Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Á߽ɰ¢¸·µÎ²²°¡ ³ì³»Àå Áø´Ü¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ Influence of Central Corneal Thickness on Diagnosis of Glaucoma

´ëÇѾȰúÇÐȸÁö 2003³â 44±Ç 12È£ p.2823 ~ 2828
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÃÖ¿µÁÖ/Choi, Young Joo ±èÁ¤ÇÑ/¼Õ¿ëÈ£/Kim, Jung Han/Sohn, Yong Ho

Abstract

¸ñÀû : °í¾È¾ÐÁõ, ¿ø¹ß°³¹æ°¢³ì³»Àå, Á¤»ó¾È¾Ð³ì³»ÀåÀ¸·Î Áø´ÜµÈ ȯÀÚµéÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î Á߽ɰ¢¸·µÎ²²¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿© ¾È¾ÐÀ» º¸Á¤ÇÑ ÈÄ Áø´Ü¸íÀ» ÀçºÐ·ùÇÏ¿© Á߽ɰ¢¸·µÎ²²°¡ ³ì³»Àå Áø´Ü¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ¾Ë¾Æº¸°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
´ë»ó°ú ¹æ¹ý : 2002³â 6¿ùºÎÅÍ 2003³â 3¿ù±îÁö ±è¾È°ú º´¿ø¿¡¼­ ½Ã½Å°æ À¯µÎ °Ë»ç, ¾È¾Ð ÃøÁ¤(°ñµå¸¸¾ÐÆò¾È¾Ð°è), ½Ã¾ß °Ë»ç(Humphrey central 24-2)¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿© Áø´ÜµÈ °í¾È¾ÐÁõ 23¸í 23¾È, ¿ø¹ß°³¹æ°¢³ì³»Àå 20¸í 20¾È, Á¤»ó¾È¾Ð³ì³»Àå 31¸í 31¾È, Á¤»ó´ëÁ¶±º 27¸í 27¾ÈÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î Á߽ɰ¢¸·µÎ²²¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿© ¾È¾ÐÀ» º¸Á¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
°á°ú : Á߽ɰ¢¸·µÎ²²´Â Á¤»ó´ëÁ¶±º°ú ¿ø¹ß°³¹æ°¢³ì³»Àå ȯÀÚ±º»çÀÌ¿¡´Â À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾úÀ¸¸ç, Á¤»ó¾È¾Ð³ì³»Àå ȯÀÚ±º¿¡¼­´Â ´ëÁ¶±º¿¡ ºñÇؼ­ À¯ÀÇÇÐ ¾ã¾Ò°í(p=0.12), °í¾È¾ÐÁõ ȯÀÚ±º¿¡¼­´Â À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô µÎ²¨¿ü´Ù(p=0.002), °¢¸·µÎ²²·Î º¸Á¤ÇÑ ¾È¾ÐÀ» ±âÁØÀ¸·Î Áø´Ü¸íÀ» ÀçºÐ·ùÇÑ °á°ú, Á¤»ó¾È¾Ð³ì³»ÀåÀ¸·Î ºÐ·ùµÈ 31¾È Áß 7¾È(22.58%)ÀÌ ¿ø¹ß°³¹æ°¢³ì³»ÀåÀ¸·Î ºÐ·ùµÇ¾ú°í, °í¾È¾ÐÁõÀ¸·Î ºÐ·ùµÈ 23 ¾ÈÁß 13¾È (56.52%)ÀÌ Á¤»óÀ¸·Î ºÐ·ùµÇ¾ú´Ù.
°á·Ð : ¿ø¹ß°³¹æ°¢³ì³»Àå ȯÀÚ Áß¿¡¼­ Á߽ɰ¢¸·ÀÌ ¾ãÀº °æ¿ì¿¡´Â Á¤»ó¾È¾Ð³ì³»ÀåÀ¸·Î Áø´Ü µÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, Á߽ɰ¢¸·ÀÌ µÎ²¨¿î Á¤»óÀÎÀÇ °æ¿ì °í¾È¾ÐÁõÀ¸·Î Áø´ÜµÉ °¡´É¼ºÀÌ ÀÖÀ¸¹Ç·Î, ³ì³»Àå Áø´Ü ½Ã Á߽ɰ¢¸·µÎ²²¸¦ °í·ÁÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ¹Ù¶÷Á÷ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÈ´Ù.
<ÇѾÈÁö 44(12):2823-2828, 2003>
Purpose: To determine the effect of central corneal thickness (CCT) on the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) and diagnosis of glaucoma on the resultant reclassification of patients as having primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), normal tension glaucoma (NTG), or ocular hypertension (OHT).
Methods: Intraocular pressure (Goldmann applanation tonometry) and visual field test (Humphrey 24-2) were measured in 22 eyes of 23 patients with OHT, 20 eyes of 20 patients with POAG, 31 eyes of 31 patients with NTG, 27 eyes of 27 control subjects.
CCT was measured and used to obtain a corrected value for the IOP and to reclassify the type of glaucoma.
Results: There was no significant difference in CCT between controls and patients with POAG, but the CCT in the group with NTG was significantly lower than that in the control group (p=0.012),and the CCT in the group with OHT was significantly higher than in controls (p=0.002). Correcting IOP for corneal thickness, 22.58% of patients with NTG could be reclassified as having POAG, and 56.52% of the patients with OHT as normal.
Conclusions: Underestimation of the TOP in patients with POAG who have thin cornea may lead to a misdiagnosis of NTG, while overestimation of the TOP in normal subjects who have thick cornea may lead to a misdiagnosis of OHT. We suggest that CCT must be considered in diagnosis of glaucoma.
J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 44(12):2823-2828, 2.003

Å°¿öµå

Central corneal thickness;Glaucoma;Intraocular pressue

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS