Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¾ç¼º Ç×¹® ÁúȯÀÇ °æÇ×¹® ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ : ¼Ò°ß°ú À¯¿ë¼º Endoanal Ultrasound in Benign Anal Disorders : Findings and Usefulness

´ëÇѹæ»ç¼±ÀÇÇÐȸÁö 1997³â 37±Ç 3È£ p.467 ~ 472
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÇãÅÂÇà/Tae Haeng Heo ½ÅÇöÁØ/Á¶¿µ±Ç/¹Úµ¿¸³/ÀüÇýÁ¤/¹ÚÁ¤Èñ/ÃÖ¿µÃ¶/¹Ú¿õä/ÃÖÁø¿µ/Hyun Joon Shin/Young Kwon Cho/Dong Rib Park/Hae Jeong Jeon/Jeong Hee Park/Yong Chil Choi/Ung Chae Park/Jin Yong Choi

Abstract

¸ñ Àû : ¾ç¼º Ç×¹® Áúȯ Áß º¯½Ç±Ý, Ç×¹®³ó¾ç ¹× Ä¡·çµîÀÇ È¯ÀÚ¿¡¼­ °æÇ×¹® ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ ÃÔ¿µ¼ú
ÀÌ Áø´Ü¿¡ ¾î¶°ÇÑ µµ¿òÀ» ÁÖ¸ç, °¢ Áø´Ü¿¡ µû¸¥ ¿µ»ó ¼Ò°ßÀ» ¾Ë¾Æ º¸°í¶ó ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
´ë»ó ¹× ¹æ¹ý : 1995³â 10¿ùºÎÅÍ 1996³â 7¿ù±îÁö ¾ç¼º Ç×¹® ÁúȯÀ¸·Î °æÇ×¹® ÃÊÀ½Æĸ¦ ½Ã
ÇàÇÑ 25¸íÀÇ È¯ÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, Æò±Õ ¿¬·ÉÀº 37¼¼¿´°í, ³²ÀÚ 17¸í°ú ¿©ÀÚ 8¸íÀ̾ú
´Ù. ÀÌ Áß º¯½Ç±ÝÀ¸·Î Áø´ÜµÈ ȯÀÚ´Â 10¸í, Ç×¹®³ó¾ç°ú Ä¡·ç ȯÀÚ°¡ °¢°¢ 8¸í°ú 7¸íÀ̾ú´Ù.
¸ðµç ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ¼ö¼ú Àü °æÇ×¹® ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ °Ë»ç¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, º¯½Ç±ÝÀÌ Àִ ȯÀÚ´Â Á¤µµ¸¦
¾Ë±â À§ÇÏ¿© Incontinence Grading Scale(IGS)¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. À½ºÎ½Å°æ ¼Õ»ó¿©ºÎ¸¦ ¾Ë±â À§
ÇÏ¿©, À½ºÎ½Å°æ Àüµµ °Ë»ç¸¦ º´Çà ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´°í, ¼ö¼úÀü °æÇ×¹® ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ ¼Ò°ß°ú ¼ö¼ú ¼Ò°ß°úÀÇ
ÀÏÄ¡À²À» ÈÄÇâÀûÀ¸·Î °Ë»çÇÏ¿´´Ù.
°á °ú : º¯½Ç±Ý ȯÀÚ 10¸íÀÇ IGS´Â Æò±Õ 13.3Á¡(¹üÀ§, 8-20Á¡)À̾ú°í, º¯½Ç±ÝÀÇ Áõ»ó ¹ßÇö
°ú °Ë»ç±îÁöÀÇ ½Ã°£Àº 1°³¿ù¿¡¼­ 21³âÀ¸·Î Æò±Õ 8.4³â À̾ú´Ù. ÀÌÁß ½Å°æ ¼Õ»ó¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ °æ¿ì
ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ¿¡¼­ Á¤»óÀûÀÎ °ý¾à±ÙÀÇ ¼Ò°ßÀ» º¸ÀÎ °æ¿ì°¡ 7¿¹Áß 6¿¹¿´°í, °ý¾à±ÙÀÇ ÀÌ»ó¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ
°æ¿ì ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ °Ë»ç¿¡¼­ °ý¾à±ÙÀÇ °á¼Õ ȤÀº ¹ÝÈçÀ» 3¿¹ ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼­ º¸¿© º¯½Ç±ÝÀÇ ¿øÀο¡ µû¸¥
¼Ò°ßÀÇ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´´Ù(p=0.033). Ç×¹®³ó¾ç ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ³ó¾çÀÇ À§Ä¡, Å©±â ¹× ÇüŸ¦ ºñ±³ ÇÏ¿´
À» ¶§, ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ ¼Ò°ß°ú ¼ö¼ú ¼Ò°ß°£ÀÇ ÀÏÄ¡À²ÀÌ 88%¿´°í, Ä¡·çÀÇ °æ¿ì Ä¡·ç°üÀÇ À¯¹«, À§Ä¡
¹× ³»°øÀ» °Ë»çÇÑ °á°ú ¼ö¼ú ¼Ò°ß°úÀÇ ÀÏÄ¡·üÀÌ 86%¿´´Ù.
°á ·Ð : º¯½Ç±Ý ȯÀÚÀÇ Áø´Ü¿¡ ÀÖ¾î ½Å°æ Àüµµ°Ë»ç¿Í °æÇ×¹® ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ °Ë»ç¸¦ º´ÇàÇÏ¸é º¯½Ç
±ÝÀÇ ¿øÀÎ Áø´Ü¿¡ À¯¿ëÇϸç, °ý¾à±Ù ¼Õ»óÀÌ ÀÖÀ»¶§ ¼Õ»óÀÇ À§Ä¡¿Í Á¤µµ±îÁö ÆľÇÇÒ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.
Ç×¹®³ó¾ç°ú Ä¡·çÀÇ °æ¿ì ÁúȯÀÇ Á¤µµ¸¦ ÆľÇÇÏ¿© ¿Ü°úÀû Ä¡·á ¹æħÀÇ ¼³Á¤¿¡ µµ¿òÀ» ÁÖ¸ç
°´°üÀû ÁöħÀ» Á¦°øÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
Purpose : To evaluate the usefulness of endoanal ultrasonography and to determine the
imaging features of patients with fecal incontinence, anal abscess of anal fistula.
Materials and Methods : Twenty five patiednts underwent endoanal ultrasonography
between October 1995 and July 1996. Ten of these were fecal incontinence cases, eight
had and anal abscess, and seven, and anal fistula. The incontinence grading scale (IGS)
was used for clinical grading of fecal incontinence and pudendal nerve terminal motor
latency (PNTML) for pudendal nerve injury. Endoanal ultrasonographic features and
operative findings were retrospectively reviesed.
Results : Endoanal ultrasonography revealed defective sphincteric muscles in all three
patients with myogenic fecal incontinence, but in six of seven cases with neurogenic
fecal incontinence, these muscles were not defective, Myogenic and neurogenic
incontience showed different findings (p=0.033). In comparison with surgical findings,
endoanal ultrasonography was 88% accurate in anal sbscess cases and 86% accurate in
those of anal fistula.
Conclusion : Endoanal ultrasonography in conjunction with PNTML was very useful for
the detection of the site and severith of sphincteric muscle defect and diagnosis of the
etiology of fecal incontinence. Through analysis of the site and type of lesion, the
procedure can also serve as a guide to the surgical treatment of patients with anal
abscess or fistula.

Å°¿öµå

Anus; US; Ultrasound(US); technology;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KoreaMed
KAMS