Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¼±Ãµ´«²¨Ç®Ã³ÁüȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ´«²¨Ç®Ã³Áü±³Á¤¼úÀÇ ÀÓ»ó°á°ú ºñ±³ ¹× ±¼ÀýÀÌ»ó Ư¼º Clinical Outcomes and Refractive Error Characteristics in Patients with Congenital Blepharoptosis after Ptosis Repair Surgery

´ëÇѾȰúÇÐȸÁö 2019³â 60±Ç 12È£ p.1275 ~ 1283
¼Õ±â¿µ, ±èÀ±´ö, ¿ì°æÀÎ, ¹Ú°æ¾Æ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¼Õ±â¿µ ( Son Ki-Young ) 
¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »ï¼º¼­¿ïº´¿ø ¾È°úÇб³½Ç

±èÀ±´ö ( Kim Yoon-Duck ) 
¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »ï¼º¼­¿ïº´¿ø ¾È°úÇб³½Ç
¿ì°æÀΠ( Woo Kyung-In ) 
¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »ï¼º¼­¿ïº´¿ø ¾È°úÇб³½Ç
¹Ú°æ¾Æ ( Park Kyung-Ah ) 
¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »ï¼º¼­¿ïº´¿ø ¾È°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

¸ñÀû: ¼±Ãµ´«²¨Ç®Ã³ÁüȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ±³Á¤¼ú ¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¸¥ ÀÓ»ó°á°ú¿Í ±¼Àý º¯È­¿¡ ´ëÇؼ­ ¾Ë¾Æº¸°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

´ë»ó°ú ¹æ¹ý: 2008³â 1¿ùºÎÅÍ 2018³â 10¿ù±îÁö ¼±Ãµ´«²¨Ç®Ã³ÁüÀ» Áø´Ü¹Þ°í, º¸Á¸´ëÅð±Ù¸·À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ À̸¶±Ù°É±â¼ú ¶Ç´Â ÃÖ´ë´«²¨Ç®¿Ã¸²±ÙÀýÁ¦¼úÀ» ½ÃÇà ¹ÞÀº 8¼¼ ¹Ì¸¸ÀÇ È¯ÀÚ Áß ±¼ÀýÀÌ»óÀ» µ¿¹ÝÇÏ°í, ȯÀÚ 73¸í, 86¾ÈÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î Àǹ«±â·ÏÀ» ÈÄÇâÀûÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼ö¼ú Àü°ú ¼ö¼ú 1³â ÈÄ MRD1À» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´°í ¼ö¼ú ¹æ¹ý °£ ÀÓ»ó°á°ú¸¦ ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼ö¼ú Àü, ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ 1³â ÈÄ ³­½Ã¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´°í, ¼ö¼ú ÀüÈÄ ³­½Ã, ¼ö¼ú ¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¸¥ ³­½Ã º¯È­·®, ³­½Ã º¯È­¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ÁÖ´Â ¿äÀÎÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú: ¼±Ãµ´«²¨Ç®Ã³Áü 86¾È Áß 42¾È(48.8%)¿¡¼­ ÃÖ´ë´«²¨Ç®¿Ã¸²±ÙÀýÁ¦¼ú, 44¾È(51.2%)¿¡¼­ º¸Á¸´ëÅð±Ù¸·À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ À̸¶±Ù°É±â¼úÀÌ ½ÃÇàµÇ¾ú°í, °¢°¢ 95.2%, 75.0%¿¡¼­ ÀÓ»óÀûÀ¸·Î ¸¸Á·½º·¯¿î °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù(p=0.014). ´Ü¾È ´«²¨Ç®Ã³Áü¾È¿¡¼­ ¼ú Àü Æò±Õ ³­½Ã´Â ´«²¨Ç®Ã³Áü¾ÈÀÌ -0.71 ¡¾ 0.85D, Á¤»ó¾ÈÀÌ -0.66 ¡¾ 0.97D·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. ´«²¨Ç®Ã³Áü¾ÈÀÇ ³­½Ã´Â ¼ö¼ú Àü -0.71 ¡¾ 0.85D, ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ -1.27 ¡¾ 1.2D·Î ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ³­½Ã°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´°í(p<0.001), ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ MRD1 Å©±â°¡ ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ³­½Ã Áõ°¡¿Í ¿¬°üÀÌ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù(p=0.022, r=-0.261).

°á·Ð: ¼±Ãµ´«²¨Ç®Ã³ÁüȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ º¸Á¸´ëÅð±Ù¸·À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ À̸¶±Ù°É±â¼ú¿¡ ºñÇØ ÃÖ´ë´«²¨Ç®¿Ã¸²±ÙÀýÁ¦¼úÀÌ ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ´õ ³ôÀº ¼º°ø·ü °æÇâÀ» º¸¿©ÁÖ¾ú´Ù. ´«²¨Ç®Ã³Áü¾È°ú Á¤»ó¾ÈÀÇ ¼ö¼ú Àü ±¼Àý°ª Â÷ÀÌ´Â ¾ø¾úÀ¸³ª, ´«²¨Ç®Ã³ÁüÀÌ Àß ±³Á¤µÈ ȯ¾Æµé¿¡¼­ ±¼Àý°ª º¯È­°¡ ´õ ¸¹¾Æ ÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÇØ °æ°ú °üÂû°ú Ä¡·á°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÈ´Ù.

Purpose: We investigated changes in postoperative refractive error after surgery to treat congenital ptosis and the clinical outcomes by surgical method.

Methods: The study was retrospective and interventional. We enrolled 73 patients in whom 86 eyes exhibited visual axis-obscuring congenital ptosis. All patients were under 8 years of age, with refractive errors or amblyopia, and underwent maximal levator resection or frontalis sling surgery with fascia lata preservation from January 2008 to January 2018; the minimum follow-up time was 6 months. Visual and surgical outcomes were assessed by reviewing clinical photographs taken before and 1 year after surgery. Refractive error changes were measured at these times.

Results: Maximal levator resection was performed on 42 of 86 eyes (48.8%) and frontalis sling surgery with preservation of
the fascia lata on 44 eyes, 95.2% and 75.0% of patients, respectively, exhibited good or fair surgical outcomes. The preoperative mean astigmatisms of the ptotic and control eyes of those with unilateral disease did not differ significantly: -0.71 ¡¾ 0.85 D for ptotic eyes and -0.66 ¡¾ 0.97 D for control eyes. The mean astigmatism increased from -0.71 ¡¾ 0.85 D preoperatively to -1.27 ¡¾ 1.2 D postoperatively (p < 0.001). The postoperative MRD1 value correlated with the increase in postoperative astigmatism (p = 0.022, r = -0.261).

Conclusions: Maximal levator resection tended to afford better surgical outcomes than frontalis sling surgery with preservation of the fascia lata in patients with congenital ptosis. Patients in whom the postoperative eyelid position was good tended to exhibit higher refractive errors. Careful examination and treatment are recommended to ensure good visual outcomes.

Å°¿öµå

Astigmatism; Blepharoptosis; Congenital; Frontalis sling; Maximal levator resec

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS