Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

À§¿¡ ¹ß»ýÇÑ À§Àå°ü °£ÁúÁ¾¾ç: ÀÓ»óº´¸®Àû ¾ç»ó ¹× ¸é¿ªÁ¶Á÷È­ÇÐÀû ¹ßÇö Á¶»ç Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor in Stomach: A Clinicopathologic and Immunohistochemical Study

´ëÇѼÒÈ­±âÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 32±Ç 3È£ p.320 ~ 331
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÈñö/Hee Cheol Kim ±è¿Ï¼ö/À°Á¤È¯/¿À¼ºÅÂ/±èº´½Ä/ÀÌÇå°æ/±èÁøõ/¹Ú°ÇÃá/Wan Soo Kim/Jeong Hwan Yook/Sung Tae Oh/Bae Sik Kim/Hun Kyung Lee/Jin Cheon Kim/Kun Choon Park

Abstract

¿ä¾à
¸ñÀû : À§Àå°ü °£ÁúÁ¾¾çÀº ÁÖ·Î ÆòÈ°±Ù¿¡¼­ ±â¿øÇÏ´Â Á¾¾çÀ¸·Î Áø´ÜµÇ¾î ¿ÔÀ¸³ª, ÃÖ±Ù µé
¾î¼­´Â ¹ÌºÐÈ­¼¼Æ÷¸¦ Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ º¹ÇÕÀûÀÎ ºÐÈ­¸¦ °¡Áø Á¾¾ç±ºÀ¸·Î ¿©°ÜÁö°í ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ À§Àå
°ü °£ÁúÁ¾¾çÀº ºÐÈ­ÀÇ ¸ðÈ£ÇÔ°ú ÀÓ»ó°æ°ú ¿¹ÃøÀÇ ¾î·Á¿òÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇÏ¿© Ä¡·á¿¡ È¥¶õÀ» ¾ß±â½Ã
ÄÑ ¿Ô´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â À§¿¡¼­ ¹ß»ýÇÑ 29¿¹ÀÇ À§Àå°ü °£ÁúÁ¾¾çÀÇ ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇÏ¿© À̵é Á¾¾çÀÇ
ºÐ·ù ¹× ¿¹ÈÄÀÎÀÚ, Ä¡·á¹ýÀÇ ¿øÄ¢À» °áÁ¤Çϴµ¥ µµ¿òÀ» ÁÖ°íÀÚ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁ³´Ù.
´ë»ó ¹× ¹æ¹ý : ¼­¿ïÁß¾Óº´¿ø ÀϹݿܰú¿¡¼­ 8³â µ¿¾È °æÇèÇÏ¿´´ø À§¿¡ ¹ß»ýÇÑ À§Àå°ü °£
ÁúÁ¾¾ç 29¿¹¸¦ ÈÄÇâÀûÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÓ»óÀû ¾ç»ó ¹× º´¸®Á¶Á÷ÇÐÀû Ư¡À» Á¶»çÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç,
¸é¿ªÇÐÀû Ç¥ÇöÇüÀÇ ´Ù¾ç¼ºÀ» È®ÀÎÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© SMA¿Í 5-100 ´Ü¹éÁúÀÇ Ç×ü¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ¸é
¿ªÁ¶Á÷È­ÇÐÀû °Ë»ç¸¦ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
°á°ú : 29¿¹ÀÇ ³²³àºñ´Â 20:9·Î, ÁÖ·Î 50´ë¿Í 60´ë¿¡ È£¹ßÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼ö¼úÀº 27¿¹¿¡¼­ ½ÃÇàÇÏ
¿´À¸¸ç ÀÌ Áß26¿¹¿¡¼­ ¿ø¹ßº´¼ÒÀÇ ÀýÁ¦°¡ ½ÃÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¸é¿ªÁ¶Á÷È­ÇÐ °Ë»ç»ó SMA¿¡ ¾ç¼ºÀ»
º¸ÀÌ´Â ¿¹°¡ 38%, 5-100¿¡ ¾ç¼ºÀ» º¸ÀÌ´Â ¿¹°¡ 8%¿´°í, ÀÌ Áß 2¿¹´Â µÎ Ç×ü¿¡ ¸ðµÎ ¾ç¼º
¹ÝÀÀÀ» ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù. 1±º°ú 2±ºÀ» ºñ±³ÇßÀ» ¶§ À¯»çºÐ¿­¼ö¿¡ µû¸¥ ºÐÆ÷¿¡ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ¼¼
Æ÷À¯Çü¿¡ µû¸¥ ºÐÆ÷µµ »óÀÌÇÑ °æÇâÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. Àüü 5³â »ýÁ¸À²Àº 50%¿´À¸¸ç, Á¾¾çÀÇ Å©±â,
¸²ÇÁÀýÀüÀÌ ¿©ºÎ, ¿ø°ÝÀüÀÌ ¿©ºÎ¿¡ µû¶ó »ýÁ¸À²ÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. º´¸®Á¶Á÷ÇÐÀû ÀÎÀÚ Áß
ÇÙÀÇ ÀÌÇü¼º Á¤µµ°¡ »ýÁ¸À²ÀÇ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. ±× ¿Ü ¸é¿ªÁ¶Á÷ÇÐÀû ºÐ·ù µîÀº ¿¹ÈÄÀÎÀڷμ­
ÀÇ °¡Ä¡°¡ ¾ø´Ù°í ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. À§ÀÇ ±¹¼ÒÀýÁ¦¼úÀº °í½ÄÀûÀÎ À§ÀýÁ¦¼ú°ú ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´À» ¶§ »ýÁ¸À²
ÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù.
°á·Ð : ¸é¿ªÀû Ç¥ÇöÇüÀÇ ´Ù¾ç¼ºÀº À§Àå°ü °£ÁúÁ¾¾çÀÌ ´Ù¸¥ ±â¿ø¸¦ °¡Áø ´Ù¾çÇÑ Á¾¾çÀÇ º¹
ÇÕÀûÀÎ ¸ðÀÓÀ̶ó´Â °¡´É¼ºÀ» Á¦½ÃÇØ ÁÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç, Á¾¾çÀÇ Å©±â, À§ÁÖº¯ ¸²ÇÁÀý ¹× ¿ø°ÝÀüÀÌ À¯
¹«, ÇÙÀÇ ÀÌÇü¼º Á¤µµ°¡ ¿¹ÈÄÀÎÀÚ·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. Ä¡·á¹ýÀ¸·Î´Â À°¾ÈÀû º´¼Ò¸¦ ±ÙÄ¡ÀûÀ¸·Î ÀýÁ¦
ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ¹Ù¶÷Á÷ÇÒ °ÍÀ̸ç, ÀýÁ¦ÀÇ ¹üÀ§´Â Á¾¾çÀÇ À§Ä¡¿Í Å©±â¸¦ °í·ÁÇÏ¿© Àû´çÇÑ ÀýÁ¦¿¬
À» È®º¸ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù¸é ±¹¼ÒÀýÁ¦°¡ ¹Ù¶÷Á÷ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÈ´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
Background/Aims : The origin and clinical behavior of gastrointestinal stromal tumors
(GIST) have been a source of recent speculation and controversy. This study was
performed to determine the classification and prognostic factors of GIST.
Methods : The clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical features for the presence of
smooth muscle actin (SMA) and S-100 protein (S-100) in the 29 cases with GIST were
reviewed.
Results : The ratio of male to female among 29 cases was 20:9 and the median age
was 59 (range, 38-73). The operations were performed in the 27 cases (2 cases, wedge
resection; 6 cases, partial gastrectomy; 12 cases, total gastrectomy; and 1 case, biopsy).
In immunohistochemical study using the antibodies of SMA and S-100, 9 cases showed
the immunoreactivity to antibody of SMA. Two cases showed immunoreactivity to
antibodies of both SMA and S-100, but 13 cases did not show the immunoreactivity to
either antibodies. The positively stained group to the antibody of SMA had the tendency
of consisting of spindle shaped cells and low mitosis numbers. The overall 5 year
survival rate was 50%. Tumor size, presence of lymph node metastasis, distant
metastasis, and degree of nuclear atpypism affected on the survival rate.
Conclusions : Tumor size (>10 cm vs 10 cm), presence of lymph node metastasis,
distant metastasis and nuclear atypism could be prognostic factors. Local excision with
adequate surgical margins seems to show similar outcome compared with conventional
gastric resection. The results of immunohistochemical study showed the possibility of
diverse cellular origin of GIST in the stomach.

Å°¿öµå

À§Àå°ü °£ÁúÁ¾¾ç; À§; ¸é¿ªÁ¶Á÷È­ÇÐÀû °Ë»ç; ¿¹ÈÄÀÎÀÚ; Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (G157); Stomach; Immunohistochemistry; Prognosis;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

MEDLINE
KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS