Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÇÏÀü¹æ ÀýÁ¦¼úÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÑ Á÷Àå¾Ï ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ¹æ»ç¼±Á¶»ç ¿µ¿ª ÇÏ¿¬ÀÇ °³º°È­ Individualized Determination of Lower Margin in Pelvic Radiation Field after Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer Resulted in Equivalent Local Control and Radiation Volume Reduction Compared with Traditional Method

´ëÇѹæ»ç¼±Á¾¾çÇÐȸÁö 2000³â 18±Ç 3È£ p.194 ~ 199
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹Ú¼®¿ø/Suk Won Park ¾È¿ëÂù/Çã½ÂÀç/ÀüÈ£°æ/°­¿ø±â/±è´ë¿ë/ÀÓµµÈÆ/ÀÓµµÈÆ/ÀÌÁ¤Àº/Yong Chan Ahn/Seung Jae Huh/Ho Kyung Chun/Won Ki Kang/Dae Yong Kim/Do Hoon Lim/Young Ju Noh/Jung Eun Lee

Abstract

¸ñ Àû : Á÷Àå¾ÏÀÇ ¸²ÇÁ¾× ¹è¾×ÀÇ ÁÖµÈ °æ·Î´Â Á¾¾çÀÇ À§Ä¡°¡ Ç×¹®È¯¿¡ ±ÙÁ¢ÇÑ °æ¿ì¸¦ Á¦¿ÜÇÏ°í´Â ±ÙÀ§ºÎ¸¦ ÇâÇϹǷΠ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·áÀÇ Á¶»ç¿µ¿ªÀ» °áÁ¤ÇÔ¿¡ À־ ÀüÅëÀûÀÎ ¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¸¦ °æ¿ì ÇϺΠ°ñ¹Ý°­°ú ȸÀ½ºÎ¿¡ ºÒÇÊ¿äÇÑ ¹æ»ç¼±Á¶»ç¸¦ ÇÏ°ÔµÉ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. º»
¿¬±¸´Â
ÇÏÀü¹æ ÀýÁ¦¼úÀ» ½ÃÇà¹ÞÀº Á÷Àå¾Ï ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á Á¶»ç¿µ¿ªÀÇ ÇÏ¿¬À» ÀüÅëÀûÀÎ ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÏÁö ¾Ê°í ¼ö¼ú ¹®ÇպηκÎÅÍ 2 cm ³»Áö 3 cm ÇϹæÀ¸·Î ȯÀÚ °³º°ÀûÀ¸·Î °áÁ¤ÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì¿¡ À־ Ä¡·á ½ÇÆÐÀÇ ¾ç»óÀÌ ¾î¶°ÇÑ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹Þ´Â°¡¸¦ ¾Ë¾Æº¸±â À§ÇÏ¿©
¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù.
´ë»ó ¹× ¹æ¹ý : 1994³â 9¿ùºÎÅÍ 1998³â 5¿ù±îÁö ¼º±Õ°üÀÇ´ë »ï¼º¼­¿ïº´¿ø¿¡¼­ ±ÙÄ¡Àû ÇÏÀü¹æ ÀýÁ¦¼ú°ú ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÑ Modified Astler-Coller (MAC) º´±â B2¿¡¼­ C3±îÁöÀÎ 88¸íÀÇ Á÷Àå¾Ï ȯÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ³²³à ȯÀÚ ¼ö´Â °¢°¢ 44¸í¾¿À̾úÀ¸¸ç
¿¬·ÉÀÇ
Áß¾Ó°ªÀº 57¼¼(32-81¼¼)¿´´Ù. 2¸íÀÇ È¯ÀÚ¸¦ Á¦¿ÜÇÑ ¸ðµç ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ Àú¿ë·®ÀÇ 5-fluorouracilÀ» Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ Ç×¾Ï È­Çпä¹ýÀ» º´¿ëÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á´Â 6, 10, 15 MV X-ray¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ÈÄÀü-ÁÂ¿ì ´ëÇâÀÇ 3¹® Á¶»ç¹ýÀ¸·Î Àü°ñ¹ÝºÎ¿¡ 45 Gy¿Í Á¾¾ç º´¼ÒºÎÀ§¿¡ 6
Gy¸¦
5.5ÁÖ°£¿¡ °ÉÃļ­ Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¬±¸ ±â°£ ÃʱâÀÇ 16¸íÀÇ È¯ÀÚ¿¡¼­´Â ÀüÅëÀûÀÎ ¹æ»ç¼±Á¶»ç¿µ¿ª °áÁ¤¹ýÀ» Àû¿ëÇÏ¿© Æó»ö°ø ÇÏ´Ü, ¶Ç´Â ¼ö¼ú ¹®ÇÕºÎÀÇ 2 cm ³»Áö 3 cm ÇϹæ Áß¿¡¼­ º¸´Ù ³·Àº ÂÊÀ» ¹æ»ç¼±Á¶»ç¿µ¿ªÀÇ ÇÏ¿¬À¸·Î Á¤ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ³ª¸ÓÁö 72¸íÀÇ È¯ÀÚ¿¡¼­´Â
¼ö¼ú
¹®Çպο¡¼­ 2 cm ³»Áö 3 cm ÇϹ濡¼­ Á¶»ç¿µ¿ª ÇÏ¿¬À» °³º°ÀûÀ¸·Î °áÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Âµ¥ ÀÌ¿Í °°Àº °³º°È­µÈ ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á Á¶»ç¿µ¿ªÀÇ °áÁ¤À¸·Î 55¸í(76%)ÀÇ È¯ÀÚ¿¡¼­ ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á Á¶»ç¿µ¿ª ºÎÇǸ¦ °¨¼Ò½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ µÎ ±º¿¡ ´ëÇØ »ýÁ¸À², ±¹¼Ò Á¾¾ç ¾ïÁ¦À²,
¹«º´»ýÁ¸À²À»
Á¶»çÇÏ¿© ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´°í ¿¹ÈÄ ÀÎÀÚÀÇ À¯ÀǼºÀ» Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù.
°á °ú : ÃßÀû °üÂû ±â°£Àº 7°³¿ùºÎÅÍ 58°³¿ùÀ̾úÀ¸¸ç, Áß¾Ó ÃßÀû±â°£Àº 27°³¿ùÀ̾ú´Ù. MAC º´±â·Î ±¸ºÐ ½Ã B2°¡ 32¸í(36%), B3°¡ 2¸í(2%), C1ÀÌ 2¸í(2%), C2°¡ 50¸í(57%), C3°¡ 2¸í(2%) À̾ú´Ù. Àüü ȯÀÚÀÇ 2³â°ú 4³â »ýÁ¸À²Àº °¢°¢ 94%¿Í 68%¿´À¸¸ç, 2³â°ú 4³â
¹«º´
»ýÁ¸À²Àº °¢°¢ 86%°ú 58%¿´´Ù. ù Ä¡·á ½ÇÆзμ­ ±¹¼Ò Àç¹ßÀÌ 4¸í, ¿ø°ÝÀüÀÌ°¡ 14¸í, ±×¸®°í ±¹¼Ò Àç¹ß°ú ¿ø°ÝÀüÀÌ°¡ µ¿½Ã¿¡ ÀÖ´Â °æ¿ì°¡ 1¸íÀ̾ú´Ù. ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á Á¶»ç¿µ¿ªÀÇ ÇÏ¿¬ °áÁ¤À» ÀüÅëÀûÀÎ ¹æ¹ýÀ» Àû¿ëÇÑ ±º°ú ¼ö¼ú ¹®ÇÕºÎÀÇ À§Ä¡¿¡ µû¶ó¼­ ȯÀÚ °³º°ÀûÀ¸·Î
°áÁ¤ÇÑ
±ºÀ» ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© º¼ ¶§ ±¹¼Ò Á¾¾ç ¾ïÁ¦À²°ú ¹«º´ »ýÁ¸À²Àº °¢°¢ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Åë°èÀûÀÎ Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù( p=0.42, p=0.68). Á¾¾ç »öÀüÀÚÀÇ Á¸Àç´Â »ýÁ¸À², ±¹¼Ò Á¾¾ç ¾ïÁ¦À², ¹«º´ »ýÁ¸À²¿¡ °¢°¢ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â À¯ÀÇÇÑ À§ÇèÀÎÀÚ·Î °üÂûµÇ¾ú´Ù.
°á ·Ð : ÇÏÀü¹æ ÀýÁ¦¼úÀ» ½ÃÇà¹ÞÀº Á÷Àå¾Ï ȯÀÚµéÀÇ ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á Á¶»ç¿µ¿ªÀÇ ÇÏ¿¬À» °áÁ¤ÇÔ¿¡ À־ °¢ ȯÀÚµéÀÇ º´¼Ò À§Ä¡¿¡ µû¶ó °³º°ÀûÀ¸·Î °áÁ¤ÇÏ´Â ¹æ¹ýÀº ÀüÅëÀûÀÎ ÇÏ¿¬ °áÁ¤¹æ¹ý¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© ±¹¼Ò Á¾¾ç ¾ïÁ¦À²°ú ¹«º´»ýÁ¸À²¿¡ À־ µ¿µîÇÑ °á°ú¸¦
¾òÀ»
¼ö
ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á Á¶»ç¿µ¿ªÀÇ ºÎÇǸ¦ ÁÙ¿© ÁÜÀ¸·Î½á ºÒÇÊ¿äÇÑ ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á ºÎÀÛ¿ë°ú ÈÄÀ¯ÁõÀÇ °¨¼Ò¸¦ ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆǴܵȴÙ.

Purpose : When determining the lower margin of post-operative pelvic radiation therapy field according to the traditional method (recommended by Gunderson), the organs located in the low pelvic cavity and the perineum are vulnerable to
unnecessary
radiation. This study evaluated the effect of individualized determination of the lower margin at 2 cm to 3 cm below the anastomotic site on the failure patterns.
Materials and Methods : Authors included 88 patients with modified Astler-Coller (MAC) stages from B2 through C3, who received low anterior resection and post-operative pelvic radiation therapy from Sept. 1994 to May 1998 at Samsung Medical
Center,
Sungkyunkwan University. The numbers of male and female patients were 44 and 44, and the median age was 57 years (range: 32-81 years). Three field technique (posterior-anterior and bilateral portals) by 6, 10, 15 MV X-rays was used to deliver
4,500
cGy
to the whole pelvis followed by 600 cGy's small field boost to the tumor bed over 5.5 weeks. Sixteen patients received radiation therapy by traditional field margin determination, and the lower margin was set either at the low margin of the
obturator
foramen or at 2 cm to 3 cm below the anastomotic site, whichever is lower. In 72 patients, the lower margin was set at 2 cm to 3 cm below the anastomotic site, irrespectively of the obturator foramen, by which the reduction of radiation volume
was
possible in 55 patients (76%). Authors evaluated and compared survival, local control, and disease-free survival rates of these two groups.
Results : The median follow-up period was 27 months (range : 7-58 months). MAC stages were B2 in 32 (36%), B3 in 2 (2%), C1 in 2 (2%), C2 in 50 (57%), and C3 in 2 (2%) patients, respectively. The entire patients' overall survival rates at 2 and 4
years
were 94% and 68%, respectively, and disease-free survival rates at 2 and 4 years were 86% and 58%, respectively. The first failure sites were local only in 4, distant only in 14, and combined local and distant in 1 patient, respectively. There
was
no
significant difference with respect to local control and disease-free survival rates ( p=0.42, p=0.68) between two groups of different lower margin determination policies.
Conclusion : The new concept in the individualized determination of the lower margin depending on the anastomotic site has led to the equivalent local control and disease-free survival rates, and is expected to contribute to the reduction of
unnecessary
radiation-related morbidity by reduction of radiation volume, compared with the traditional method of lower margin determination.

Å°¿öµå

Á÷Àå¾Ï; ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á; Á¶»ç¿µ¿ª ºÎÇÇ; Rectal cancer; Pelvic radiation therapy; Radiation volume;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS