Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

½Äµµ µ¿À§ ¿ø¼Ò °Ë»ç¿Í 24½Ã°£ ½Äµµ pH °Ë»ç¿ÍÀÇ ºñ±³ ¿¬±¸ Comparison between 24 hr pH Monitoring and Esophageal Scintigrapy in Children Presenting with Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms

´ëÇѼҾƼÒÈ­±â¿µ¾çÇÐȸÁö 2004³â 7±Ç 2È£ p.163 ~ 169
À§È£¼º, ÃÖÀ±¿µ, ±è¿ëÁÖ, ¼³ÀÎÁØ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À§È£¼º ( Wi Ho-Sung ) 
ÇѾç´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾Æ°úÇб³½Ç

ÃÖÀ±¿µ ( Choi Yun-Young ) 
ÇѾç´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ÇÙÀÇÇб³½Ç
±è¿ëÁÖ ( Kim Yong-Joo ) 
ÇѾç´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾Æ°úÇб³½Ç
¼³ÀÎÁØ ( Seol In-Joon ) 
ÇѾç´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾Æ°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

¸ñ Àû: À§½Äµµ ¿ª·ù´Â ¼Ò¾Æ¿¡ À־ ÈçÇÑ ÁúȯÀ¸·Î À̸¦ Áø´ÜÇϱâ À§Çؼ­´Â ¿©·¯ ¹æ¹ýµéÀÌ »ç¿ëµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. 24½Ã°£ ½Äµµ pH °Ë»ç´Â À½½Ä¹°¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ±× °á°ú°¡ ´Þ¶óÁú ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç ¾ËÄ®¸®¼º ¿ª·ù¸¦ Áø´ÜÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø´Ù. ÀÌ ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº À§½Äµµ ¿ª·ù¸¦ °¡Áø ȯ¾Æ¿¡¼­ ½Äµµ µ¿À§ ¿ø¼Ò °Ë»ç°¡ 24½Ã°£ pH °Ë»ç¸¦ ´ëü ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â Áö¸¦ ¾Ë¾Æº¸±â À§ÇÔÀÌ´Ù.

¹æ ¹ý: 2002³â 3¿ùºÎÅÍ 2003³â 6¿ù±îÁö ¹Ýº¹¼º ±¸Åä, ±âħ, ÈäÅë, º¸Ã¨ µî À§½Äµµ ¿ª·ù°¡ ÀǽɵǾî ÇѾç´ë º´¿ø ¼Ò¾Æ°ú¿¡ ÀÔ¿øÇÑ È¯¾Æ 23¸í(³²£º¿©=12£º11, Æò±Õ¿¬·É 27°³¿ù)À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î 24½Ã°£ pH °Ë»ç¿Í ½Äµµ µ¿À§ ¿ø¼Ò °Ë»ç¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á °ú: 24½Ã°£ ½Äµµ pH °Ë»ç °á°ú 23¸íÀÇ È¯¾Æ Áß6¸í(26.1%)¿¡¼­ À¯ÀÇÇÑ À§½Äµµ ¿ª·ù°¡ °üÂûµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç 2¸íÀÇ È¯¾Æ´Â º¸Ã¤¼­ °á°ú¸¦ ¾òÀ» ¼ö ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ½Äµµ µ¿À§ ¿ø¼Ò °Ë»ç °á°ú 23¸í Áß 9¸í(39.2%)ÀÇ È¯¾Æ¿¡¼­ À§½Äµµ ¿ª·ù°¡ ¿µ»óÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î °üÂûµÇ¾ú´Ù. 24
½Ã°£ ½Äµµ pH °Ë»ç¿Í ½Äµµ µ¿À§ °Ë»ç ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼­ ¾ç¼ºÀ¸·Î ³ª¿Â ȯ¾Æ´Â 3¸í(14.3%), ¸ðµÎ À½¼ºÀ¸·Î ³ª¿Â ȯ¾Æ´Â 9¸í(42.9%)À̾úÀ¸¸ç 24½Ã°£ ½Äµµ pH °Ë»ç¸¸ ¾ç¼ºÀ¸·Î ³ª¿Â ȯ¾Æ´Â 3¸í(14.3%), ½Äµµ µ¿À§ ¿ø¼Ò °Ë»ç¿¡¼­¸¸ ¾ç¼ºÀ¸·Î ³ª¿Â ȯ¾Æ´Â 6¸í(28.6%)À̾ú
´Ù. µÎ °Ë»çÀÇ °á°ú¸¦ Fisher¡¯s exact test¿Í(p=0.523) KendallÀÇ Å¸¿ì(±Ù»ç À¯ÀÇ È®·ü=0.678)·Î ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´°í µÎ °Ë»ç °£ÀÇ °á°úÀÇ ¿¬°ü¼ºÀº °üÂûµÇÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù.

°á ·Ð: 24½Ã°£ ½Äµµ pH°Ë»ç¿Í ½Äµµ µ¿À§ ¿ø¼Ò °Ë»ç´Â ¿¬°ü¼ºÀÌ ¾ø°í ¼­·Î ´Ù¸¥ ¹æ¹ýÀÇ °Ë»çÀ̹ǷΠÀÌ µÎ °Ë»ç´Â »óÈ£ º¸¿ÏÀûÀ¸·Î ½ÃÇàÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ À§½Äµµ ¿ª·ù ȯÀÚ¸¦ Áø´ÜÇÒ ¶§ À¯¿ëÇÏ´Ù.

Purpose: Many diagnostic modalities have been used for diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Feeding materials during esophageal pH monitoring may interfere the result of examination and esophageal pH monitoring can not diagnose GER in case of alkaline reflux. The purpose of our study is to evaluate whether scintigraphy can substitiute 24 hr pH monitoring in children with GERD.

Methods:From March 2002 to June 2003, 23 patients (12 boys and 11 girls, mean age 27 months) who have been admitted to Hanyang University Hospital presented with GER symptoms (recurrent vomiting, cough, chest pain, irritability) were included in the study. Scintigraphy and 24 hr pH monitoring were performed in all patients.

Results:Six out of the 23 patients (26.1%) had evidence of GER on 24 hr pH monitoring, whereas nine of 23 patients (39.2%) exhibited GER by scintigraphy. Two out of the 23 patients could not be tested because of irritability. Three (14.3%) patients had evidence of GER on both 24 hr pH monitoring and scintigraphy, three (14.3%) patients on only 24 hr pH monitoring, six (28.6%) patients on only scintigraphy, and nine (42.9%) patients had no evidence of GER on both methods. No correlation was observed between 24 hr pH monitoring and scintigraphic results by Fisher¡¯s exact test (p=0.523) or Kendal¡¯s tau (t=0.678).

Conclusion:The results of this study demonstrated that there was no correlation between 24 hr pH monitoring and scintigraphy. Therefore these modalities could be used as complementary tests to diagnose GERD.

Å°¿öµå

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER);Scintigraphy;Esophageal pH monitoring;Children

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS