Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÁßÇϺΠ°æÃß¼Õ»ó¿¡¼­ ÈÄ¹æ °æÃß ³»°íÁ¤¼ú ¹× °ñÀ¯ÇÕ¼úÀÇ ºÐ¼®°á°ú Analysis of Posterior Cervical Fixation and Fusion in Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury

´ëÇѽŰæ¿Ü°úÇÐȸÁö 2001³â 30±Ç 12È£ p.1388 ~ 1393
Ȳ¼ºÈ£, ¼Û±Ù¼º,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Ȳ¼ºÈ£ (  ) 
ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ½Å°æ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

¼Û±Ù¼º (  ) 
ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ½Å°æ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

ÀÏÃø¼º ¼öµÎÁõÀº ¿©·¯°¡Áö ¿øÀο¡ ÀÇÇØ ¹ß»ýµÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸³ª ÁÖ·Î Á¾¾çÀ̳ª °¨¿°µî¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ÈÄõÀûÀÎ ¸ó·Î°ø Æó¼âÀÇ °æ¿ì°¡ ´ëºÎºÐÀÌ°í ¼±Ãµ¼º ¸ó·Î°ø Æó¼â¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ÀÏÃø¼º ¼öµÎÁõÀº ±× ¿¹°¡ ¸¹Áö ¾Ê´Ù. »êÀüÃÊÀ½ÆÄ °Ë»ç·Î žÆÀÇ ¼±Ãµ¼º ÀÏÃø¼º ¼öµÎÁõÀ» Áø´ÜÇß°í Ãâ»ê ÈÄ ¼ö¼úÀû ¹æ¹ýÀ» ÅëÇØ Ä¡·áÇÑ ¿¹´Â ±¹³»¿¡ ¾ÆÁ÷ º¸°íµÈ ¹Ù°¡ ¾ø¾î À̸¦ ¹®Çå °íÂû°ú ÇÔ²² º¸°íÇÑ´Ù.
Objective : In the retrospective analyzing 19 consecutive patients with subaxial cervical spine (C3-T1) injury treated by posterior cervical fixation and fusion, clinical manifestation, radiologic finding, operative technique, and postoperative results following 6 months were analyzed. Materials and Methods : Most common fracture level was C4-5, mean age 41, and male to female ratio 13 : 6. The most common cause of injury was motor vehicle accident (17 cases). In 19 cervical procedures, interspinous triple wiring was done in 14 cases, lateral mass plating in 5 cases, and additional anterior fusion in 2 cases.
Results : Twelve weeks after operation, all cases were reviewed by plain cervical radiogram. In 17 cases that treated by posterior fusion only, 14cases(81%) had kyphotic angle change less than 5¡Æ , 2 cases (12%) 5-20¡Æ , and 1 case (6%) more than 20¡Æ. Overall fusion rate was 88%, and there was no significant difference of bone fusion rate between autogenous bone graft and allogenous bone graft.
Conclusion : In the case of severe posterior column injury or displacement, posterior approach seems superior to anterior approach, but in the case of combined anterior column injury, anterior approach is considered necessary.
In this study, posterior fixation and fusion might be acceptable procedure for subaxial cervical fracture and dislocation, owing to its high fusion rate, low kyphotic angulation and low operation related complication rate.

Subaxial cervical spine injury;Posterior fixation and fusion;Interspinous triple wiring;Lateral mass plating

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KoreaMed
KAMS