Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÁøÇ༺ ºñ¼Ò¼¼Æ÷ Æó¾Ï¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Cisplatin, Ifosfamide, °æ±¸ Etoposide º¹ÇÕÈ­Çпä¹ýÀÇ È¿°ú Clinical Efficacy of Combination Chemotherapy with Cisplatin, Ifosfamide, and Oral Etoposide (PIE) in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

´ëÇѾÏÇÐȸÁö 1999³â 31±Ç 2È£ p.297 ~ 305
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è¿­È«/Yeul Hong Kim ¼­ÀçÈ«/±èº´¼ö/½Å»ó¿ø/½ÉÀçÁ¤/°­°æÈ£/ÃÖ¿µÈ£/±è±¤ÅÃ/±èÁؼ®/Jae Hong Seo/Byung Soo Kim/Sang Won Shin/Jae Jung Shim/Kyung Ho Kang/Young Ho Choi/Kwang Tak Kim/Jun Suk Kim

Abstract

¼­·Ð
Cisplatin°ú etoposide´Â ºñ¼Ò¼¼Æ÷ Æä¾Ï ȯÀÚ¿¡ À־ ´Üµ¶ Åõ¿©½Ã ¹ÝÀÀ·üÀÌ °¢°¢ 15¡­
30%¿Í 7¡­9%À̳ª º´ÇÕ Åõ¿©ÇÒ °æ¿ì ¹ÝÀÀ·üÀÌ 20¡­40%·Î Çâ»óµÇ¾ú´Ù´Â °á°úµéÀÌ ´Ù¼ö º¸
°íµÈ ÈÄ À̸¥¹Ù cisplatin°ú etoposideÀÇ º´¿ë¿ä¹ý(EP)Àº ÁøÇ༺ ºñ¼Ò¼¼Æ÷ Æó¾ÏÀÇ Ç¥ÁØÀûÀÎ
Ä¡·áÀÇ Çϳª·Î ÀÎÁ¤¹Þ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ifosfamide´Â 104¸íÀÇ ÁøÇ༺ ºñ¼Ò¼¼Æ÷ Æó¾Ï ȯÀÚ¸¦ ´ë
»óÀ¸·Î ÇÑ ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­ ´Üµ¶ Ä¡·á½Ã 32%ÀÇ ³ôÀº ¹ÝÀÀ·üÀÌ º¸°íµÈ °¡Àå È¿°úÀûÀÎ Ç×¾ÏÁ¦Áß ÇÏ
³ªÀÌ´Ù. Ifosfamide´Â cisplatinÀ̳ª etoposide¿Í´Â ´Þ¸® °ñ¼ö±â´É¾ïÁ¦°¡ ¹Ì¾àÇÑ ¹Ý¸é mesna
ÀÇ Åõ¿©·Î ¿¹¹æÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÑ ¹æ±¤¿°ÀÌ ÁÖ¿äÇÑ ¿ë·®Á¦ÇÑ µ¶¼º(dose limiting toxicity)À¸·Î ¾Ë·Á
Á® ÀÖ¾î cisplatin, etoposide¿Í ¿ë·®Á¦ÇÑ µ¶¼ºÀÌ °ãÄ¡Áö ¾ÊÀ¸¹Ç·Î À̵é Á¦Á¦¿Í ¾ÈÀüÇÏ°Ô º´
ÇÕ Åõ¿©ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÀåÁ¡ÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ÁøÇ༺ ºñ¼Ò¼¼Æ÷ Æó¾Ï ȯÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î EP º¹ÇÕÇ×
¾ÏÈ­Çпä¹ý¿¡ ifosfamide¸¦ Ãß°¡ÇÑ PIE º¹ÇÕÇ×¾ÏÈ­Çпä¹ýÀÇ Ä¡·á¼ºÀûÀº 30¡­40%·Î EP ¿ä¹ý
¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© ¶Ñ·ÇÇÑ Çâ»óÀº °üÂûµÇÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù.
Etoposide¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÑ Àӻ󿬱¸´Â 1972³âºÎÅÍ ½ÃµµµÇ¾î ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¾ÏÀÇ Ä¡·á¿¡ È¿°úÀûÀ̶ó´Â
»ç½ÇÀÌ º¸°íµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç ´Ù¾çÇÑ Àü ÀÓ»ó°ú ÀÓ»ó ¿¬±¸¸¦ ÅëÇÏ¿© Çѹø Åõ¿©ÇÏ´Â Ä¡·áº¸´Ù ¿©·¯
Â÷·Ê¿¡ °ÉÃÄ ³ª´©¾î Åõ¿©ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ Ä¡·áÈ¿°ú°¡ ÁÁÀº Áï, schedule-dependentÈ¿°ú°¡ ÀÖÀ½ÀÌ
ÀÔÁõµÈ ¹Ù ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °á°ú´Â etoposide¸¦ ¾ÏÁ¶Á÷¿¡ Àå±â°£ ³ëÃâ½ÃÅ°¸é Ä¡·áÈ¿°ú°¡ Çâ»óµÉ
°ÍÀ» ÀǹÌÇÑ´Ù. ªÀº ±â°£ Á¤¸ÆÁÖ»ç·Î etoposide¸¦ Åõ¿©ÇÏ´Â °Íº¸´Ù Àå±â°£ etoposideÀÇ Ç÷
Á߳󵵸¦ À¯ÁöÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© °æ±¸ etoposide°¡ °³¹ßµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç °æ±¸ etoposide¸¦ 14ÀÏ È¤Àº 21ÀÏ
°£ Áö¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î °æ±¸ Åõ¿©ÇÏ´Â ¿¬±¸´Â ¼Ò¼¼Æ÷ Æó¾Ï, ºñ¼Ò¼¼Æ÷ Æó¾Ï, ºñÈ£ÁöŲ ¸²ÇÁÁ¾,
germ-cell tumor, ³­¼Ò¾Ï µî¿¡¼­ ½ÃµµµÇ¾î È¿°ú°¡ º¸°íµÈ ¹Ù ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­ÀÇ °á°ú´Â
¾à 1§­/§¢ÀÇ etoposide ³óµµºÎÅÍ È¿°ú°¡ ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ÀÎÁ¤µÇ´Â ¹Ý¸é 3§­/§¢ ÀÌ»óÀÇ ÃÖ°íÇ÷Áß
³óµµ´Â ½ÉÇÑ °ñ¼ö¾ïÁ¦ ¹ß»ý°ú ¿¬°üµÇ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ¾Ë·ÁÁö°í ÀÖ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ °í³óµµÀÇ ³ëÃâ¾øÀÌ
Áö¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î ³·Àº etoposide Ç÷Á߳󵵸¦ À¯ÁöÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ÀÌ»óÀûÀÎ Åõ¿©¹æ¹ýÀÏ °ÍÀÌ´Ù. °ú°Å¿¡
Ä¡·á¹ÞÀº °ú°Å·ÂÀÌ ¾ø´Â ºñ¼Ò¼¼Æ÷ Æó¾ÏȯÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î 21ÀÏ°£ °æ±¸ etoposide¸¦ ´Üµ¶ Åõ¿©
ÇÑ ¿¬±¸°á°ú ÁߵÀÇ È¿°ú°¡ °üÂûµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç platinum Á¦Á¦ÀÎ cisplatin ȤÀº carboplatin°úÀÇ
º´ÇÕ¿ä¹ý °á°ú´Â ¸Å¿ì °í¹«ÀûÀ̾ú´Ù.
±×·¯³ª, ÁøÇ༺ ºñ¼Ò¼¼Æ÷¾Ï¿¡ ´ëÇÑ º» °æ±¸¿ä¹ý¿¡ ifosfamide¸¦ Ãß°¡ÇÑ º¹ÇÕÇ×¾ÏÈ­Çпä¹ý
ÀÇ È¿°ú¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿©´Â ÇöÀç ¾Ë·ÁÁ® ÀÖÁö ¾Ê´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, °æ±¸ etoposide ¹× cisplatin º¹ÇÕÇ×¾ÏÈ­ÇÐ
¿ä¹ýÀÇ ±¹³»¿¡¼­ÀÇ º¸°íµµ ã¾Æ º¼ ¼ö ¾ø´Â ½ÇÁ¤ÀÌ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ±âÁ¸ÀÇ È¿°úÀû
ÀÎ ºñ¼Ò¼¼Æ÷ Æó¾ÏÀÇ Ç×¾ÏÄ¡·á¿ä¹ýÀÎ ÁÖ»ç etoposide ¹× cisplatinÀÇ º¹ÇÕÇ×¾ÏÈ­Çпä¹ýÀ» ±Ù°£
À¸·Î etoposide¸¦ °æ±¸Åõ¿©·Î ÀüȯÇÏ¿© Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ Ç÷Áß³óµµÀÇ À¯Áö¸¦ ²ÒÇÏ°í, ÀÌ¿¡
ifosfamide¸¦ Ãß°¡ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á Ç×¾ÏÈ¿°úÀÇ Áõ°­ Á¤µµ ¹× ºÎÀÛ¿ëÀ» ÆľÇÇÏ¿© º¸°íÇÏ´Â ¹ÙÀÌ´Ù.

Purpose : A prolonged administration of etoposide increases its effectiveness on the
suggestion that prolonged maintenance of low levels is an important factor in
determining its activity. Many studies have been tried to define the efficacy of
combination of oral etoposide with other chemotherapeutic drugs such as cisplatin, 5-FU,
and ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this
study, we evaluated the effectiveness and toxicities of combination chemotherapy of oral
etoposide with intravenous cisplatin and ifosfamide in advanced NSCLC patients.
Materials and Methods : Thirty-three patients with inoperable NSCLC who had
measurable diseases and had not been treated with chemotherapeutic drug, were enrolled
in this study (from May 1995 to April 1998). Treatment consisted of intravenous
cisplatin (20§·/m2/day, Day 1-3) and ifosfamide (1,800 §·
/m2/day, Days 1-3) with Mesna (1,100 §·/m2/day, Days 1-3),
and oral etoposide (50 §·/m2/day, Days 4-17). This treatment was repeated
every 4 weeks. Patients showing stable disease or a better response were continued on
treatment with the range of one to nine cycles (medium. 3 cycles). All patients were
evaluated for the response, survival, and toxicity of this combination chemotherapy.
Results : Eleven patients showed either complete responses [CR, 3 (9%)] or partial
responses [PR, 8 (24%)]. The median number of treatment cycles were 5 (range, 3-9)
for responders and 2 (range, 1-7) for non-responders. The responders had median
response duration of 10 months and the overall survival of 12 months. The overall
survival of responders were longer than that of non-responders (median 19 vs 5
months, p=0.0232). The toxicities of this treatment were tolerable without treatment
related death. Limiting toxicities were myelosuppression and oral mucosities. Grade 3 or
4 leukopenia and oral mucosities were observed in 34% and 9%, respectively.
Conclusion : The combination of cisplatin, ifosfamide, and oral etoposide produced
encouraging response rates and median survival duration in patients with response.
Further study of this combination is warranted in comparison with standard cisplatin +
etoposide regimen or intravenous etoposide, cisplatin and ifosfamide regimen.

Å°¿öµå

Ifosfamide; Cisplatin; Oral etoposide; Non-small cell lung cancer; Chemotherapy;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KoreaMed
KAMS