Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¹é³»Àå¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ¹ß»ýÇÑ ºñÀüÇüÀû ÀÓ»ó¾ç»óÀÇ ½ºÆ®·¾ÅäÄÚÄ¿½º µð½º°¥¶ôƼ¾Æ ¾È³»¿° 2¿¹ Two Cases of Unusual Presentation of Postoperative Endophthalmitis Caused by Streptococcus dysgalactiae Subspecies Equisimilis

´ëÇѾȰúÇÐȸÁö 2019³â 60±Ç 3È£ p.280 ~ 286
À¯¿õ¼±, °­ÇöÁö, Á¤Áö¼º, ½Å¹ÎÈ£, Á¤Àοµ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À¯¿õ¼± ( You Woong-Sun ) 
°æ»ó´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾È°úÇб³½Ç

°­ÇöÁö ( Kang Hyun-Ji ) 
°æ»ó´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾È°úÇб³½Ç
Á¤Áö¼º ( Jeong Ji-Seong ) 
°æ»ó´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾È°úÇб³½Ç
½Å¹ÎÈ£ ( Shin Min-Ho ) 
°æ»ó´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾È°úÇб³½Ç
Á¤Àοµ ( Chung In-Young ) 
°æ»ó´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾È°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

¸ñÀû: ¹é³»Àå¼ö¼ú ÈÄ Streptococcus dysgalactiae subspecies equisimilis (SDSE)¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¾È³»¿°À¸·Î Ãʱ޼º ¹ßÇö°ú Àü¾È±¸¿°ÀÇ ºñÀüÇüÀû Áõ»óÀ» º¸ÀÎ 2¿¹¸¦ º¸°íÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù.

Áõ·Ê¿ä¾à: 68¼¼ ȯÀÚ°¡ ¹é³»Àå¼ö¼ú ÈÄ 24½Ã°£ À̳»¿¡ ¹ß»ýÇÑ ½Ã·ÂÀúÇÏ·Î ³»¿øÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ½Ã·ÂÀº ±¤°¢ »óÅ¿´À¸¸ç ¾È±¸ ³» ½ÉÇÑ ¿°Áõ ¼Ò°ßÀ¸·Î À¯¸®Ã¼ÀýÁ¦¼ú°ú À¯¸®Ã¼³» Ç×»ýÁ¦ Áֻ縦 ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. SDSE°¡ µ¿Á¤µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ¿°ÁõÀº È£ÀüµÇ¾úÀ¸³ª °¢¸·ºÎÁ¾Àº Áö¼ÓµÇ¾ú°í ¼ú ÈÄ 3°³¿ù° ¼öÆ÷°¢¸·º´Áõ°ú ¾È±¸À§ÃàÀ¸·Î ÁøÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. 87¼¼ ȯÀÚ°¡ 2ÀÏ Àü ¹é³»Àå¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ½Ã·ÂÀúÇÏ¿Í ¾È±¸ÅëÁõÀ¸·Î ³»¿øÇÏ¿´´Ù. ³»¿ø ½Ã ½Ã·ÂÀº ±¤°¢¹« »óÅ·Π¾È±¸ ³» ½ÉÇÑ ¿°Áõ ¼Ò°ß°ú °¢¸·±Ë»ç·Î À¯¸®Ã¼³» Ç×»ýÁ¦ Áֻ縸 ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. SDSE°¡ µ¿Á¤µÇ¾ú°í ¼ú ÈÄ 4ÀÏ° Àü¾È±¸¿° ¼Ò°ßÀÌ °üÂûµÇ¾î Ç×»ýÁ¦ Á¤¸ÆÁÖ»ç ÈÄ È£ÀüµÇ¾úÀ¸³ª ¼ú ÈÄ 3°³¿ù° ¾È±¸À§ÃàÀ¸·Î ÁøÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á·Ð: ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ¹ß»ýÇÑ SDSE ¾È³»¿°Àº Ãʱ޼ºÀÇ ¾ç»óÀ» º¸À̸ç Áï°¢ÀûÀÎ Ä¡·á¿¡µµ È£ÀüµÇÁö ¾Ê¾Æ ½Ç¸íÀ¸·Î ÁøÇàµÇ±âµµ ÇÑ´Ù. SDSE´Â ÃÖ±Ù ¹ß°ßÀÌ Áõ°¡µÇ´Â Ãß¼¼·Î ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ¹ß»ýÇÑ ¾È³»¿°¿¡¼­ ¿øÀαÕÀ¸·Î ¹Ýµå½Ã °í·ÁÇØ¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.

Purpose: To report two cases of postoperative endophthalmitis caused by Streptococcus dysgalactiae subspecies equisimilis (SDSE), which appeared as hyperacute presentation and panophthalmitis.

Case summary: A 68-year-old male was treated with cataract surgery and was evaluated the next day (less than 24 hours after surgery) because of acute loss of vision. There was severe inflammation and the visual acuity was light perception. The patient underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with intravitreal antibiotic injection. The vitreous culture revealed SDSE. After PPV, regression of inflammation was observed, although the corneal edema had progressed. The cornea evolved to decompensate due to bullous keratopathy and visual acuity of the eye decreased to no light perception after 3 months. A 87-year-old male who underwent phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation 2 days previously was hospitalized due to severe ocular pain and visual loss. There was severe inflammation, and the visual acuity was no light perception. The patient received only intravitreal injections of antibiotics due to severe corneal necrosis. The aqueous humor revealed SDSE. Four days after intravitreal injection, erythema and swelling of the eyelid of the affected eye was observed, and diagnosed as panophthalmitis. After treatment with intravenous antibiotics, cellulitis of the eyelid was resolved. The eye progressed as phthisis after 3 months without recurrence.

Conclusions: Postoperative SDSE endophthalmitis showed aggressive and hyperacute presentation, resulting in blindness despite prompt treatment. SDSE is an emerging organism and should be considered a potential cause of postoperative endophthalmitis.

Å°¿öµå

Endophthalmitis; Eye infections; Panophthalmitis; Streptococcus; Streptococcus dysgalactiae subspecies equisimilis

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS