½ÉÀüµµ¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Á᫐ Á¤¸Æ µµ°ü»ðÀÔ
Central Vein Catheterization with an Electrocardiogram
À̵µ»ó, ¼ÕâÈñ, ¹éÁ¾¹Î, ¼º±â¿µ, ±è¿í, ¹ÚÀÏ¿µ, ¿øÁ¾¸¸,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À̵µ»ó ( Lee Do-Sang )
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ¼º°¡º´¿ø ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
¼ÕâÈñ ( Sohn Chang-Hee )
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ¼º°¡º´¿ø ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
¹éÁ¾¹Î ( Baek Jong-Min )
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ¼º°¡º´¿ø ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
¼º±â¿µ ( Sung Gi-Young )
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ¼º°¡º´¿ø ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
񊨡 ( Kim Wook )
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ¼º°¡º´¿ø ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
¹ÚÀÏ¿µ ( Park Il-Young )
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ¼º°¡º´¿ø ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
¿øÁ¾¸¸ ( Won Jong-Man )
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ¼º°¡º´¿ø ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
KMID : 0371320040670030231
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study analyzed the value of an electrocardiogram (ECG) using an arterial pulsator in central vein catheterization (CVC).
METHODS: In 442 patients who underwent CVC with an ECG and an arterial pulsator, this study evaluated the rates of change in the P wave and the QRS wave at the limb lead II before and after insertion. After insertion, a plain chest X-ray was checked in order to locate the catheter tip.
RESULTS: After catheterization, the P wave and the QRS wave increased together at 97% but the P wave (change rate: 0.5~21.0) was more sensitive than the QRS wave (change rate: 0.5~5.8). For an abnormal location (3%), the rate of change in the P wave was <2.0 and that of the QRS wave was <1.4. The sensitivity and the specificity of the P wave >2.0 were 95% and 100%, and those of the QRS wave >1.4 were 90% and 100%.
CONCLUSION: In central vein catheterization, an electrocardiogram with an arterial pulsator can be a useful method, and the normal position of the catheter tip can be estimated by using a rate of change in the P wave >2.0 or a rate of change in QRS wave >1.4.
Å°¿öµå
Á᫐ Á¤¸Æ µµ°ü»ðÀÔ; ½ÉÀüµµ; Central vein catheterization; Electrocardiogram
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸