Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÏÂ÷ ¿­°ø¸Á¸·¹Ú¸® ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ¸Æ¶ô¸·Ç÷°üÁö¼ö ºÐ¼® Choroidal Vascularity Index in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment

´ëÇѾȰúÇÐȸÁö 2020³â 61±Ç 12È£ p.1477 ~ 1484
Á¶Ã¢¿ì, °ûÇö´ö,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Á¶Ã¢¿ì ( Cho Chang-Woo ) 
Inje University College of Medicine Inje University Busan Paik Hospital Department of Ophthalmology

°ûÇö´ö ( Kwak Hyun-Duck ) 
Inje University College of Medicine Inje University Busan Paik Hospital Department of Ophthalmology

Abstract

¸ñÀû: ´Ü¾ÈÀÇ ÀÏÂ÷ ¿­°ø¸Á¸·¹Ú¸® ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ¸Á¸·¹Ú¸®¾ÈÀÇ ¸Æ¶ô¸·Ç÷°üÁö¼ö¸¦ ¹Ý´ë¾È°ú ºñ±³ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

´ë»ó°ú ¹æ¹ý: ´Ü¾ÈÀÇ ÀÏÂ÷ ¿­°ø¸Á¸·¹Ú¸®·Î 2017³â 1¿ùºÎÅÍ 2018³â 1¿ù±îÁö ¼ö¼ú ¹ÞÀº ȯÀÚ Áß ÃÊÁø ½Ã ¾ç¾ÈÀÇ ºû°£¼·´ÜÃþÃÔ¿µÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÑ È¯ÀÚ¸¦ ÈÄÇâÀûÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÃÊÁø ´ç½Ã ¸Á¸·¹Ú¸®¾È°ú ¹Ý´ë¾È, ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ 3°³¿ù° ¸Á¸·¹Ú¸®¾ÈÀÇ Áß½É¿Í ÇϺΠ¸Æ¶ô¸·Ç÷°üÁö¼ö¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç µÎ ¸íÀÇ µ¶¸³µÈ ¾È°ú Àǻ翡 ÀÇÇØ Image J ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú: ÃÑ 45¸íÀÇ È¯ÀÚ°¡ ´ë»ó¿¡ Æ÷ÇԵǾú´Ù. ¸Á¸·¹Ú¸®°¡ Ȳ¹ÝºÎ¸¦ ħ¹üÇÑ °æ¿ì´Â 25¸íÀ̾ú´Ù. Àüü ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ¸Á¸·¹Ú¸®¾ÈÀÇ ¸Æ¶ô¸·Ç÷°üÁö¼ö´Â 65.61 ¡¾ 3.37, ¹Ý´ë¾ÈÀÇ ¸Æ¶ô¸·Ç÷°üÁö¼ö´Â 67.28 ¡¾ 3.44·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù(p=0.024). ¸Á¸·¹Ú¸®¾ÈÀÇ ¼ú Àü, ¼ú ÈÄ 3°³¿ù° ¸Æ¶ô¸·Ç÷°üÁö¼ö¸¦ ºñ±³Çغ¸¾ÒÀ» ¶§ ÇÏÀ§±×·ìºÐ¼®¿¡¼­ Ȳ¹ÝºÎ¹Ú¸®°¡ ¾ø´Â °æ¿ì ¼ú Àü 67.62 ¡¾ 2.35, ¼ú ÈÄ 65.84 ¡¾ 3.04¿´°í(p=0.009), Ȳ¹ÝºÎ¹Ú¸®°¡ ÀÖ´Â °æ¿ì ¼ú Àü 64.01 ¡¾ 3.21, ¼ú ÈÄ 66.69 ¡¾ 2.64·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù(p<0.001).

°á·Ð: ÀÏÂ÷ ¿­°ø¸Á¸·¹Ú¸® ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ¸Á¸·¹Ú¸®¾ÈÀÇ ¸Æ¶ô¸·Ç÷°üÁö¼ö´Â ¹Ý´ë¾È¿¡ ºñÇØ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô °¨¼ÒÇß´Ù. ¼ú ÀüÈÄ ¸Æ¶ô¸·Ç÷°üÁö¼ö´Â Ȳ¹ÝºÎ ħ¹üÀÌ ¾ø´Â ¸Á¸·¹Ú¸®¾È¿¡¼­ ¼ú Àüº¸´Ù ¼ú ÈÄ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô °¨¼ÒÇϸç Ȳ¹ÝºÎ ħ¹üÀÌ ÀÖ´Â ¸Á¸·¹Ú¸®¾ÈÀÇ °æ¿ì ¼ú ÈÄ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô Áõ°¡ÇÔÀ» È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÃßÈÄ ¸Á¸·¹Ú¸®°¡ ¸Æ¶ô¸·ÀÇ Ç÷°ü ¹× ±âÁúÀÇ º¯È­¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Ãß°¡ÀûÀÎ ¿¬±¸°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.

Purpose: To analyze the choroidal vascularity index (CVI) in an eye with retinal detachment and the fellow eye of a patient with monocular primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed optical coherence tomography data of both eyes at the first visit of patients who underwent surgery for monocular RRD from January 2017 to January 2018. The subfoveal CVIs of the RD eye, the fellow eye, and the postoperative 3-months RD eye were analyzed using Image J software by two independent ophthalmologists.

Results: Forty-five subjects were included. Of the 45 RD eyes, 25 eyes (55.6%) showed macula invasion. The subfoveal CVI was statistically lower in the RD eye compared with the fellow eye (65.61 ¡¾ 3.37 vs. 67.28 ¡¾ 3.44, respectively; p = 0.024). In the macula-on RD group, the preoperative subfoveal CVI was statistically higher than the subfoveal CVI of postoperative 3 months (67.62 ¡¾ 2.35 vs. 65.84 ¡¾ 3.04, respectively; p = 0.009). However, the preoperative subfoveal CVI was statistically lower than the subfoveal CVI of postoperative 3 months in the macula-off RD group (64.01 ¡¾ 3.21 vs. 66.69 ¡¾ 2.64, respectively; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: In primary RRD eyes, the subfoveal CVI was lower in the RD eye compared to the fellow eye. In macula-off RD eyes, the subfoveal CVI was lower in preoperative RD eyes compared to postoperative RD eyes. The subfoveal CVI was higher in the preoperative RD eyes compared to postoperative RD eyes in macula-on RD eyes. Further studies are needed to investigate the effects of RD on changes in the lumina and stoma in the choroid.

Å°¿öµå

Choroidal vascularity index; Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment; Subfoveal area

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS