Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

°íµµ±Ù½ÃȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ Ç¥ÃþȲ¹Ý¿ø°ø¿¡ ´ëÇÑ À¯¸®Ã¼ÀýÁ¦¼úÀÇ È¿°ú Effects of Vitrectomy on the Treatment of a Lamellar Macular Hole in Highly Myopic Patients

´ëÇѾȰúÇÐȸÁö 2019³â 60±Ç 4È£ p.315 ~ 322
±èÈñ¿ø, ÃßÇ屸, ¼º»ê, ¿ÀÇö¼·, À¯¿ë¼º, ±è¼øÇö, ±Ç¿À¿õ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÈñ¿ø ( Kim Hee-Weon ) 
´©³×¾È°úº´¿ø

ÃßÇ屸 ( Choo Hun-Ku ) 
´©³×¾È°úº´¿ø
¼º»ê ( Seong San ) 
´©³×¾È°úº´¿ø
¿ÀÇö¼· ( Oh Hyun-Sub ) 
´©³×¾È°úº´¿ø
À¯¿ë¼º ( You Yong-Sung ) 
´©³×¾È°úº´¿ø
±è¼øÇö ( Kim Soon-Hyun ) 
´©³×¾È°úº´¿ø
±Ç¿À¿õ ( Kwon Oh-Woong ) 
´©³×¾È°úº´¿ø

Abstract

¸ñÀû: °íµµ±Ù½ÃȯÀÚÀÇ Ç¥ÃþȲ¹Ý¿ø°ø¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¼úÀû Ä¡·áÀÇ È¿°ú¿¡ ´ëÇØ ¾Ë¾Æº¸°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

´ë»ó°ú ¹æ¹ý: °íµµ±Ù½ÃȯÀÚ Áß Ç¥ÃþȲ¹Ý¿ø°øÀ¸·Î 23°ÔÀÌÁö À¯¸®Ã¼ÀýÁ¦¼úÀ» ½ÃÇà¹ÞÀº 31¸í 31¾ÈÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÈÄÇâÀûÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. °íµµ±Ù½Ã¿¡ ÇØ´çµÇÁö ¾ÊÀº ȯÀÚ Áß Ç¥ÃþȲ¹Ý¿ø°øÀ¸·Î ¼ö¼ú¹ÞÀº 32¸í 32¾ÈÀ» ´ëÁ¶±ºÀ¸·Î ¼³Á¤ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÃÖ´ë±³Á¤½Ã·Â, ºû°£¼·´ÜÃþÃÔ¿µÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Ç¥ÃþȲ¹Ý¿ø°øÀÇ ±¸Á¶Àû º¯È­¸¦ ¼ö¼ú Àü, ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ 6°³¿ù, 12°³¿ù, 24°³¿ù°¸¶´Ù ºñ±³ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú: °íµµ±Ù½Ã±º°ú ´ëÁ¶±ºÀº ¼ú Àü ÃÖ´ë±³Á¤½Ã·Â°ú Á߽ɱ¸¿ªÈ²¹ÝµÎ²²¿¡¼­ Åë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. 1Â÷ ¼ö¼ú ¼º°ø·üÀº °íµµ±Ù½Ã±º¿¡¼­ 96.77%, ´ëÁ¶±º¿¡¼­ 100%ÀÇ ¼º°ø·üÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. ¼ú ÈÄ 24°³¿ù° °íµµ±Ù½Ã±ºÀº ´ëÁ¶±º¿¡ ºñÇØ Åë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ºÒ·®ÇÑ ÃÖ´ë±³Á¤½Ã·ÂÀ» º¸¿©ÁÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç, Á߽ɱ¸¿ªÈ²¹ÝµÎ²², Ç¥ÃþȲ¹Ý¿ø°øÀÇ ³»Ãø Á÷°æ°ú ¿ÜÃø Á÷°æ¿¡¼­ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. °íµµ±Ù½Ã±º¿¡¼­ Á߽ɿÍÃþ°£ºÐ¸®°¡ µ¿¹ÝµÇ¾î Àְųª -8.0µð¿ÉÅÍ ÀÌ»óÀÎ ÃÊ°íµµ±Ù½Ã¾È¿¡¼­´Â ¼ú ÈÄ ÃÖ´ë±³Á¤½Ã·ÂÀÇ À¯ÀÇÇÑ È£ÀüÀ» º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù.

°á·Ð: °íµµ±Ù½Ã¾È¿¡¼­ µ¿¹ÝµÈ Ç¥ÃþȲ¹Ý¿ø°ø¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¼úÀû Ä¡·á´Â ¿ì¼öÇÑ ¼ö¼ú¼º°ø·üÀ» º¸À̳ª, ºñ°íµµ±Ù½Ã¾È¿¡ ºñÇؼ­ Åë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î ºÒ·®ÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. °íµµ±Ù½Ã¿¡¼­ Ç¥ÃþȲ¹Ý¿ø°øÀº ¼ú Àü ½Ã·Â°ú Ȳ¹Ý ±¸Á¶°¡ º¸Á¸µÇ¾î ÀÖÀ» ¶§ Á¶±â ¼ö¼úÀû Ä¡·á¸¦ °í·ÁÇØ º¼ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of surgical treatment for a lamellar macular hole in highly myopic patients.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 31 eyes of 31 patients with a high myopia, who underwent 23-gauge vitrectomy and inner limiting membrane peeling after diagnosis of a lamellar macular hole. Thirty-two eyes of 32 patients with no high myopia were selected as the control group. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was checked and optical coherence tomography was used to evaluate structural changes in the lamellar macular hole before surgery, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery.

Results: The high myopia group and the control group showed statistically significant differences between preoperative BCVA and central foveal thickness. The success of primary surgery was 96.77% in the high myopia group and 100% in the control group. At postoperative 24 months, the high myopia group showed significantly poorer BCVA, and a statistically significant difference in the central foveal thickness and the inner and outer diameters of the lamellar macular hole. In cases of foveoschisis or a very high degree of myopia of more than -8.0 diopters, there was no significant improvement in BCVA after surgery.

Conclusions: Surgical treatment of a lamellar macular hole associated with a high degree of myopia showed excellent surgical success, but was as statistically significant as surgical treatment of non-myopia eyes. Early surgical treatment can be considered for a lamellar macular hole associated with a high degree of myopia when preoperative visual acuity and macular architecture are preserved.

Å°¿öµå

Central foveal thickness; High myopia; Internal limiting membrane peeling; Lamellar macular hole

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS