WilmsÁ¾¾çÀÇ ÀÓ»ó ¹× º´¸®Á¶Á÷ÇÐÀû ¼Ò°ß¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¿¹ÈÄÆÇÁ¤
Wilms Tumor-Clinicopathologic Variation and Prognosis
¹ÚöÈñ, ±Ç°Ç¿°, ±è±¤¼¼, À̼ºÁØ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹ÚöÈñ ( )
°è¸í´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
±Ç°Ç¿° ( )
°è¸í´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ º´¸®Çб³½Ç
±è±¤¼¼ ( )
°è¸í´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
À̼ºÁØ ( )
°è¸í´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºñ´¢±â°úÇб³½Ç
KMID : 0360319890210010101
Abstract
A histologic classification based on tumor differentiation, degree of tubular formation and favor-able histology versus unfavorable histology was applied in a retrospective study of 21 patients with Wilms tumor to determine if it might provide an index to prognosis from 1977 through 1987.
A comparison of the histologic findings with survival through statistical analysis was undertaken and it was found that the histologic classification was significantly correlated with survival.
The results were as follows:
1. Low grade tumors(grade I) with predominance of differwtiated tubules & glomeruli were associated with better survival rate than high grade tumors(grade ¥²) composed mainly of undifferentiated spindle elements: 2-year survival rate was 100% for grade I with 11% for grade ¥² (p<0.01).
2. Survival rate was lower for the low degree of tubular formation than for the high degree of tubular formation: 2-year survival rate were 10o¢¥, 50%, 75%, 100% for group 0, +, ++, and +++ respectively(p < 0.05).
3. 11 patients with the focal or diffuse anaplasia and sarcomatous stroma (unfavorable histology) had poor prognosis, giving 36% of 2-year survival rate but 10 patients with favorable histology had 70% of 2-year survival rate (p<0.05).
Å°¿öµå
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸