Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¶ó½Ä¼ö¼ú½Ã ¹Ì¼¼°¢¸·Àý»è±â Ä®³¯ÀÇ Àç»ç¿ë Reuse of the Microkeratome Blade to Make a Consistent Corneal Flap in LASIK

´ëÇѾȰúÇÐȸÁö 2003³â 44±Ç 12È£ p.2864 ~ 2868
ÃÖ¿µÀÎ, Á¤ÁøÈ£,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÃÖ¿µÀΠ(  ) 
À»ÁöÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾È°úÇб³½Ç

Á¤ÁøÈ£ (  ) 
À»ÁöÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾È°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

¸ñÀû : LASIK ¼ö¼ú¿¡¼­ óÀ½ »ç¿ë½Ã ¸¸µé¾îÁø °¢¸·ÀýÆí µÎ²²¸¦ ¾Ë°í ÀÖ´Â ¹Ì¼¼°¢¸·Àý»è±â Ä®³¯À» Àç»ç¿ë ÇÒ °æ¿ì Á»´õ ÀÏÁ¤ÇÑ µÎ²²ÀÇ °¢¸·ÀýÆíÀ» ¸¸µé ¼ö ÀÖ´ÂÁö ¾Ë¾Æº¸¾Ò´Ù.
´ë»ó°ú ¹æ¹ý : óÀ½ »ç¿ë½Ã 120~160 §­µÎ²²ÀÇ °¢¸·ÀýÆíÀÌ ¸¸µé¾îÁ³´ø Ä®³¯À» Àç»ç¿ëÇÏ¿© 26¸í, 40¾È¿¡¼­ LASIK ¼ö¼úÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. Àç»ç¿ëÇÑ Ä®³¯À» »ç¿ëÇß´ø ȯÀÚµéÀÇ ¼ö¼ú Àü Á߽ɰ¢¸·µÎ²², ±¸¸é·»Áî´ëÀÀÄ¡, °¢¸·°î·ü°ª°ú ³­½Ã°¡ ºñ½ÁÇÑ ¹üÀ§¿¡ Àִ ȯÀÚ 25¸í, 40¾ÈÀ» »õ Ä®³¯À» »ç¿ëÇß´ø ȯÀÚµé Áß¿¡¼­ ¼±ÅÃÇÏ¿© ´ëÁ¶±ºÀ¸·Î ÇÏ°í, µÎ ±ºÀÇ °¢¸·ÀýÆí µÎ²²ÀÇ Æò±Õ°ú ÆíÂ÷¸¦ ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
°á°ú : °¢¸·ÀýÆí µÎ²²ÀÇ Æò±ÕÀº Àç»ç¿ë±º 134.3¡¾18.0 §­(¹üÀ§ 89.6~161.7 §­), ´ëÁ¶±º 134.4¡¾24.6 §­(¹üÀ§ 62.3~177.0 §­)À̾ú´Ù. µÎ²²ÀÇ ¹üÀ§´Â Àç»ç¿ë±º¿¡¼­ Á¼¾ÒÁö¸¸, µÎ²²ÀÇ ÆíÂ÷´Â Àç»ç¿ë±º 14.7¡¾10.0 §­, ´ëÁ¶±º 18.4¡¾16.0 §­·Î µÎ ±ºÀÇ ÆíÂ÷´Â Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î ÀǹÌÀÖ´Â Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù(p=0.218)
°á·Ð : ¹Ì¼¼°¢¸·Àý»è±â Ä®³¯À» Àç»ç¿ëÇÏ¿©µµ °¢¸·ÀýÆí µÎ²²ÀÇ ÆíÂ÷¸¦ ÀǹÌÀÖ°Ô ÁÙÀÏ ¼ö ¾ø¾ú´Ù.
<ÇѾÈÁö 44(12):2864-2868, 2003>
Purpose: We evaluated the possibility of making a consistent corneal flap by reusing the microkeratome blade.
Methods: We performed LASIK surgery on 40 eyes of 26 patients by reusing the microkeratome blades which made the corneal flap thickness between 120 §­ and 160 §­ in the previous LASIK surgery. We selected 40 eyes of 25 patients with the same range of preoperative central corneal thickness, spherical equivalent, keratometry values, and astigmatism as a control group from the patients who had LASIK surgery with new microkeratome blades. We compared the mean and the deviation of the corneal flap thickness between the two groups.
Results The mean central thickness of the corneal flap was 134.3¡¾18.0 §­ (range 89.6?161.7 §­) in the group using reused blades, and 134.4¡¾24.6 §­ (range 62.3~177.0 §­) in the control group. The mean deviation of the comeal flap thickness. was 14.7¡¾10.0 §­ in the group using reused blades and 18.4¡¾16.0 §­ in the control group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (p =0.218).
Conclusions: The amount of deviation of corneal flap thickness was not decreased by reusing the microkeratome blade.
J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 44(12):2864-2868, 2003

Å°¿öµå

Consistent cormeal flap;LASIK;Reused microkeratome blade

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS