Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

µðÁöÅÐÈ­À籸¼º»çÁø(Digitally Reconstructed Radiograph)À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Á¤À§¹æ»ç¼±¼ö¼ú ¹× Ä¡·áÀÇ Ä¡·áÀ§Ä¡ È®ÀÎ Setup Verification in Stereotactic Radiotherapy Using Digitally Reconstructed Radiograph (DRR)

´ëÇѹæ»ç¼±Á¾¾çÇÐȸÁö 1999³â 17±Ç 1È£ p.84 ~ 88
ÀÌÈ¿Áø, ¿ÀµµÈÆ, Á¤¼ö¿µ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌÈ¿Áø (  ) 
ÇѸ²´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ °­µ¿¼º½Éº´¿ø

¿ÀµµÈÆ (  ) 
ÇѸ²´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ °­µ¿¼º½Éº´¿ø
Á¤¼ö¿µ (  ) 
ÇѸ²´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ °­µ¿¼º½Éº´¿ø

Abstract

¸ñ Àû : Á¤À§¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á¿¡¼­ µðÁöÅÐÈ­À籸¼º»çÁø(Digitally Reconstructed Radiograph,
DRR)°ú Á¶»ç¹®»çÁøÀ» ºñ±³ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ȯÀÚÀÇ Ä¡·áÀ§Ä¡¸¦ Á÷Á¢ È®ÀÎÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¹æ¹ýÀ» °³¹ß
ÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù.
´ë»ó ¹× ¹æ¹ý : ºÐÇÒÁ¤À§¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á¸¦ À§ÇØ thermoplastic mask Ʋ¿¡ °íÁ¤½ÃŲ 1¸íÀÇ È¯
ÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î 4ȸ ÃÔ¿µÇÑ ÀüÈÄ ¹æÇâ(AP) ¹× Ãø¸é ¹æÇâ(lateral)¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¶»ç¹®»çÁø°ú DRR
À» ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Ä¡·áÀ§Ä¡ setup ÈÄ¿¡, Ç÷°üÁ¶¿µ¿ë Ç¥ÀûÁ¶Áرâ¿Í °°Àº fiducial marker°¡ ºÎÂø
µÈ Ç¥ÀûÁ¶Áر⸦ Á¤À§¼ö¼ú¿ë Ʋ¿¡ ºÎÂøÇÑ ÈÄ Ä¡·á¿ë ¿øÇü Äݸ®¸ÞÀÌÅÍÀÇ ¼³Ä¡ Àü°ú ÈÄ¿¡ °ã
Á¶»ç ¹æ½ÄÀ¸·Î ÃÔ¿µÇÏ¿© ÀüÈĹæÇâ ¹× Ãø¸é ¹æÇâÀÇ Á¶»ç¹®»çÁøÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù. º´º¯ ¹× Áß¿ä Àå±â
¿Í fiducial marker°£ÀÇ À§Ä¡¸¦ ÇÕ¼º½ÃŲ DRR ¿µ»óÀ» ¸¸µé¾î Á¶»ç¹®»çÁø°ú µ¿ÀÏÇÑ È®´ëÀ²
¹× Å©±â·Î Åõ¸í Çʸ§¿¡ ÀμâÇÏ¿© ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. À̷κÎÅÍ DRR°ú Á¶»ç¹®»çÁø»ó¿¡ Ç¥½ÃµÈ ÇغÎ
ÇÐÀû ±¸Á¶¿Í Ä¡·áÁß½ÉÁ¡ÀÇ °Å¸® ¿ÀÂ÷(Àüü Ä¡·á ¿ÀÂ÷), ÇغÎÇÐÀû ±¸Á¶¿Í fiducial marker°£ÀÇ
¿ÀÂ÷(ȯÀÚ°íÁ¤ ¿ÀÂ÷), ±×¸®°í Ä¡·áÁß½ÉÁ¡°ú fiducial marker°£ÀÇ ¿ÀÂ÷(Ä¡·áÁ¶ÁØ ¿ÀÂ÷)¸¦ °¢°¢
±¸ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
°á °ú : Ä¡·áÁ¶ÁØ ¿ÀÂ÷´Â °¢°¢ 1.5¡¾0.3§®(AP), 0.9¡¾0.3§®(lateral) À̾ú°í, ȯÀÚ°íÁ¤ ¿ÀÂ÷´Â
1.9¡¾0.5§®(AP), 1.9¡¾0.4§®(lateral), ±×¸®°í Àüü Ä¡·á ¿ÀÂ÷´Â AP »ó¿¡¼­ 1.6¡¾0.9§®, lateral
»ó¿¡¼­ 1.3¡¾0.4§® À̾ú´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ AP¿Í lateral ¿ÀÂ÷·Î ÀÎÇØ ¹ß»ýµÉ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â 3Â÷¿ø °ø°£»óÀÇ
ÃÖ´ë °¡´É ¿ÀÂ÷(¥ÄAP)2+(¥ÄLat)2´Â Ä¡·áÁ¶ÁØ ¿ÀÂ÷°¡ 1.7¡¾0.4§®,
ȯÀÚ°íÁ¤ ¿ÀÂ÷°¡ 2.6¡¾0.6§®, ±×¸®°í Àüü Ä¡·á ¿ÀÂ÷´Â 2.3¡¾0.7§®·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
°á ·Ð : DRR ¿µ»óÀ» À籸¼ºÇÏ´Â ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» °³¹ßÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, DRR ¿µ»óÀ» Á¶»ç¹®»çÁø°ú ºñ
±³ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á Á¤À§¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á¿¡¼­ Á÷Á¢ÀûÀÎ Ä¡·áÀ§Ä¡ È®ÀÎÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÏ¿´´Ù.

Purpose : To develop a method for verifying a treatment setup in stereotactic
radiotherapy by matching portal images to DRRs.
Materials and Methods : Four pairs of orthogonal portal images of one patient
immobilized by a thermoplastic mask frame for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy
were compared with DRRs. Portal images are obtained in AP (anterior/posterior) and
lateral directions with a target localizer box containing fiducial markers attached to a
stereotactic frame. DRRs superimposed over a planned isocenter and fiducial markers are
printed out on transparent films. And then, they were overlaid over orthogonal portal
images by matching anatomical strictures. From three different kind of objects
(isocenter, fiducial markers, anatomical structure) on DRRs and portal images, the
displacement error between anatomical structure and isocenters (overall setup error), the
displacement error between anatomical structure and fiducial markers (immobilization
error), and the displacement error between fiducial markers and isocenters (localization
error) were measured.
Results : Localization errors were 1.5¡¾0.3 §®(AP), 0.9¡¾0.3 §® (lateral), and
immobilization errors were 1.9¡¾0.5 §® (AP), 1.9¡¾0.4 §® (lateral). In addition, overall
setup errors were 1.6¡¾0.9 §® (AP), 1.3¡¾0.4 §® (lateral). From these orthogonal
displacement errors, maximum 3D displacement errors(¥ÄAP)2+(¥Ä
Lat)2 were found to be 1.7¡¾0.4 §® for localization, 2.6¡¾0.6 §® for
immobilization, and 2.3¡¾0.7 §® for overall treatment setup.
Conclusion : By comparing orthogonal portal images with DRRs, we find out that it is
possible to verify treatment setup directly in stereotactic radiotherapy.

Å°¿öµå

Á¤À§¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á; µðÁöÅÐÈ­À籸¼º»çÁø; Ä¡·áÀ§Ä¡ È®ÀÎ; Stereotactic radiotherapy; DRR; Setup verification;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS