Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

À¯Çü¿¡ µû¸¥ ±ÙÀüµµ À¯¹ß ½Å°æ±Ù Àü±âÀÚ±ØÄ¡·á°¡ ³úÁ¹Áß È¯ÀÚÀÇ »óÁö±â´É°ú ÀÏ»ó»ýÈ°È°µ¿¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â È¿°ú ºñ±³: ÀüÇâÀû, ¹«ÀÛÀ§ ´ëÁ¶ ¿¬±¸ A Comparison of the Effect According to Type of Electromyography-triggered Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on the Upper Limb Function and Activities of Daily Living in Stroke Patients : A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial

´ëÇÑÀÛ¾÷Ä¡·áÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 22±Ç 2È£ p.17 ~ 33
¹ÚÁö¼ö, ÃÖÁ¾¹è,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹ÚÁö¼ö ( Park Ji-Su ) 
ÀÎÁ¦´ëÇб³ ºÎ»ê¹éº´¿ø ÀçÈ°ÀÇÇаú ÀÛ¾÷Ä¡·á½Ç

ÃÖÁ¾¹è ( Choi Jong-Bae ) 
°æÈñ´ëÇб³º´¿ø ÀçÈ°ÀÇÇаú ÀÛ¾÷Ä¡·á½Ç

Abstract

¸ñÀû : º» ¿¬±¸´Â µÎ °¡Áö À¯ÇüÀÇ ±ÙÀüµµ À¯¹ß ½Å°æ±Ù Àü±âÀÚ±ØÄ¡·á¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ³úÁ¹Áß È¯ÀÚÀÇ ¸¶ºñÃø »óÁö ±â ´É°ú ÀÏ»ó»ýÈ°È°µ¿¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ¾Ë¾Æº¸°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

¿¬±¸¹æ¹ý : ³úÁ¹Áß ¹ßº´ 6°³¿ù À̳»ÀÇ ¾Æ±Þ¼º±â ³úÁ¹Áß È¯ÀÚ 20¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¹«ÀÛÀ§ ´ëÁ¶ ½ÇÇèÀ» ÁøÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. µÎ Áý´ÜÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ±ÙÀüµµ À¯¹ß Àü±âÀÚ±ØÄ¡·á¿Í »ó»ó ÈÆ·Ã °áÇÕµÈ ±ÙÀüµµ À¯¹ß Àü±âÀÚ±ØÄ¡·á¸¦ÇÏ·ç 20ºÐ°£, ÁÖ 5ȸ, 4ÁÖ°£ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. »óÁö±â´ÉÆò°¡·Î ¿ïÇÁ¿îµ¿±â´ÉÆò°¡(Wolf Motor Function Test;WMFT), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)¸¦ »ç¿ë ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ÀÏ»ó»ýÈ°È°µ¿ Æò°¡·Î ¼öÁ¤¹Ùµ¨Áö¼ö(Modified Barthel Index; MBI)¸¦ »ç ¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú : 1) 4ÁÖ°£ÀÇ ÁßÀç ÈÄ, »ó»ó ÈÆ·Ã °áÇÕµÈ ±ÙÀüµµ À¯¹ß Àü±âÀÚ±ØÄ¡·á¸¦ ¹ÞÀº Áý´Ü¿¡¼­ FMA¿Í WMFTÀÇ Åë °èÇÐÀû À¯ÀÇÇÑ Çâ»óÀ» º¸¿´´Ù(p<.01). MBI Æò°¡ ¿ª½Ã Åë°èÇÐÀû À¯ÀÇÇÑ Çâ»óÀ» º¸¿´À¸¸ç ƯÈ÷ °³ÀÎÈ°µ¿ Ç׸ñ¿¡ ¼­ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Çâ»óÀ» º¸¿´´Ù(p<.05). 2) ±ÙÀüµµ À¯¹ß ½Å°æ±Ù Àü±âÀÚ±ØÄ¡·á¸¦ ¹ÞÀº Áý´ÜÀÇ °æ¿ìFMAÀÇ ¼Õ¸ñ ¿òÁ÷ ÀÓ Ç׸ñ°ú WMFT¿¡¼­ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Çâ»óÀ» º¸¿´´Ù(p<.05). ¶ÇÇÑ MBI Àüü Á¡¼ö¿¡¼­ Åë°èÇÐÀû À¯ÀÇÇÑ Çâ»óÀº ¾ø¾úÁö ¸¸ °³ÀÎÈ°µ¿ Ç׸ñ¿¡¼­¸¸ Åë°èÇÐÀû À¯ÀÇÇÑ Çâ»óÀ» º¸¿´´Ù(p<.05).

°á·Ð : º» ¿¬±¸¸¦ ÅëÇØ µÎ À¯ÇüÀÇ ±ÙÀüµµ À¯¹ß ½Å°æ±Ù Àü±âÀÚ±ØÄ¡·á´Â ±Þ¼º±â ³úÁ¹Áß È¯ÀÚÀÇ »óÁö ¿îµ¿ ȸº¹°ú ÀÏ»ó»ýÈ°È°µ¿¿¡ È¿°úÀûÀÎ Ä¡·á¶ó´Â °ÍÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.

Objective : This study aimed at investigating the effect of two types of electromyography-triggered neuromuscularelectrical stimulation on the upper limb function of the affected side and activities of daily living in stroke patients.

Methods : A randomized controlled study was conducted for 20 patients within 6 months of occurrence of a subacutestroke. The patients were divided into two groups as follows: those treated with electromyography-triggeredneuromuscular electrical stimulation (EMG-NMES), and those treated with mental imagery training combined withEMG-NMES (MIT EMG-NMES), for 30 minutes a day, 5 days a week, for 4 weeks. For the assessment of upperlimb function, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) and Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) were used, and for theassessment of daily living activities, the Modified Barthel Index (MBI) was used.

Results : After four weeks of intervention, the MIT EMG-NMES-treated group showed statistically significantimprovement in the FMA and WMFT (p<.01), and improvement in the MBI, particularly in each of the self-carescores, with a statistical significance (p<.05). The EMG-NMES-treated group showed significant improvement inwrist movement on the FMA and in the upper limb function in the WMFT (p<.05). There was no statisticallysignificant improvement in the total MBI, except in the self-care score (p<.05).

Conclusion : This study suggests that both the MIT EMG-NMES and EMG-NMES are beneficial in improving theupper limb function and activities of daily living in patients after an acute stroke.

Å°¿öµå

±ÙÀüµµ À¯¹ß Àü±âÀÚ±Ø; ³úÁ¹Áß; »ó»óÈÆ·Ã; »óÁö±â´É
Electromyogram-triggered electrical stimulation;Mental imagery training;Stroke;Upper extremity function

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI