Î ÀÔ¿øÄ¡·á ¹ÞÀº 90·Ê
ÀÇ È¯ÀÚ¸¦ ÀÓ»ó ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1) ¼ºº°·Î´Â 20´ëÀÇ ³²ÀÚ(28.9%)¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ¸¹¾Ò°í, ¿øÀÎÀ¸·Î´Â ±³Åë»ç°í°¡ 50·Ê (55.6%)·Î
°¡Àå ¸¹¾Ò´Ù.
2) °æÃß¼Õ»óÀ¸·Î ³»¿øÇÏ¸é ¸ÕÀú °ñ°ßÀμúÀ» ÅëÇØ Á¶±âÁ¤º¹ ¹× ô¼ö ½Å°æÀÇ ¾ÈÁ¤À» À¯ÁöÇØ
¾ß ÇÑ´Ù °æÃßüÀÇ ¼Õ»ó±âÀüÀº ¾Ð¹Ú¼º ±¼ÀýÀÌ 39%·Î °¡Àå ¸¹¾Ò°í(p<0.001). °æÃßüÀÇ ¼Õ»óÀº
Á¦2°æÃß¿¡¼­, ÃßüÀÇ ÀüÀ§´Â Á¦ 5-6°æÃß°£ ÀüÀ§°¡ °¡Àå ¸¹¾Ò´Ù.
3) 51¸íÀÇ È¯ÀÚ¿¡¼­ 76·Ê(84.4%)ÀÇ µ¿¹Ý¼Õ»óÀÌ ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç °æÃß¼Õ»ó½Ã µÎºÎ¼Õ»óÀÌ 26.3%·Î
°¡Àå ¸¹ÀÌ µ¿¹ÝµÇ¾ú´Ù.
4) Àüü °æÃß¼Õ»ó ȯÀÚÁß 10¸í(11.1%)ÀÌ »ç¸ÁÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç À̵éÁß Ãßü¼Õ»ó ÀÚü·Î ÀÎÇÑ È£Èí
°ï¶õÀ¸·Î »ç¸ÁÇÑ 2·Ê¸¦ Á¦¿ÜÇÑ 4·Ê¿¡¼­ Æó¿¡ ¹ß»ýÇÑ ÇÕº´ÁõÀ¸·Î »ç¸ÁÇÏ¿´´Ù.
5) ÃÑ 90·ÊÀÇ È¯ÀÚÁß 47·Ê¿¡¼­´Â °ñ°ßÀμú ¹× °æºÎ º¸Á¶±â, Halo °íÁ¤ÀåÄ¡ µîÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿©
Ä¡·áÇÏ¿´°í, ³ª¸ÓÁö 43·Ê¿¡¼­ Àü¹æÁ¢±Ù¹ý , ÈĹæÁ¢±Ù¹ý , ÈĹæÁ¢±Ù¹ý ÈÄ Àü¹æÁ¢±Ù¹ý µîÀÇ ¼ö
¼ú¿ä¹ýÀ» ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç °¢ ¼ö¼úÁ¢±Ù¹ý°£ÀÇ È£Àü·üÀ» ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´À» ¶§ °¢ ¼ö¼ú ÀûÀÀÁõÀÌ ´Ù¸¥
°í·Î ÀÓ»óÀû Àǹ̴ ¾øÀ¸¸®¶ó »ý°¢µÇ³ª Àü¹æÁ¢±Ù¹ý½Ã¿¡ ÈĹæÁ¢±Ù¹ýÀ̳ª ÈĹæÁ¢±Ù¹ýÈÄ Àü¹æ
Á¢±Ù¹ýÀ» ½ÃÇàÇßÀ» ¶§º¸´Ù ³ôÀº È£Àü·üÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ º¸Á¸Àû ¿ä¹ý°ú ¼ö¼úÀû ¿ä¹ýÀ» ºñ±³
ÇÏ¿´À» ¶§ º¸Á¸Àû ¿ä¹ýÀ» ÇÑ °æ¿ìº¸´Ù ¼ö¼ú¿ä¹ýÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´À» ¶§ ÁÁÀº °á°ú¸¦ º¸¿´À¸³ª
(p=0.019) ¼ö¼úÀûÀÀÁõÀÌ µÊ¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸ÇÏ°í ȯÀÚ»óÅ°¡ ³ªºü ¼ö¼úÀ» ÇÏÁö ¸øÇÑ °æ¿ìµµ Æ÷ÇÔµÇ
¾î À̵鰣ÀÇ ºñ±³°¡ Àǹ̰¡ ¾øÀ» °ÍÀ̸ç ÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÇØ ¼ö»óÈÄ Ãʱâ ÀÀ±Þóġ¸¦ ¾ÆÁÖ ÀûÀýÈ÷ ÇÏ
°í Ưº°È÷ Áö¿¬ ¼ö¼úÀ» ÇؾßÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì°¡ ¾Æ´Ï¸é ¿©·¯ °¡Áö ÇÕº´ÁõÀ» ¿¹¹æÇÏ°í Á¶±âÈ°µ¿À»
Çϱâ À§ÇØ Á¶±â¼ö¼úÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÇ¸ç º¸Á¸ÀûÀÎ Ä¡·á³ª ¼ö¼úÀüÀÇ °ñ°ßÀμú µîÀ¸·Î
¿À·£ ±â°£ÀÇ Àý´ë¾ÈÁ¤½Ã¿¡´Â »ç¸Á µîÀ» Æ÷ÇÔÇÏ´Â ÇÕº´Áõ µîÀ» ÁÙÀ̴µ¥ ÁÖÀÇÇØ¾ß ÇÏ°Ú´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The authors reviewed 90 patients with traumatic cervical spine injury admitted to our
department between January 1993 and December 1997.
The most common age group was 21-30 years old. The male to female radio was 7.2
: 1 Motor vehicle accident was the most frequent cause of traumatic cervical spine
injury. The most common mechanism of injury was compressive and then distractive
flexion. The C2 body fracture was the commonest of the vertebral body fractures and
C5/6 dislocation was the most common involved 1eve1 of injured vertebrae. Forty-seven
of these patients were managed with conservative treatment and the remaining 43
patients underwent surgery. The conservative treatment was consisted of skeletal
traction, neck collar and Halo-vest application. Of 43 patients operated, 24 patients were
performed by anterior approach and 10 by posterior approach and remaining 9 patients
were treated by anterior approach after posterior approach. According to Modified
Frankel's grading system, the rates of neurological improvement at anterior approach,
posterior approach and combined approach were 79.2%, 60.0% and 66.0%, respectively.
Difference of improvement rates did not have clinical significance. There were 76 types
of associated injuries were observed in 51 patients. The most common associated injury
was head trauma and surgical intervention was required in 5 patients among them. The
common complications were respiratory disorder, bed sore, urinary tract infection,
gastrointestinal bleeding, pin sits infection in decreasing order of frequency. The most
common cause of death was respiratory disorder including pneumonia, atelectasis, acute
respiratory distress syndrome and pulmonary edema.

Å°¿öµå

Traumatic cervical spine injury; Fracture and dislocation; Surgery; Complication; Death;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KoreaMed
KAMS