Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Success and Complication Rates After Sacral Neuromodulation for Fecal Incontinence and Constipation: A Single-center Follow-up Study

´ëÇѼÒÈ­°ü¿îµ¿ÇÐȸÁö 2019³â 25±Ç 1È£ p.159 ~ 170
Widmann Bernhard, Galata Christian, Warschkow Rene, Beutner Ulrich, Ogredici Onder, Hetzer Franc H, Schmied Bruno M, Post Stefan, Marti Lukas,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Widmann Bernhard ) 
Kantonsspital St. Gallen Department of General, Visceral, Endocrine and Transplantation Surgery

 ( Galata Christian ) 
University of Heidelberg University Medical Center Mannheim Department of Surgery
 ( Warschkow Rene ) 
Kantonsspital St. Gallen Department of General, Visceral, Endocrine and Transplantation Surgery
 ( Beutner Ulrich ) 
Kantonsspital St. Gallen Department of General, Visceral, Endocrine and Transplantation Surgery
 ( Ogredici Onder ) 
Kantonsspital St. Gallen Department of General, Visceral, Endocrine and Transplantation Surgery
 ( Hetzer Franc H ) 
Spital Linth Department of Surgery
 ( Schmied Bruno M ) 
Kantonsspital St. Gallen Department of General, Visceral, Endocrine and Transplantation Surgery
 ( Post Stefan ) 
University of Heidelberg University Medical Center Mannheim Department of Surgery
 ( Marti Lukas ) 
Kantonsspital St. Gallen Department of General, Visceral, Endocrine and Transplantation Surgery

Abstract


Background/Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the sustainability of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) success in patients with fecal incontinence (FI) and/or constipation.

Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of a prospective database of patients who received SNM therapy for FI and/or constipation between 2006 and 2015. Success rates, complications and reintervention rates were assessed after up to 10 years of follow-up.

Results: Electrodes for test stimulation were implanted in 101 patients, of whom 79 (78.2%) received permanent stimulation. The mean follow-up was 4.4 ¡¾ 3.0 years. At the end of follow-up, 57 patients (72.2%) were still receiving SNM. The 5-year success rate for FI and isolated constipation was 88.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80.1?97.0%) and 31.2% (95% CI, 10.2?95.5%), respectively (P < 0.001). In patients with FI, involuntary evacuations per week decreased > 50% in 76.1% of patients (95% CI, 67.6?86.2%) after 5 years. A lead position at S3 was associated with an improved outcome (P = 0.04). Battery exchange was necessary in 23 patients (29.1%), with a median battery life of 6.2 years. Reinterventions due to complications were necessary in 24 patients (30.4%). For these patients, the 5-year success rate was 89.0% (95% CI, 75.3?100.0%) compared to 78.4% (95% CI, 67.2?91.4%) for patients without reintervention.

Conclusions: SNM offers an effective sustainable treatment for FI. For constipation, lasting success of SNM is limited and is thus not recommended. Reinterventions are necessary but do not impede treatment success.

Å°¿öµå

Constipation; Electric stimulation; Fecal incontinence; Sacral nerve stimulation; Sacral neuromodulation

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS