Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

À¯°ü »óÇdz»¾Ï(DCIS)¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÓ»óÀû, º´¸®ÇÐÀû ºÐ¼® ¹× »ý¹°ÇÐÀû Ç¥ÁöÀÚµéÀÇ ¹ßÇö°ú ¿¹ÈÄÀÎÀÚµé°úÀÇ °ü°è Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) of the Breast; Clinico-pathological Analysis, Expression of Molecular Markers, and Correlations between Known Prognostic Factors

´ëÇÑ¿Ü°úÇÐȸÁö 2003³â 64±Ç 4È£ p.289 ~ 295
°­¼º¼ö, °í½Â»ó, Á¶¹éÇö, Çã¹ÎÈñ, ÀÌÇØ°æ, À̼º°ø, ÀüÀÌ°æ, ±èÀÇÁ¤, ÀÌ°æ»ó, È«¼º¶õ, ÀÌÁöÇö,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
°­¼º¼ö ( Kang Sung-Soo ) 
¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »ï¼ºÁ¦ÀϺ´¿ø ¿Ü°ú

°í½Â»ó ( Ko Seung-Sang ) 
¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »ï¼ºÁ¦ÀϺ´¿ø ¿Ü°ú
Á¶¹éÇö ( Cho Back-Hyun ) 
¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »ï¼ºÁ¦ÀϺ´¿ø ¿Ü°ú
Çã¹ÎÈñ ( Hur Min-Hee ) 
¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »ï¼ºÁ¦ÀϺ´¿ø ¿Ü°ú
ÀÌÇØ°æ ( Lee Hae-Kyung ) 
¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »ï¼ºÁ¦ÀϺ´¿ø ¿Ü°ú
À̼º°ø ( Lee Sung-Kong ) 
¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »ï¼ºÁ¦ÀϺ´¿ø ¿Ü°ú
ÀüÀÌ°æ ( Chun Yee-Kyung ) 
¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »ï¼ºÁ¦ÀϺ´¿ø Çغκ´¸®°ú
±èÀÇÁ¤ ( Kim Yee-Jeong ) 
¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »ï¼ºÁ¦ÀϺ´¿ø Çغκ´¸®°ú
ÀÌ°æ»ó ( Lee Kyung-Sang ) 
¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »ï¼ºÁ¦ÀϺ´¿ø Áø´Ü¹æ»ç¼±°ú
È«¼º¶õ ( Hong Sung-Ran ) 
¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »ï¼ºÁ¦ÀϺ´¿ø Çغκ´¸®°ú
ÀÌÁöÇö ( Lee Jee-Hyun ) 
¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »ï¼ºÁ¦ÀϺ´¿ø ¿Ü°ú

Abstract


PURPOSE: The improved availability of breast cancer screening, including mammography, has dramatically increased the detection rate of DCIS (ductal carcinoma in situ). However, there has been controversy regarding the clinico-pathological
characteristics and optimal management of DCIS. This analysis was conducted in order to evaluate the clinico-pathological findings of DCIS, and any possible correlations between the known prognostic factors.

METHODS: We analyzed 58 consecutive cases of DCIS, from 1990 to 1995, including data on the annual proportion of DCIS to total breast cancer cases, the clinico-pathological characteristics and the expressions of ER, PR, c-erbB-2 and p53. The median length of follow-up was 98.5 months.

RESULTS: The proportion of DCIS was 8.8%, with progressive increases from 1990 to 1995. The mean age at diagnosis was 47.1 years, with the peak of prevalence seen in women aged 40~49 years. The most common presentation was a palpable breast mass in 28 (48.3%) cases, but 18 (31%) patients were asymptomatic. The mammographic findings demonstrated calcification in 75% and mass density in 59.6%. There was only 1 (1.8%) case of a bilateral lesion, and 5 (8.6%) of multifocal or multicentric lesions. Axillary lymph nodes were positive in 5.5% of the patients who underwent an axillary dissection. Breast conserving operations were performed in 8 (13.8%) cases. The frequencies of ER, PR, c-erbB-2 and p53, positivity, by immunohistochemistry were 52, 50, 55.1 and 30.6%, respectively. c-erbB-2 immunoreactivity was found more often in DCIS with larger size, higher nuclear grade and negative ER and PR (P=0.011, P=0.001, P=0.002, and P=0.006, respectively). There was a significant association between higher nuclear grade and negative ER and PR, and comedotype (P=0.001, P=0.000, and 0.008, respectively). Although an invasive ductal carcinoma had developed in 5.4% of the contralateral breasts, there were no cases of systemic relapse, or disease-specific mortality, at the last follow-up.

Å°¿öµå

À¯¹æ¾Ï;À¯°ü»óÇdz»¾Ï;»ý¹°ÇÐÀû Ç¥ÁöÀÚ
Breast cancer;Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS);Molecular markers

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS