Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÀ±Þ½Ç¿¡¼­ Áö¿¬ Áø´ÜµÈ ±Þ¼ºÆó¼â°¢³ì³»Àå ȯÀÚ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °íÂû Clinical Features of Delayed Diagnosed Acute Angle Closure Glaucoma in an Emergency Room

´ëÇѾȰúÇÐȸÁö 2020³â 61±Ç 12È£ p.1500 ~ 1506
¹ÚÁö¿õ, ¼­»ù, ÀÌÁ¾Àº,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹ÚÁö¿õ ( Park Ji-Woong ) 
Keimyung University School of Medicine Department of Ophthalmology

¼­»ù ( Seo Sam ) 
Cheil Eye Hospital
ÀÌÁ¾Àº ( Lee Chong-Eun ) 
Keimyung University School of Medicine Department of Ophthalmology

Abstract

¸ñÀû: ÀÀ±Þ½Ç¿¡ ³»¿øÇÑ ±Þ¼ºÆó¼â°¢³ì³»Àå ȯÀÚ Áß ½Å°æÇÐÀû ÁúȯÀ¸·Î ¿ÀÀεǾî Áö¿¬ Áø´ÜµÈ ȯÀÚµéÀÇ ÀÓ»óƯ¡À» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù.
´ë»ó°ú ¹æ¹ý: ÀÀ±Þ½ÇÀ» ÅëÇØ ³»¿øÇÏ¿© ±Þ¼ºÆó¼â°¢³ì³»ÀåÀ¸·Î Áø´Ü ¹ÞÀº 77¸í(77¾È)¸íÀÇ È¯ÀÚµéÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ³ªÀÌ, ¼ºº°, ¾ÈÃøº° ºÐÆ÷, ³»¿ø ´ç½Ã ÃÖ´ë±³Á¤½Ã·Â, ÀÌÈÄ ¿Ü·¡·Î ÃßÀû °üÂû½Ã ÀÌȯµÈ ´«ÀÇ ÃÖ´ë±³Á¤½Ã·Â, ³»¿ø ´ç½Ã ¾È¾Ð, ¾È°ú Áúȯ·Â, ¾È°ú¼ö¼ú·Â, ´ë»ç¼ºÁõÈıºÀ» Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ Àü½ÅÁúȯ °ú°Å·Â, ÀÌÀü ½Å°æÇÐÀû Áúȯ·Â, ³»¿ø °æ·Î, ÁÖÈ£¼Ò Áõ»ó, ÆíµÎÅë °ú°Å·Â, °ÅÁÖÁö, ÀÀ±Þ½Ç ÃÊÁø Àǻ縦 È®ÀÎÇÏ¿© ½Å°æÇÐÀû ÁúȯÀ¸·Î ¿ÀÀεǾî Áö¿¬ Áø´ÜµÉ À§Çè¿äÀÎÀ» Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú: 77¸í Áß¿¡ Áö¿¬ Áø´ÜµÈ ±ºÀº 34¸í, Àû½Ã Áø´ÜµÈ ±ºÀº 43¸íÀ̾ú´Ù. µÎ ±º¿¡¼­ ÀÀ±Þ½Ç ³»¿ø ´ç½Ã ÃÖ´ë±³Á¤½Ã·ÂÀÌ ³·Àº °æ¿ì(p=0.001), ¾È°ú Àü¹®ÀǸ¦ ÅëÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀº ³»¿ø °æ·Î·Î ÀÀ±Þ½Ç·Î ¹æ¹®ÇÑ °æ¿ì(p<0.001), ¾È¿Ü Áõ»óÀÌ ÁÖÈ£¼Ò Áõ»óÀ̾ú´ø °æ¿ì(p<0.001), ÀÀ±Þ½Ç ÃÊÁø ÀÇ»çÀÇ Àü¹® °ú¸ñÀÌ ¾È°ú°¡ ¾Æ´Ñ °æ¿ì(p<0.001)¿¡¼­ Áö¿¬ Áø´ÜµÈ °æ¿ì°¡ ¸¹¾Ò´Ù. Ä¡·á Àü ¾È¾Ð, ¾È°ú Áúȯ·Â, ¾È°ú¼ö¼ú·Â, ´ë»ç¼º ÁõÈıºÀ» Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ Àü½ÅÁúȯ °ú°Å·Â, ÀÌÀü ½Å°æ°úÀû Áúȯ·Â, ÆíµÎÅë °ú°Å·Â, °ÅÁÖÁö ¿äÀÎÀº Áö¿¬ Áø´Ü ¿©ºÎ¿Í À¯ÀÇÇÑ °ü°è¸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù.

°á·Ð: ÀÀ±Þ½Ç·Î ³»¿øÇÑ ±Þ¼ºÆó¼â°¢³ì³»Àå ȯÀÚ Áß Áö¿¬ Áø´ÜµÇ´Â °æ¿ì°¡ ¸¹¾Æ ÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÇØ ÁÖÀǸ¦ ¿äÇÑ´Ù. ÀÀ±Þ½Ç¿¡ ³»¿øÇÑ ¾ÈÁõ»óÀ» µ¿¹ÝÇÑ È¯ÀÚ¿¡¼­ ¾È°ú ÀÇ»çÀÇ Á¤È®ÇÑ º´·ÂûÃë°¡ ±Þ¼ºÆó¼â°¢³ì³»ÀåÀ» Àû½Ã¿¡ Áø´ÜÇÏ´Â µ¥ µµ¿òÀÌ µÉ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÈ´Ù.

Purpose: To analyze the clinical features of delayed diagnosed acute angle-closure glaucoma (AACG) patients who were misdiagnosed with neurologic disease in an emergency room (ER).

Methods: This study was conducted with a total of 77 patients (77 eyes) who had been diagnosed with AACG in the ER. Age, gender, laterality, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of the affected eye at the time of the ER visit and at an outpatient clinic follow-up examination, bilateral intraocular pressure (IOP) at time of visit, previous eye-disease history, previous history of ophthalmic surgery, underlying systemic disease including metabolic syndrome, previous neurologic disease history, referral source, chief complaint, past history of migraine, residence, and specialty of the initial doctor in charge of the ER were statistically analyzed.

Results: Among the 77 patients, 34 received a delayed diagnosis and 43 were diagnosed in a timely manner. Higher cases of delayed diagnosis were observed in patients who had lower BCVA at the time of the ER visit (p = 0.001), nonophthalmologic referral source visiting the ER (p < 0.001), a chief complaint of extra-ocular symptoms (p < 0.001), and a non-ophthalmologist as the initial doctor in charge of the ER (p < 0.001). None of the other factors, including IOP, previous eye-disease history, previous ophthalmic surgery, underlying systemic disease including metabolic syndrome, previous neurologic disease history, past history of migraine, or residence showed any statistically significant intergroup difference.

Conclusions: Among the AACG patients visiting the ER, many were delayed in their diagnosis and thus required much attention afterwards. Careful examination and a detailed recording of a patient¡¯s medical history by an ophthalmologist is important for accurate and timely diagnosis in the ER.

Å°¿öµå

Acute angle closure glaucoma; Diagnostic errors; Emergency room; Headache

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS