Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¾È³»À̹°ÀÇ ÀÔ±¸ À§Ä¡¿¡ µû¸¥ ÀÓ»ó¾ç»ó Clinical Characteristics of Intraocular Foreign Bodies According to Entrance Location: Corneal vs. Non-Corneal

´ëÇѾȰúÇÐȸÁö 2019³â 60±Ç 4È£ p.348 ~ 354
¹Ú¼±È£, ÀÌÀçÁ¤, ±ÇÇÑÁ¶, ÀÌÁöÀº, ¹Ú¼ºÈÄ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹Ú¼±È£ ( Park Sun-Ho ) 
ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾È°úÇб³½Ç

ÀÌÀçÁ¤ ( Lee Jae-Jung ) 
ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾È°úÇб³½Ç
±ÇÇÑÁ¶ ( Kwon Han-Jo ) 
ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾È°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌÁöÀº ( Lee Ji-Eun ) 
ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾È°úÇб³½Ç
¹Ú¼ºÈÄ ( Park Sung-Who ) 
ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾È°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

¸ñÀû: ¾È³»À̹°¿¡¼­ °¢¸·°ú °¢¸· ÀÌ¿ÜÀÇ À̹° ÀÔ±¸ À§Ä¡¿¡ µû¸¥ ÀÓ»ó¾ç»óÀÇ Â÷À̸¦ ¾Ë¾Æº¸°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

´ë»ó°ú ¹æ¹ý: 2011³â 1¿ùºÎÅÍ 2016³â 7¿ù±îÁö ¾È³»À̹°Á¦°Å¼úÀ» ½ÃÇà¹ÞÀº ȯÀÚµéÀÇ Àǹ«±â·ÏÀ» ÈÄÇâÀûÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Àǹ«±â·ÏÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© ÀÔ±¸°¡ °¢¸·ÀÎ °æ¿ì¿Í °¢¸·ÀÌ ¾Æ´Ñ °æ¿ì·Î ºÐ·ùÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼ö¼ú±â·ÏÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© ¼öÁ¤Ã¼Àü³¶ ¹× Èij¶, ¸Á¸·¿­°ø°ú ¹Ú¸® µî ¾È±¸³» ¼Õ»ó ºÎÀ§¸¦ Á¶»çÇÏ¿´°í, À̹° Á¦°Å ¹æ¹ý ¹× Àΰø¼öÁ¤Ã¼ »ðÀÔ µî ¼ö¼ú ¹æ¹ýÀÇ Â÷À̸¦ ¾Ë¾Æº¸¾Ò´Ù.

°á°ú: 43¸í 43¾ÈÀÌ Æ÷ÇԵǾú´Ù. ÀÔ±¸°¡ °¢¸·ÀÎ °æ¿ì°¡ 33¾È(76.7%), °¢¸·ÀÌ ¾Æ´Ñ °æ¿ì°¡ 10¾È(23.3%)À̾ú´Ù. ¾È³»À̹°ÀÇ ÀÔ±¸°¡ °¢¸·ÀÎ °æ¿ì Áß Èij¶ÀÌ º¸Á¸µÈ °æ¿ì´Â 24.2% (8¾È)À̾ú°í, ¾È³»À̹°ÀÇ ÀÔ±¸°¡ °¢¸·ÀÌ ¾Æ´Ñ °æ¿ì´Â 80% (8¾È)¿¡¼­ Èij¶ÀÌ º¸Á¸µÇ¾ú´Ù. ¾È³»À̹°ÀÇ ÀÔ±¸°¡ °¢¸·ÀÌ ¾Æ´Ñ °æ¿ì¿¡¼­ Èij¶ º¸Á¸ °¡´É¼ºÀÌ ³ô¾Ò´Ù. ¾È³»À̹°ÀÇ ÀÔ±¸°¡ °¢¸·ÀÎ °æ¿ì´Â ¸Á¸·¿­°øÀÌ ¾ø´Â °æ¿ì°¡ 60.6%¿´°í °¢¸·ÀÌ ¾Æ´Ñ °æ¿ì´Â 20%¿¡¼­ ¸Á¸·¿­°øÀÌ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. À̹°ÀÇ ÀÔ±¸°¡ °¢¸·ÀÌ ¾Æ´Ñ °æ¿ì¿¡¼­ ¸Á¸·¿­°øÀÇ °¡´É¼ºÀÌ ³ô¾Ò´Ù.

°á·Ð: ¾È³»À̹° ÀÔ±¸ÀÇ À§Ä¡´Â ¼öÁ¤Ã¼³¶°ú ¸Á¸·¼Õ»ó °¡´É¼ºÀ» ¿¹ÃøÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÀÎÀÚÀÌ´Ù.

Purpose: To investigate differences in the clinical features of post-traumatic intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs) according to their entrance locations, specifically, those penetrating the cornea and those not penetrating the cornea.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of patients with an IOFB from January 2011 to July 2016. The patients were divided into two groups: those in whom the IOFB entered through the cornea (¡°corneal entrance¡± group) and those in whom the IOFB did not penetrate the cornea (¡°non-corneal entrance¡± group), and compared. Damage to the anterior and posterior capsule, retinal tear, and retinal detachment were analyzed, and differences in surgical techniques including the IOFB extraction route and intraocular lens implantation were recorded.

Results: A total of 43 eyes (43 patients) were included, with 33 (76.7%) in the corneal entrance group and 10 (23.3%) in the non-corneal group. The posterior capsule was preserved in 24.2% (eight) of eyes in the corneal group and 80% (eight) of eyes in the non-corneal group. The corneal group had significantly more posterior capsule ruptures but dramatically fewer retinal tears (39.4%) than the non-corneal group (80% retinal tears).

Conclusions: The location of IOFB entrance is a predictable factor of lens capsule and retinal injuries.

Å°¿öµå

Entrance; Intraocular foreign body; Posterior capsule rupture; Retinal tear

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS