Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¼±Çü°¡¼Ó±âÇü ¹æ»ç¼±¼ö¼ú½Ã ÀÎÇü ÆÒÅè¿¡¼­ ¼öÁ¤Ã¼ ¹× °©»ó¼± ¼±·® Radiation Dose of Lens and Thyroid in Linac-based Radiosurgery in Humanoid Phantom

´ëÇѹæ»ç¼±Á¾¾çÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 16±Ç 4È£ p.517 ~ 529
±è´ë¿ë, ±èÀÏÇÑ, ±èÀÏÇÑ, ±è´ë¿ë,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è´ë¿ë (  ) 
¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡·á¹æ»ç¼±°úÇб³½Ç

±èÀÏÇÑ (  ) 
¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡·á¹æ»ç¼±°úÇб³½Ç
±èÀÏÇÑ (  ) 
¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ÀÇÇבּ¸¿ø ¹æ»ç¼±ÀÇÇבּ¸¼Ò
±è´ë¿ë (  ) 
¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »ï¼º¼­¿ïº´¿ø

Abstract

¸ñ Àû : Á¤À§¹æ»ç¼±¼ö¼úÀº ³úµ¿Á¤¸Æ±âÇü ¹× û½Å°æÃÊÁ¾, ³ú¼ö¸·Á¾¾ç, ³úÇϼöüÁ¾¾ç »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó ´ÜÀÏ ÀüÀ̼º Á¾¾çÀÇ Ä¡·á¿¡ À־µµ ÃÖ±Ù ±× ÀÌ¿ëÀÇ ºóµµ°¡ ±Þ°ÝÈ÷ ´Ã¾î³ª´Â Ãß¼¼ÀÌ´Ù. ±×¿¡ µû¶ó ¸ñÇ¥ºÎÀ§¿¡ À־ Á¤À§¹æ»ç¼±¼ö¼úÀÇ ¼±·®ºÐÆ÷¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸´Â ¸¹ÀÌ ¹ßÇ¥µÇ°í ÀÖÀ¸³ª µÎ°³°­ ¿ÜÀÇ ¼öÁ¤Ã¼, °©»ó¼±°ú °°ÀÌ ¹æ»ç¼±ÀÇ °áÁ¤Àû ¶Ç´Â È®·üÀû È¿°ú¿¡ ¹Î°¨ÇÑ Àå±â¿Í °°Àº Á¶Á÷¿¡¼­ Èí¼öµÇ´Â ¼±·®¿¡ °üÇÑ ÀÚ·á´Â ±ØÈ÷ Á¦ÇÑÀûÀÌ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â ÀÎü¸ðÇü¿¡¼­ ¹æ»ç¼±¼ö¼ú½Ã ¼öÁ¤Ã¼ ¹× °©»ó¼±ÀÇ ¼±·®À» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ°í ±× ¼±·®¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â º¯¼ö¸¦ ±Ô¸íÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

´ë»ó ¹× ¹æ¹ý : 6 °÷ÀÇ »óÀÌÇÑ È¸ÀüÁß½ÉÁ¡¿¡¼­ °¢°¢ ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡·á¹æ»ç¼±°úÇÐ ±³½Ç¿¡¼­ °³¹ßÇÑ ¼±Çü°¡¼Ó±âÇü Á¤À§¹æ»ç¼±¼ö¼ú ±â¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Ä¡·á°èȹÀ» ¼¼¿ü´Ù. °¢ ȸÀüÁß½ÉÁ¡´ç 6°³ÀÇ arc ¸¦ ±âº»À¸·Î ÇÏ°í °¢ arcÀÇ ¹üÀ§´Â 100µµ¸¦ ±âÁØÀ¸·Î ÇÏ°í º¸Á¶Äݸ® ¸ÞÀÌÅÍ Å©±â´Â Á÷°æ 2§¯ ·Î ¼±Á¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. °¢ arc º°·Î ÃÖ´ë¼±·® 250cGy Á¶»çÇÑ ÈÄ ³»È¸ ¿­Çü±¤¼±·«°è¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ¼öÁ¤Ã¼ ¹× °©»ó¼±ÀÇ Ç¥¸é¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¼±·®À» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á °ú : ȸÀüÁß½ÉÁ¡ ¶Ç´Â arc plane ÀÌ °¢ Àå±â¿Í °¡±î¿ï¼ö·Ï Èí¼ö ¼±·®ÀÌ ³ô¾Ò´Ù. exit beamÀÌ ¼öÁ¤Ã¼³ª °©»ó¼±À» Áö³ªÁö ¾ÊÀ» °æ¿ì °¢ Àå±âÀÇ ¼±·®Àº ÃÖ´ë¼±·®ÀÇ 0.23¡¾0.08% ¿Í 0.18¡¾0.05% ÀÌ°í, exit beam ÀÌ ¼öÁ¤Ã¼³ª °©»ó¼±À» Áö³ª´Â °æ¿ì °¢ Àå±âÀÇ ¼±·®Àº ÃÖ´ë¼±·®ÀÇ 0.76¡¾0.12% ¿Í 0.41¡¾0.04% ÀÌ´Ù. exit beam ÀÇ Åë°ú ¿©ºÎ°¡ °¢ Àå±âÀÇ ¼±·®¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â °¡Àå Å« ÀÎÀÚÀ̸ç, Àå±â¸¦ Åë°úÇÏ´Â arc ¿¡ ÀÇÇØ Èí¼öÇÏ´Â ¼±·®Àº ÃÑ ¼±·®ÀÇ 80% ¸¦ Â÷ÁöÇÑ´Ù. ÀÎü ¸ðÇüÀÇ Ç¥¸é¼±·®°ú 5§® ±íÀÌ¿¡¼­ÀÇ ¼±·®¿¡ Å« Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ó¾î Ç¥¸é¼±·®À» ¼öÁ¤Ã¼ ¹× °©»ó¼± ¼±·®À¸·Î ´ëüÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù°í ÆÇ´ÜÇÑ´Ù.

°á ·Ð : Á¤À§¹æ»ç¼±¼ö¼ú½Ã ÀÎü¸ðÇüÀÇ ¼öÁ¤Ã¼¿Í °©»ó¼±¿¡ Èí¼öµÇ´Â ¹æ»ç¼±·®À» ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ °á°ú ȸÀüÁß½ÉÁ¡ ¹× arc plane ÀÌ °¢ Àå±â¿Í °¡±î¿ï¼ö·Ï ³ôÀº Èí¼ö ¼±·®À» ³ªÅ¸³»¾úÀ¸¸ç, exit beam ÀÌ ¼öÁ¤Ã¼³ª °©»ó¼±À» Åë°úÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì Èí¼ö¼±·®ÀÌ ³ô¾Ò°í exit beam ÀÇ Åë°ú ¿©ºÎ°¡ °¢ Àå±âÀÇ Èí¼ö¼±·®¿¡ °¡Àå Å« ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÃÆ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ¼öÁ¤Ã¼¿Í °©»ó¼±ÀÇ Ç¥¸é¼±·®Àº ¼öÁ¤Ã¼ ¹× °©»ó¼± ¼±·®°ú Å« Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ÃÖÀûÀÇ ¹æ»ç¼±¼ö¼úÀ» À§ÇÑ °èȹÀ» ¼ö¸³ÇÒ °æ¿ì °¢ Àå±âÀÇ ¼±·®Àº ÃÖ´ë 1% ¹Ì¸¸À¸·Î ÈÄÀ¯ÁõÀ» ÀÏÀ¸Å°±â¿¡ ³·Àº ¼±·®À̱â´Â Çϳª, ƯÈ÷ ¼Ò¾Æ µî¿¡¼­´Â °©»ó¼± ¼±·®À» °¡´ÉÇÑ ³·Ãß¾î¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.

Purpose : Although many studies have investigated the dosimetric aspects of stereotactic radiosurgery in terms of target volume. the absorbed doses at extracranial sites: especially the lens or thyroid - which are sensitive to radiation for deterministic or stochastic effect -have infrequently been reported. The aim of this study is to evaluate what effects the parameters of radiosurgery have on the absorbed doses of the lens and thyroid in patients treated by stereotactic radiosurgery, using a systematic plan in a humanoid phantom.

Materials and Methods : Six isocenters were selected and radiosurgery was planned using the stereotactic radiosurgery system which the Department of Therapeutic Radiology at Seoul National University College of Medicine developed. The experimental radiosurgery plan consisted of 6 arc planes per one isocenter, 100 degrees for each arc range and an accessory collimator diameter size of 2 §¯. After 250 cGy of irradiation from each arc, the doses absorbed at the lens and thyroid were measured by thermoluminescence dosimetry.

Results : The lens dose was 0.23¡¾0.08% of the maximum dose for each isocenter when the exit beam did not pass through the lens and was 0.76¡¾0.12% of the maximum dose for each isocenter when the exit beam passed through the lens. The thyroid dose for each isocenter when the exit 0.18¡¾0.05% of the maximum dose for each isocenter when the exit beam did not pass through the thyroid and was 0.41¡¾ 0.04% of the maximum dose for each isocenter when the exit beam passed through the thyroid. The passing of the exit beam is the most significant factor of organ dose and the absorbed dose by an arc crossing organ decides 80% of the total dose. The absorbed doses of the lens and thyroid were larger as the isocenter sites and arc planes were closer to each organ. There were no differences in the doses at the surface and 5
§® depth from the surface in the eyelid and thyroid areas.

Conclusion : As the isocenter and arc plane were placed closer to the lens and thyroid, the doses increased. Whether the exit beams passed through the lens or thyroid greatly influenced the lens and thyroid dose. The surface dose of the lens and thyroid consistently represent the tissue dose. Even when the exit beam passes through the lens and thyroid, the doses are less than 1% of the maximum dose and therefore, are too low to evoke late complications, but nevertheless. we should try to minimize the thyroid dose in children. whenever possible.

Å°¿öµå

Stereotactic radiosurgery; Thermoluminescence dosimetry; Lens; Thyroid;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS