응급의료기금 지원 사업 평가를 위한 델파이 연구
Delphi study to evaluate the emergency medical system operation fund support projects
이선영, 손유동, 신상도, 송경준, 홍기환, 노영선, 김태한, 박정호, 박관진, 고서영, 이승철, 정유진, 문성배,
소속 상세정보
이선영 ( Lee Sun-Young )
서울대학교병원 응급의학과(소방청)
손유동 ( Shon You-Dong )
서울특별시보라매병원 응급의학과
신상도 ( Shin Sang-Do )
서울대학교병원 응급의학과(소방청)
송경준 ( Song Kyoung-Jun )
서울특별시보라매병원 응급의학과
홍기환 ( Hong Ki-Hwan )
서울대학교병원 응급의학과(소방청)
노영선 ( Ro Young-Sun )
서울대학교병원 응급의학과(소방청)
김태한 ( Kim Tae-Han )
서울대학교병원 응급의학과(소방청)
박정호 ( Park Jeong-Ho )
서울대학교병원 응급의학과(소방청)
박관진 ( Park Gwan-Jin )
충북대학교병원 응급의학과
고서영 ( Ko Seo-Young )
제주대학교병원 응급의학과
이승철 ( Lee Seung-Chul )
동국대학교 일산병원 응급의학과
정유진 ( Jung Eu-Jene )
전남대학교병원 응급의학과
문성배 ( Moon Sung-Bae )
경북대학교병원 응급의학과
KMID : 0385920190300040328
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to achieve expert consensus for the evaluation of Emergency medical system operation fund (EMSOF) support projects using the Delphi method in Korea.
Method: The Delphi study was performed in June 2018. Experts who are members of the policy committee of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine (KSEM) participated in the study. Respondents were asked to express their level of agreement of appropriateness for the following 6 categories for 21 projects: project contents, amount of support, indicators, performance, overall evaluation, and need to maintain. With a possible score of 9 points, the project categories were classified into 3 groups, inappropriate, moderate and appropriate, based on the median score of the respondents’ ratings in each question.
Results: Sixteen of the 18 policy committee members participated in the survey. Their average professional work years were 8.2 years. All 21 projects were evaluated as appropriate for content. Amount of support and indicators were evaluated as moderate. Only 5 out of the 21 projects were evaluated as having appropriate indicators. No projects were evaluated as ineffective. Comprehensive evaluation of the projects was evaluated as moderate, and no project was evaluated as inappropriate in fund support.
Conclusion: Overall, the contents of the EMSOF assistance project were rated high; however, there was a disagreement on the amount of support and evaluation indicators for each project. The results of this study are expected to be used as basic data to improve the use of EMSOF.
키워드
Emergency medical services (EMS); Delphi technique; Resource allocation
원문 및 링크아웃 정보
등재저널 정보