Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¹Ì¼÷¾Æ¿¡¼­ À§½Äµµ ¿ª·ù¿Í ¹«È£Èí°£ÀÇ °ü°è Relation between Gastroesophageal Reflux and Apnea in Preterm Infants

´ëÇѼÒÈ­±âÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 32±Ç 6È£ p.733 ~ 739
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
°íÀ缺/Jae Sung Ko ±èÀ翵/¹Ú°æ¶õ/±èº´ÀÏ/ÃÖÁßȯ/¼­Á¤±â/Jae Young Kim/Kyung Ran Park/Byeong Il Kim/Jung-Hwan Choi/Jeong Kee Seo

Abstract

¿ä¾à
¸ñÀû : ¹Ì¼÷¾Æ¿¡¼­ À§½Äµµ ¿ª·ù´Â ¹«È£Èí, ¼­¸Æ°ú ¿¬°üÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù°í ¾Ë·ÁÁ® ÀÖ´Ù. ¹Ì¼÷¾Æ¿¡¼­
¼öÀ¯, ÈäºÎ¹°¸®¿ä¹ý, ±â°èÀû ȯ±â°¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ°í ¹«È£ÈíÀÌ Àִ ȯ¾Æ¿¡¼­ À§½Äµµ
¿ª·ù¿Í ¹«È£Èí°£ÀÇ °ü°è¸¦ ¾Ë¾Æº¸°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
´ë»ó ¹× ¹æ¹ý : 1997³â 5¿ùºÎÅÍ 1998³â 5¿ù±îÁö ¼­¿ï´ëº´¿ø ½Å»ý¾Æ ÁßȯÀڽǿ¡ ÀÔ¿øÇÑ Àç
Å¿¬·É 37ÁÖ ¹Ì¸¸ÀÇ ¹Ì¼÷¾Æ 22¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î monocrystalline antimony Àü±ØÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© 24
½Ã°£ ½Äµµ pH °Ë»ç¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. Æò±Õ ÀçÅ¿¬·ÉÀº 31ÁÖ, Æò±Õ ¼öÅ¿¬·ÉÀº 34ÁÖ, Æò±Õ Ãâ»ý
üÁßÀº 1,835 gÀ̾ú´Ù. ¼öÀ¯, ±¸°­, ±âµµ³» ÈíÀÔ°ú ÈäºÎ ¹°¸®¿ä¹ýÇÒ ¶§¸¦ ±â·ÏÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±â°èÀû
ȯ±â¸¦ ¹Þ¾Ò´ø ȯ¾Æ 6¸íÀº Á¤»ó È£Èí½Ã¿¡ 24½Ã°£ ½Äµµ pH °Ë»ç¸¦ ¹Ýº¹ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¹«È£Èí
ÀÌ ¾ø´Â ȯ¾Æ±º, ¹«È£ÈíÀÌ aminophylline Ä¡·á ÈÄ¿¡ ÇÏ·ç 3ȸ ¹Ì¸¸À¸·Î È£ÀüµÇ´Â xanthine
¹ÝÀÀ±º, aminophylline Ä¡·á¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸ÇÏ°í ¹«È£ÈíÀÌ Áö¼ÓµÇ´Â xanthine ºÒÀÀ±ºÀ¸·Î ³ª´©¾î
À§½Äµµ ¿ª·ùÀÇ ºóµµ¸¦ ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
°á°ú : ¿ª·ù Áö¼öÀÇ Æò±ÕÀº 7.2%, ¿ª·ù Ƚ¼öÀÇ Æò±ÕÀº 69ȸ, 5ºÐ ÀÌ»ó Áö¼ÓµÇ´Â ¿ª·ù Ƚ¼ö
ÀÇ Æò±ÕÀº 3.8ȸ, ÃÖÀå ¿ª·ù ½Ã°£ÀÇ Æò±ÕÀº 17.8ºÐÀ̾ú´Ù. ¼öÀ¯ ÈÄ 2½Ã°£³»ÀÇ Æò±Õ ¿ª·ù Áö¼ö
´Â 5.4%, ±Ý½Ä½ÃÀÇ Æò±Õ ¿ª·ù Áö¼ö´Â 9.6%À̾úÀ¸³ª Åë°èÀûÀÎ Â÷ÀÌ´Â ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ±¸°­³», ±â°ü
³» ÈíÀÔ°ú ÈäºÎ ¹°¸®¿ä¹ý½ÃÀÇ ¿ª·ù Áö¼ö´Â 18.8%·Î ÀǹÌÀÖ°Ô Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±â°èÀû ȯ±â½ÃÀÇ
¿ª·ù Áö¼ö´Â 1.0%·Î Á¤»ó È£Èí½ÃÀÇ ¿ª·ù Áö¼öÀÎ 9.0%º¸´Ù ÀǹÌÀÖ°Ô ÀûÀº °ªÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. ¹«
È£ÈíÀÌ ¾ø´Â ȯ¾Æ±º, xanthine ¹ÝÀÀ±º, xanthine ºÒÀÀ±ºÀÇ ¿ª·ù Áö¼ö¿Í 5ºÐ ÀÌ»ó Áö¼ÓµÇ´Â
¿ª·ù Ƚ¼ö´Â °¢°¢ 3.9%, 5.6%, 12.6%¿Í 1.8ȸ, 2.7ȸ, 7.1ȸ·Î xanthine ºÒÀÀ±º¿¡¼­ À§½Äµµ
·ùÀÇ ºóµµ°¡ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
°á·Ð : ¹Ì¼÷¾Æ¿¡¼­ xanthineÄ¡·á¿¡ ¹ÝÀÀÀÌ ¾ø´Â ¹«È£Èí ȯ¾Æ¿¡¼­ ±× ¿øÀÎÀ¸·Î À§½Äµµ ¿ª·ù
¸¦ °¨º°ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ Áß¿äÇÏ´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
Background/Aims : In the preterm infants, gastroesophageal reflux (GER) has been
associated with apnea. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of feeding,
chest physiotherapy, and mechanical ventilation on GER, and to evaluate the association
between GER and apnea in preform infants.
Methods : The 24 hour esophageal pH was recorded using a monocrystalline antimony
electrode for 22 preform infants. The mean gestational age and postconceptional age
were 31 and 34 weeks, respectively. The mean birth weight was 1,835 g. Patients were
classified into three groups, eight infants without apnea; seven infants with xanthine
sensitive apnea; seven infants with xanthine resistant apnea who had frequent attacks of
apnea that were unaffected by the adminstration of aminophylline.
Results : The mean reflux index was 7.2% and the longest episode was 17.8 minutes.
Physiotherapy was associated with a significant increase in the amount of reflux. The
GER index during mechanical ventilation (1.0%) was significantly less than that during
normal breathing (9.0%). The mean reflux index in no apnea group, xanthine sensitive
apnea group, and xanthine resistant apnea group was 3.9%, 5.6%, and 12.6%,
respectively.
Conclusions : GER should be considered as a cause of xanthine resistant apnea in
preform infants.

Å°¿öµå

À§½Äµµ ¿ª·ù; ¹«È£Èí; ¹Ì¼÷¾Æ; Xanthine; Gastroesophageal reflux; Apnea; Preterm; Xanthine;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

MEDLINE
KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS