Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Ç÷¾×Åõ¼®È¯ÀÚ¿¡¼­ »ýüÀü±â ÀÓÇÇ´ø½º¹ý(Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis)¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Lean body mass(LBM)¿Í ¿µ¾ç»óÅ ÁöÇ¥µé°úÀÇ ¿¬°ü¼º Relationship between Lean Body Mass(LBM) by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis(BIA) and Nutritional Parameters in Hemodialysis Patients

´ëÇѽÅÀåÇÐȸÁö 1997³â 16±Ç 3È£ p.516 ~ 523
È«¼ººó, ±è¹®Àç, À̽¿ì, ¼ÛÁØÈ£,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
È«¼ººó ( Hong Seong-Bin ) 
ÀÎÇÏ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç

±è¹®Àç ( Kim Moon-Jae ) 
ÀÎÇÏ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç
À̽¿ì ( Lee Seoung-Woo ) 
ÀÎÇÏ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç
¼ÛÁØÈ£ ( Song Joon-Ho ) 
ÀÎÇÏ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

´Ü¹éÁú-¿­·® ¿µ¾ç½ÇÁ¶´Â Åõ¼®ÁßÀÎ ¸»±â ½ÅºÎÀüȯÀÚÀÇ 20-40%¿¡¼­ ¹ß°ßµÇ¸ç, À̵éÀÇ ÀÌȯÀ² ¹× »ç¸ÁÀ²ÀÇ Áß¿äÇÑ ÀÎÀÚ·Î º¸°íµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÎü°èÃø°ú ½ÄÀÌÆò°¡¹æ¹ý µîÀÌ Ç÷¾×Åõ¼® ȯÀÚµéÀÇ ¿µ¾ç»óŸ¦ Æò°¡Çϱâ À§ÇØ »ç¿ëµÇ°í ÀÖÁö¸¸ ü³» ¼öºÐÁ¤µµ¿Í ÃøÁ¤ÀÚÀÇ ±â¼ú µî¿¡ µû¶ó ÃøÁ¤Ä¡°¡ ´Þ¶óÁú ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¹®Á¦Á¡À» °¡Áö°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, »ýÈ­ÇÐÀû ÁöÇ¥µéÀº Á¶±â¿¡ ¿µ¾ç½ÇÁ¶¸¦ ¹ß°ßÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø´Â ´ÜÁ¡ÀÌ ÀÖ¾î, ÀÌ Á¡À» ±Øº¹Çϱâ À§ÇØ Ã¼±¸¼ººÐ¼®(body composition analysis)°ú °°Àº ´õ Á¤¹ÐÇÑ ¿µ¾ç»óÅ Æò°¡¹ýÀÌ ¿ä±¸µÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ü±¸¼ººÐ¼®¿¡µµ ¿©·¯ °¡Áö ¹æ¹ýÀÌ ÀÖÀ¸³ª ÃÖ±Ù »ýüÀü±â ÀÓÇÇ´ø½º¹ý(bioelectrical impedance analysis : ÀÌÇÏ BIA)°¡ ÃøÁ¤ÀÌ ¿ëÀÌÇÏ°í ½Å·Ú¼ºÀÌ ÁÁ¾Æ ÁÖ¸ñÀ» ¹Þ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ ÀúÀÚµéÀº Ç÷¾×Åõ¼®À» ½ÃÇàÇÑÁö 3°³¿ù ÀÌ»ó °æ°úµÇ°í ÀÓ»óÀûÀ¸·Î ¾ÈÁ¤µÈ ȯÀÚ 25¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î BIA¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Lean Body Mass(ÀÌÇÏ LBM)À» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ°í µ¿½Ã¿¡ »ýÈ­ÇÐÀû ÁöÇ¥, ½ÄÀ̼·Ãë·® Á¶»ç, Åõ¼®ÀÇ ÀûÀýµµ¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿© BIA·Î ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ LBM°ú ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù.

1) ´ë»óȯÀÚÀÇ Æò±Õ ¿¬·ÉÀº 43¡¾12¼¼, ³²³àºñ´Â 1:1.3, Æò±Õ Ç÷¾×Åõ¼® ±â°£Àº 56.3¡¾38.9°³¿ù, delivered Kt/Vurea´Â 1.5¡¾0.2/session, Ç÷û ¾ËºÎ¹ÎÀº 4.1¡¾0.4g/dl, ±×¸®°í %LBMÀº 76.5¡¾10.4%ÀÌ¿´´Ù.
2) BIA·Î ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ %LBMÀÌ 75%¸¦ ±âÁØÀ¸·Î 1±º(75% ¹Ì¸¸)°ú 2±º(75% ÀÌ»ó)À¸·Î ³ª´­ ¶§, 1±ºÀÇ È¯ÀÚµéÀº 2±º ȯÀڵ鿡 ºñÇØ ¿¬·ÉÀÌ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ³ô¾ÒÀ¸³ª(49.0¡¾13.2¼¼ vs. 39.7¡¾9.1 ¼¼), ±× ¿Ü ³²³àºñ, ´ç´¢º´ ȯÀÚ ¼ö, Åõ¼®±â°£Àº ¾ç ±º »çÀÌ¿¡ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. Ç÷û ÄÝ·¹½ºÅ×·Ñ(175.3¡¾35.2 vs. 142.5¡¾24.7mg/dL)Àº 1±ºÀÌ 2±º¿¡ ºñÇØ ÀÇÀÇÀÖ°Ô ³ô¾ÒÀ¸³ª, Å©·¹¾ÆƼ´Ñ(12.4¡¾2.7 vs. 16.2¡¾4.3mg/dL)Àº 2±º¿¡¼­ ÀÇÀÇÀÖ°Ô ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, Ç÷û ¾ËºÎ¹Î°ú insulin-like growth factor-I(IGF-I)Àº ¾ç ±º »çÀÌ¿¡ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. BIAÀÇ ÃøÁ¤°á°ú %LBM(67.9¡¾6.1 vs. 84.4¡¾1.9%), ÃÑü¾×·®(27.0¡¾2.9 vs. 34.1¡¾5.0%), ±âÃÊ´ë»çÀ²(1132.2¡¾ 147.1 vs. 1437.4¡¾215.4 Cal/day), ½ÅÀå2/ÀúÇ×(H2/R)(39.4¡¾4.3 vs. 52.7¡¾8.5)Àº 1±º¿¡¼­ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ³·¾Ò°í, % body fat(31.3¡¾4.6 vs. 15.7¡¾6.7%)Àº 1±º¿¡¼­ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ³ô¾Ò´Ù. ½ÄÀÌ ¼·Ãë·® Á¶»ç °á°ú ´Ü¹éÁú ¼·Ãë·®(30¡¾13.5 vs. 41.7¡¾14.6g/day)°ú ÃÑ ¿­·® ¼·Ãë·®(1239.9¡¾272.3 vs. 1329.4¡¾375.0 Cal/day)Àº 2±º¿¡¼­ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ³ô¾Ò´Ù.
3) BIA·Î ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ LBM°ú ¿©·¯ ¿µ¾çÁöÇ¥µé°£ÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ °üÂûÇÑ °á°ú, %LBMÀº Ç÷û Å©·¹¾ÆƼ´Ñ(r=0.41, p<0.05) ¹× 1ÀÏ ´Ü¹éÁú ¼·Ãë·®(r=0.51, p<0.05)°ú´Â À¯ÀÇÇÑ ¾çÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ º¸¿´°í, ¿¬·É(r=-0.59, p<0.05) ¹× Ç÷û ÄÝ·¹½ºÅ×·Ñ(r=-0.52, p<0.05)°ú´Â À½ÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ º¸¿´À¸³ª, Kt/Vurea, normalized protein catabolic rate(NPCR)°ú´Â À¯ÀÇÇÑ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»Áö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù.
ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°ú·Î Ç÷¾×Åõ¼®È¯ÀÚ¿¡¼­ BIA¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ÃøÁ¤µÈ %LBMÀº ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ¿µ¾ç»óÅÂÆò°¡¹ý°ú »ó°ü°ü°è°¡ ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.

The incidence of protein and energy malnutrition is about 20-40% in patients on maintenance dialysis and it is an important determinant of morbidily and mortality in end-stage renal disease. The traditional methods of nutritional assessment such as body measurement and dietary assessment are relatively ineffective becaase of operator dependency. Biochemical data, also, have the difficulty in early detection of malnutrition. Therefore more precise and simple method such as bioelectrical impedance analysis(BIA) was needed. We perfomed a study of 25 maintenance hemodia- lysis patients who were clinically stable and had been on dialysis over 3 months to identify the relationship between lean body mass(LBM) by BIA and other nutritional indicators. Mean age was 43¡¾12 years, sex ratio, M:F=l:1.3, and mean dialysis duration, 56¡¾38.9 month. Three patients were diabetes mellitus(12%), Delivered Kt/ Vurea, serum albumin, and %LBM were 1.5¡¾0.2/ session, 4.1¡¾0.4g/dl and 76.5 ¡¾10.5%, respectively. Patients were divided into 2 groups¡¯, group I whose %LBM was less than 75%, and group II whose %LBM was more than 75%. Patients were signi- ficantly older in group I, but sex ratio, percentage of diabetes mellitus, dialysis duration were not signi- ficantly different between two groups. Serum chole- sterol(175.3¡¾35.2 vs. 142.3¡¾24.7mg/Dl) was signifi- cantly higher and serum creatinine(12.4¡¾2.7 vs. 16.2 ¡¾4.3mg/Dl) was significantly lower in g@mup I. Serum albumin and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) were similar between two groups. On data measured by BIA, LBM(67.9¡¾6.1 vs. 84.4¡¾1.9%), height/resistance(39.4¡¾4.3 vs. 52.7¡¾8.5) were signi- ficantly lower in group I. %Body fat was signifi- cantly higher in group I(31.3¡¾4.6 vs. 15.7¡¾6.7%). Dietary protein intake(30¡¾13.5 vs. 41.7 ¡¾ 14.6g/day) and total calorie intake(1239.9¡¾272.3 vs. 1329.4¡¾ 375.0 Cal/day) were higher in group IL %LBM correlates positively with serum creatinine (r=0.41, p<0.05) and dietary protein intake(r=0.51, p<0.05), but negatively with age(r= - 0.59, p<0.05) and cholesterol(r= - 0.52, p<0.05). In conclusion, %LBM by BIA in maintenance hemodialysis patients appears to be well correlated with traditional nutritional study.

Å°¿öµå

BIA; Hemodialysis; Nutrition;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS