Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Ç¥ÁØ »ïÁ¦ ¿ä¹ý¿¡ ½ÇÆÐÇÑ Ç︮ÄÚ¹ÚÅÍ ÆÄÀϷθ® °¨¿° ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ÀÇ 7ÀÏ Bismuth Æ÷ÇÔ »çÁ¦ ¿ä¹ý°ú 14ÀÏ Moxifloxacin Æ÷ÇÔ »ïÁ¦ ¿ä¹ýÀÇ Á¦±ÕÀ² ºñ±³ ¿¬±¸ Effect of 7-day Bismuth Quadruple Therapy versus 14-day Moxifloxacin Triple Therapy for Second-line Helicobacter pylori Eradication Therapy

´ëÇѼÒÈ­±âÇÐȸÁö 2019³â 73±Ç 1È£ p.26 ~ 34
±è¼ºÀº, ³ëÁöÈÆ, ¹Ú¹«ÀÎ, ¹Ú¼±ÀÚ, ¹®¿ø, ±èÀçÇö, Á¤°æ¿ø, ÇãÀçÁØ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è¼ºÀº ( Kim Sung-Eun ) 
°í½Å´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç

³ëÁöÈÆ ( Roh Ji-Hun ) 
µ¿ÀÇÀÇ·á¿ø ³»°ú
¹Ú¹«ÀΠ( Park Moo-In ) 
°í½Å´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç
¹Ú¼±ÀÚ ( Park Seon-Ja ) 
°í½Å´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç
¹®¿ø ( Moon Won ) 
°í½Å´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç
±èÀçÇö ( Kim Jae-Hyun ) 
°í½Å´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç
Á¤°æ¿ø ( Jung Kyoung-Won ) 
°í½Å´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç
ÇãÀçÁØ ( Heo Jae-Joon ) 
°í½Å´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract


Background/Aims: Both bismuth-containing quadruple therapy and moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy have been suggested as second-line eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 14-day moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy (14-EAM) in second-line H. pylori eradication in comparison to 7-day bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (7-RBMT).

Methods: From January 2011 to December 2015, a total of 569 patients who failed to respond to first-line triple therapy and who subsequently received second-line 7-RBMT or 14-EAM were retrospectively enrolled. The eradication rates were identified using per-protocol (PP) analysis. H. pylori eradication was confirmed by a 13C-urea breath test (UBiT-IR300¢ç; Otsuka Electronics, Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) or a rapid urease test (CLOtest¢ç; Delta West, Bentley, Australia) at least 4 weeks after completion of eradication therapy.

Results: A total of 487 and 82 patients received 7-RBMT and 14-EAM, respectively. PP eradication rates were 93.6% (366/391; 95% CI, 91.0-95.9%) with 7-RBMT and 73.8% (48/65; 95% CI, 63.1-84.6%) with14-EAM (p<0.001). Therefore, the eradication rates with 7-RBMT were significantly higher than with 14-EAM according to the PP analysis. The adverse event rate was 17.1% (67/391) with 7-RBMT and 7.7% (5/65) with 14-EAM (p=0.065). In terms of risk factors, multivariate analysis revealed that 14-EAM (OR, 5.47; 95% CI, 2.74-10.93) was related to H. pylori eradication failure.

Conclusions: 7-RBMT may be an effective second-line therapy in patients who failed to respond to first-line triple therapy in Korea, where there is a high prevalence of H. pylori infection.

Å°¿öµå

Helicobacter pylori; Disease eradication; Bismuth tripotassium dicitrate; Moxifloxacin

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

MEDLINE
KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS