Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

³ú°æ¸·ÇÏ ³ó¾ç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÓ»ó°íÂû Clinical Review of Cerebral Subdural Empyema

´ëÇѽŰæ¿Ü°úÇÐȸÁö 1999³â 28±Ç 9È£ p.1337 ~ 1343
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è»óö/Sang Cheol Kim °­Àç±Ô/°í¿µ°ü/µµÁ¾¿õ/Jae Kyu Kang/Koh Young Kwan/Jong Oung Do

Abstract

°á·Ð
°æ¸·ÇÏ ³ó¾çÀº ÀÓ»óÀûÀ¸·Î ±Þ¼ÓÈ÷ ÁøÇàÇϹǷΠÁ¶±âÁø´Ü°ú ÀûÀýÇÑ Ä¡·á¸¦ ÇÏÁö ¸øÇßÀ» °æ
¿ì Ä¡¸íÀûÀÏ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ÃÖ±Ù Áø´Ü ¹æ¹ýÀÇ ¹ß´Þ ¹× Ç×»ýÁ¦ÀÇ ¹ß´Þ·Î °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù°í´Â ÇÏÁö¸¸
¾ÆÁ÷µµ 10¡­20%ÀÇ ³ôÀº »ç¸Á·üÀ» ±â·ÏÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â Áø´Ü°ú µ¿½Ã¿¡ ÀÀ±Þ ¹è³ó
¼úÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿© 8·Ê (80%)¿¡¼­ ÁÁÀº ¿¹Èĸ¦ º¸¿´´Ù. »ç¸ÁÇÑ È¯ÀÚ´Â ¾ø¾úÀ¸³ª, ¼ö¼úÈÄ 2·Ê
(20%)¿¡¼­ ½ÉÇÑ ÁßÁõ¹«´É·Â »óŸ¦ º¸¿´´Âµ¥ À̵é ȯÀÚ´Â ³»¿ø´ç½Ã ÀǽÄÀÌ ³ª»¦À¸¸ç, Áõ»ó
¹ßÇö ÈÄ Áø´Ü°ú ¼ö¼ú ¹× Ç×»ýÁ¦Åõ¿©°¡ Áö¿¬µÇ¾ú´Ù. ³ú°æ¸·ÇÏ ³ó¾ç¿¡¼­ ¹«¾ùº¸´Ùµµ Áß¿äÇÑ
°ÍÀº Á¶±âÁø´Ü°ú °³µÎ¼ú ¹× ÀûÀýÇÑ Ç×»ýÁ¦ ¿ä¹ýÀÌ´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
Objective : The purpose of this study was to review our experience with subdural
empyema. Clinical presentation, methods of diagnosis, results of microbiological tests,
typos of therapy, and outcome of patients are presented and compared with previous
reports
Methods : The study consists of 10 patients With subdural empyema treated from
January 1888 to December 1997. Clinical accords and radiologic studies were reviewed
retrospectively. The patient population consisted of 8 men and 2 women, whose ages
ranged from 12 to 65 years(mean 49.1 years). Diagnosis of subdural empyema was
confirmed with contrast-enhanced CT scanning or Gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging.
Seven patients received surgical treatments and three patients were treated with a
multiple antibiotics only.
Result : The subdural empyema have been found to occur most commonly after
paranasal sinusitis and postoperative infection in four cases respectively, otitis media and
mastoiditis in one case respectively. The organism were found to be staphylococci in
three cases, streptococci in two cases, anaerobic streptococci in one case, sterile in one
case, and unknown in three cases. Relative frequency of signs and symptoms revealed
fever in eight cases, headache in seven cases, vomiting in five cases, hemiparesis in
three cases. and epilepsy in two cases. The outcome was revealed good in eight cases,
poor in two cases.
Conclusion : Although subdural empyema is considered a bare condition, it constitutes
between 19 and 23 per cent of all intracranial infectin. It usually presents as a fulminant
clinical picture and rapid neurological deterioration. In this sense, it constitutes a true
neurosurgical emergency. Diagnosis of subdural empyema is best made by either CT
with contrast or by MRI. Both of these tests are also helpful in establishing the
presence or absence of sinusitis. Subesquently, surgery along with antibiotics help to
lower mortality rate Antibiotics therapy should be selected according to final culture
results and continued for 4 to 5 weeks. The general consensus is in favour of early
drainage to reduce the mortality and clinical deterioration. In our study. the overall
mortality rate was 0%, and 20% of patients had neurological deficiencies at the time of
discharge from the hospital. It is vary important for clinician to detect this condition
early to keep low mortality and morbidity.

Å°¿öµå

Subdural empyema; Brain CT; MRI; Early drainage;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KoreaMed
KAMS