Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

½ÉÀüµµ¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Á᫐ Á¤¸Æ µµ°ü»ðÀÔ Central Vein Catheterization with an Electrocardiogram

´ëÇÑ¿Ü°úÇÐȸÁö 2004³â 67±Ç 3È£ p.231 ~ 234
À̵µ»ó, ¼ÕâÈñ, ¹éÁ¾¹Î, ¼º±â¿µ, ±è¿í, ¹ÚÀÏ¿µ, ¿øÁ¾¸¸,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À̵µ»ó ( Lee Do-Sang ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ¼º°¡º´¿ø ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

¼ÕâÈñ ( Sohn Chang-Hee ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ¼º°¡º´¿ø ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
¹éÁ¾¹Î ( Baek Jong-Min ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ¼º°¡º´¿ø ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
¼º±â¿µ ( Sung Gi-Young ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ¼º°¡º´¿ø ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
±è¿í ( Kim Wook ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ¼º°¡º´¿ø ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
¹ÚÀÏ¿µ ( Park Il-Young ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ¼º°¡º´¿ø ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
¿øÁ¾¸¸ ( Won Jong-Man ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ¼º°¡º´¿ø ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract


PURPOSE: This study analyzed the value of an electrocardiogram (ECG) using an arterial pulsator in central vein catheterization (CVC).

METHODS: In 442 patients who underwent CVC with an ECG and an arterial pulsator, this study evaluated the rates of change in the P wave and the QRS wave at the limb lead II before and after insertion. After insertion, a plain chest X-ray was checked in order to locate the catheter tip.

RESULTS: After catheterization, the P wave and the QRS wave increased together at 97% but the P wave (change rate: 0.5~21.0) was more sensitive than the QRS wave (change rate: 0.5~5.8). For an abnormal location (3%), the rate of change in the P wave was <2.0 and that of the QRS wave was <1.4. The sensitivity and the specificity of the P wave >2.0 were 95% and 100%, and those of the QRS wave >1.4 were 90% and 100%.

CONCLUSION: In central vein catheterization, an electrocardiogram with an arterial pulsator can be a useful method, and the normal position of the catheter tip can be estimated by using a rate of change in the P wave >2.0 or a rate of change in QRS wave >1.4.

Å°¿öµå

Á᫐ Á¤¸Æ µµ°ü»ðÀÔ; ½ÉÀüµµ; Central vein catheterization; Electrocardiogram

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS