ÀÏ°³ Áö¿ª ±¸±Þ´ë¿øÀÇ ¾÷¹« ÇöȲ ¹× Á÷Á¢ÀÇ·áÁöµµ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±¸±Þ´ë¿ø°ú ÀÇ·áÁöµµÀÇ»çÀÇ ÀÎ½Ä Á¶»ç
A survey of work status of a local emergency medical services (EMS) personnel and the perception between EMS personnel and medical directors about on-line medical oversigh
¹Ú¼ÛÀÌ, À¯ÁöÈ£, ±è¼±ÈÞ, ÃÖº´È£, ±è¼ºÃá, ÀӴ뼺, ¹èº´°ü,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹Ú¼ÛÀÌ ( Park Song-Yi )
Dong-A University College of Medicine Department of Emergency Medicine
À¯ÁöÈ£ ( Ryu Ji-Ho )
Pusan National University College of Medicine Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital Department of Emergency Medicine
±è¼±ÈÞ ( Kim Sun-Hyu )
University of Ulsan College of Medicine Ulsan University Hospital Department of Emergency Medicine
ÃÖº´È£ ( Choi Byung-Ho )
University of Ulsan College of Medicine Ulsan University Hospital Department of Emergency Medicine
±è¼ºÃá ( Kim Seong-Chun )
Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital Deparment of Emergency Medicine
ÀӴ뼺 ( Lim Dae-Sung )
Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital Deparment of Emergency Medicine
¹èº´°ü ( Bae Byung-Kwan )
Pusan National University College of Medicine Pusan National University Hospital Department of Emergency Medicine
KMID : 0385920200310050483
Abstract
Objective: This study investigated the current work status of emergency medical services (EMS) personnel and the differences in perception between EMS personnel and medical directors (MD) regarding on-line medical oversight in a province.
Methods: A total of 1,781 EMS personnel and 51 medical directors were surveyed. The questionnaire consisted of the basic demographic data, work status, perception of on-line medical oversight, and the upcoming national pilot project of the expanding firefighter EMS personnel¡¯s clinical scope. The survey was conducted from May 17 to 27, 2019.
Results: The response rates for EMS personnel and MD were 73.7% and 65.3%, respectively. Of the local EMS personnel, 86.8% were male. The average age and field career was 33.5¡¾6.2 years and 50 months, respectively. The proportion of nurse and 1st-grade emergency medical technicians were 30.6% and 35.7%. The EMS personnel and MD answered ¡®on-scene basic life support¡¯ and ¡®patient¡¯s refusal of transport¡¯, respectively, as the most unnecessary medical oversight. Both responded to the main problem of current medical oversight as ¡®request for unnecessary medical oversight.¡¯ EMS personnel responded that all items in the national pilot project of expanding firefighter EMS personnel¡¯s clinical scope would be helpful, while MD reported that only ¡®use of epinephrine in anaphylactic patient¡¯ and ¡®use of pre-hospital 12 lead electrocardiogram in chest pain patient¡¯ would helpful (P<0.01).
Conclusion: There was a certain difference in perception of the most unnecessary medical oversight and the upcoming national pilot project of expanding the clinical scope of firefighter EMS personnel between EMS personnel and MD.
Å°¿öµå
Emergency medical services; Emergency medical technicians; Physician executives; Recognition
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸