Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

À¯¹æ¾ÏȯÀÚÀÇ È¿¼Ò¸é¿ª¹ý°ú ¸é¿ªÁ¶Á÷È­Çйý¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ È£¸£¸ó¼ö¿ëü, Á¶Á÷ÇÐÀû ºÐÈ­µµ ¹× À¯¹æÂû¿µ¼ú ¼Ò°ß°úÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è Relation Between Hormone Receptor(Enzyme-Immunoassay and Immuno- histochemistry), Histologic Grade and Mammographic Findings in Patients with Primary Breast Cancer

´ëÇѾÏÇÐȸÁö 1997³â 29±Ç 1È£ p.53 ~ 61
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
°­º´Ã¶/Byung Chul Kang ¿À±â±Ù/±èÀç±Ù/Á¤¿ìÈñ/ÀÌÈñ´ë/¼Û°æ¼ø/Ki Keun Oh/Jae Keun Kim/Woo Hee Jung/Hy De Lee/Kyung Soon Song

Abstract

¼­·Ð
À¯¹æ¾ÏȯÀÚÀÇ ¿¹ÈÄ¿Í ¿©·¯ ÀÎÀÚµé°úÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ ¹àÈ÷·Á´Â ¸¹Àº ½Ãµµ°¡ ÀÖ¾î¿Ô°í À̵éÀº
¿¬±¸ÀÚ³ª ¿¬±¸¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¶ó¼­ ¼­·Î ´Ù¸¥ °á°ú¸¦ º¸°íÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù. È£¸£¸ó ¼ö¿ëü¿Í ¿¹ÈÄÀÇ »ó
°ü°ü°è¿¡ °üÇÑ ÃÖ±Ù º¸°í¿¡ ÀÇÇϸé È£¸£¸ó ¼ö¿ëü ƯÈ÷ ¿¡½ºÆ®·Î°Õ¼ö¿ëüÀÇ ¼öÄ¡°¡ ³ô°Å³ª
¾ç¼ºÀΠȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ È£¸£¸ó¿ä¹ýÀ¸·Î Ä¡·áÇÑ °æ¿ì, ³ôÀº »ýÁ¸À²À» º¸°íÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ º´¸®ÇÐÀû
¼Ò°ß¿¡ µû¸¥ ¿¹ÈÄÀÇ Â÷À̵µ º¸°íÇÏ°í Àִµ¥, ´Ù¼öÀÇ Çٺп­À²(high mitotic rate), ÇÙÀÇ ¿ª
ºÐÈ­(nuclear anaplasia) ¹× Àú¼¼Æ÷ ºÐÈ­µµ(poor cellular differentiation)µî°ú °°Àº Á¶Á÷ÇÐÀû
Ư¡µéÀº ÀϹÝÀûÀ¸·Î ³ª»Û ¿¹Èĸ¦ ³ªÅ¸³»´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ¾Ë·ÁÁ® ÀÖ´Ù. ÃÖ±Ù À¯¹æ¾Ï ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ Ä¡
·áÀÇ ÁöħÀ¸·Î ¸¹ÀÌ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Â È¿¼Ò¸é¿ª¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¿¡½ºÆ®·Î°Õ¼ö¿ëüÀÇ ¼öÄ¡¿Í ¸é¿ªÁ¶Á÷
È­Çйý¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¿°»öÁ¤µµÀÇ »ó°ü¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »ó¹ÝµÈ º¸°í°¡ ÀÖ¾î, À¯¹æ¾ÏȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ Ä¡·áÀÇ Áöħ
ÀÌ µÇ°Å³ª ¿¹ÈÄ ÀÎÀڷμ­ ÁöħÀÌ µÉ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¿¡½ºÆ®·Î°Õ¼ö¿ëüÀÇ ½ÇÇè¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¶ó ¾ò¾îÁø
°á°ú¿¡ ´ëÇØ °´°üÀûÀÎ °ËÁ¤ÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ »óÅÂÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ ÀúÀÚµéÀº À¯¹æ¾ÏȯÀڵ鿡¼­ È¿¼Ò¸é¿ª
¹ý°ú ¸é¿ªÁ¶Á÷¿°»ö¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ È£¸£¸ó¼ö¿ëüÁß Æ¯È÷ ¿¡½ºÆ®·Î°Õ¼ö¿ëü¿Í Á¶Á÷ÇÐÀû ºÐÈ­µµ ¹×
À¯¹æÃÔ¿µ¼ú ¼Ò°ß°úÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ ¾Ë¾Æº½À¸·Î½á À¯¹æ¾Ï ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ¿¹ÈÄ ÀÎÀڷμ­ÀÇ À¯¹æÃÔ¿µ
¼ú ¼Ò°ßÀÇ °¡´É¼ºÀ» »ìÆ캸¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, ÇöÀç Ä¡·áÀÇ ÁöħÀ¸·Î »ç¿ëÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Â È¿¼Ò¸é¿ª¹ý°ú ¸é¿ª
Á¶Á÷¿°»ö¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¿¡½ºÆ®·Î°Õ¼ö¿ëüÀÇ °´°üÀûÀÎ »ó°ü¼º ¿©ºÎ¸¦ °ËÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
Purpose : To evaluate the relationship between the hormone receptor status, histologic
grade and, the film-mammographic findings in primary breast cancer.
Materials and Methods : 198 breast cancer patients with hormonal receptor assay were
included in this study. Estrogen receptor(ER) and progesterone receptor(PR) were
determined by immunohistochemical method and enzyme-immunoassay. And film -
mammographic findings were evaluated to disclose the relationship among the three
variables (film-mammographic findings, histologic grade and hormonal receptor status).
Film-mammographic findings of the breast cancer are classified as spiculation, increased
parenchymal density, calcification and mass.
Results : There is no correlation between estrogen receptor and histologic grade in
154 patients. Some correlation between estrogen receptor by enzyme-immunoassay and
by immunohistochemistrical methods with 28 available data were observed(R=0.428).
Among high estrogen receptor(ER) patients, there is a high possibility of spiculation or
mass in mammography with 79 available data(Modified t-test, p<0.01).
Conclusion : Spiculation or/and mass of the mammography can be related to the high
possibile factor of the positive estrogen receptor or high level of estrogen receptor in
primary breast cancer.

Å°¿öµå

Breast cancer; Mammography; Hormone receptor(estrogen receptor);

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KoreaMed
KAMS