Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀڱðæºÎ¾Ï ȯÀÚÀÇ ¿¹ÈÄÀÎÀÚ¿¡ °üÇÑ ºÐ¼® An Analysis of Prognostic Factors in the Uterine Cervical Cancer Patients

´ëÇѹæ»ç¼±Á¾¾çÇÐȸÁö 2000³â 18±Ç 4È£ p.300 ~ 308
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¾ç´ë½Ä/Dae Sik Yang À±¿ø¼·/±èÅÂÇö/±èö¿ë/ÃÖ¸í¼±/Won Sub Yoon/Tae Hyun Kim/Chul Yong Kim/Myung Sun Choi

Abstract

¸ñÀû: ÀڱðæºÎ¾ÏÀº ¿ì¸®³ª¶ó ¿©¼º¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ¸¹Àº ¹ß»ýÀ» º¸ÀÌ´Â ¾Ç¼ºÁ¾¾çÀ¸·Î ºñ±³Àû ¿ÏÄ¡À²ÀÌ ³ôÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î ¾Ë·ÁÁ® ÀÖ´Ù. ÀڱðæºÎ¾ÏÀÇ Ä¡·á´Â º´¿ø ¸¶´Ù ¸Å¿ì ´Ù¾çÇØÁ³À¸³ª ¹æ»ç¼±¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Ä¡·á°¡ ÁÖÀÌ¸ç ³ôÀº ¿ÏÄ¡À²À» ¾ò°í ÀÖ´Ù. Ä¡·áÀÇ ½ÇÆд ´ëºÎºÐ 3³âÀ̳»¿¡
ÀϾ¸ç, ±¹¼ÒÀç¹ß½Ã¿¡´Â ÀÚ±Ã¹æ °áÇÕÁ¶Á÷¿¡¼­ ´õ ¸¹ÀÌ Àç¹ßÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î º¸°íµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ ÀúÀÚµéÀº ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á¸¦ ¹ÞÀº ÀڱðæºÎ¾Ï ȯÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î À̵éÀÇ Ä¡·á¼ºÀû°ú Àç¹ß¿©ºÎ¸¦ ÈÄÇâÀûÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© »ýÁ¸·ü°ú Àç¹ß¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ÀÎÀÚµéÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿©
º¸¾Ò´Ù.
´ë»ó ¹× ¹æ¹ý: 1981³â 1¿ù 1ÀϺÎÅÍ 1998³â 12¿ù 31ÀϱîÁö °í·Á´ëÇб³ ¹æ»ç¼± Á¾¾çÇаú¿¡¼­
ÀڱðæºÎ¾ÏÀ¸·Î ¹æ»ç¼± Ä¡·á¸¦ ¹ÞÀº 970¸íÁß ÃßÀû°üÂûÀÌ °¡´ÉÇß´ø 827¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿´
´Ù. ´ë»óȯÀÚ´Â ¹æ»ç¼± ´Üµ¶Ä¡·á±º°ú ¼ö¼úÈÄ ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á±ºÀ¸·Î ³ª´©¾úÀ¸¸ç °¢ ȯÀÚ¿¡ ´ëÇÏ
¿© ³ªÀÌ, ÀÓ»óÀû º´±â, ¼¼Æ÷º´¸®ÇÐÀû ¼Ò°ß, Àç¹ßÀ¯¹« µîÀÌ Ä¡·á°á°ú¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ¾Ë¾Æº¸
¾Ò°í ƯÈ÷ Ä¡·á ÈÄ ÀڱðæºÎÁú¼¼Æ÷Áø°Ë»ç(Papanicolaou smear; Pap smear), ¹è¾Æ¼ºÇ׿ø
(carcinoembryogenic antigen; CEA)¿Í ÆíÆò»óÇǾÏÁ¾Ç׿ø(squamous cell carcinoma antigen;
SCC antigen) ¼öÄ¡°¡ »ýÁ¸·ü°ú ±¹¼ÒÀç¹ß¿¡ À¯ÀÇÇÑ ÀÎÀÚÀΰ¡¸¦ ¾Ë¾Æº¸¾Ò´Ù.
°á°ú: ÀüüȯÀÚÀÇ Æò±Õ³ªÀÌ´Â 51.3¼¼(¹æ»ç¼± ´Üµ¶Ä¡·á±º; 53.1¼¼, ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ Ä¡·á±º; 48.3¼¼)¿´
°í, Æò±Õ ÃßÀû°üÂû±â°£Àº 38.6%°³¿ù(¹æ»ç¼± ´Üµ¶Ä¡·á±º; 38.3°³¿ù, ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ Ä¡·á±º; 38.4°³¿ù)
À̾ú´Ù. ¹æ»ç¼± ´Üµ¶Ä¡·á±ºÀÇ °æ¿ì ´ë»óȯÀÚ´Â 521¸íÀ̾ú°í, ÀÓ»óº´±â´Â CIS; 5¸í, IA; 3¸í,
IB 36¸í, IIA; 77¸í, IIB; 284¸í, IIA; 31¸í, IIB; 47¸í, IVA; 21¸í, IVB; 3¸í, Àç¹ß¾Ï; 14¸íÀÌ
¾ú´Ù. ¼¼Æ÷º´¸®ÇÐÀû ¼Ò°ß»ó ÆíÆò»óÇǾÏ; 495¸í, ¼±¼¼Æ÷¾Ï; 23¸íÀ̾ú°í ¿ÏÄ¡»óÅ·ΠÃßÀû°üÂû
µÈ ȯÀÚ´Â 314¸í(60.3%), ±¹¼ÒÀç¹ß; 47¸í(9%), ´ëµ¿¸Æ ¸²ÇÁÀýÀüÀÌ; 28¸í(5%), ÆóÀüÀÌ; 19¸í
(4%), °ñÀüÀÌ; 12¸í(2%)À̾ú´Ù. ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ Ä¡·á±ºÀº 326¸íÀ̾ú°í ÀÓ»óº´±â´Â CIS; 6¸í, IA; 50
¸í, IB; 181¸í, IIA; 46¸í, IIB; 43¸íÀ̾ú´Ù. ¼¼Æ÷º´¸®ÇÐÀû ¼Ò°ß»ó ÆíÆò»óÇǾÏ; 291¸í, ¼±¼¼Æ÷
¾Ï; 32¸íÀ̾ú°í, ¿ÏÄ¡»óÅ·ΠÃßÀû°üÂûµÈ ȯÀÚ´Â 276¸í(85%), ±¹¼ÒÀç¹ß; 8¸í(2%), ´ëµ¿¸Æ ¸²
ÇÁÀýÀüÀÌ; 7¸í(2%), ÆóÀüÀÌ; 10¸í(3%), °ñÀüÀÌ; 10(3%)À̾ú´Ù. ÀüüȯÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÑ
°á°ú 5³â »ýÁ¸À²Àº 71.2%(¹æ»ç¼± ´Üµ¶Ä¡·á±º; 55.8%, ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ Ä¡·á±º; 88.1%)¿´°í »ýÁ¸À²¿¡
À־´Â ´Üº¯·®ºÐ¼®»ó ÀÓ»óº´±â(p=0.0001), Àç¹ßÀ¯¹«(p=0.0001), ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á ÈÄ ÀڱðæºÎÁú
¼¼Æ÷Áø°â»ç(p=0.0329), CEA¼öÄ¡(¡Ã5 ng/mlÀÎ °æ¿ì, SCC´Â ¡Ã2 ng/mlÀÎ °æ¿ì°¡ 2~3¹è ³ôÀº
°ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
°á·Ð: ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á ÈÄ Pap smear, CEA, SCC´Â »ýÁ¸À²°ú Àç¹ßÀ²¿¡ ¸ðµÎ ºñ±³Àû ÀǹÌÀÖ°Ô ÀÛ
¿ëÇÏ´Â ¿¹ÈÄÀÎÀÚ·Î ³ªÅ¸³ª ¾ÕÀ¸·Î ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á ÈÄ È¯ÀÚÀÇ ÃßÀû°üÂû½Ã ÀڱðæºÎ¾ÏÀÇ ±¹¼ÒÀç¹ß
°ú ÀüÀÌ ±×¸®°í »ýÁ¸·üÀ» ¹Ì¸® ¿¹°ßÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÁöÇ¥·Î »ïÀ» ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù.

Purpose: The aim of this study is to analysis of survival and recurrence rates of the uterine cervical carcinoma patients whom received the radiation therapy respectively. The prognostic factors, such as Papanicolaou (Pap) smear,
carcinoembriogenic
antigen (CEA) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) antigen has been studied.
Methods and Materials: From January 1981 to December 1998, eight-hundred
twenty-seven uterine cervical cancer patients were treated with radiation therapy. All of
the patients were divided into two group: the radiation therapy only (521 patients)group
and the postoperative radiation therapy (326 patients) group. The age, treatment
modality, clinical stage, histopathology, recurrence, follow-up Pap smears, CEA and SCC
antigen were used as parameters for the evaluation. The prognostic factors such as
survival and recurrence rates were performed with the Kaplan-Meier method and the
Cox hazard mo del, respectively. Median follow-up was 38.6 months.
Results: On the radiation therapy only group, 314 patients (60%) achieved complete
response (CR), 47 patients (9%) showed local recurrence (LR), 78 patients (15%)
developed distant metastasis (DM). On the postoperative radiation therapy group, showed
276 patients (85%) CR, 8 patients (2%) LR, 37 patients(11%) DM. The 5-year survival
and recurrence rates was evaluated for all parameters. The statistically significant
factors for the survival rate in univariate analysis were clinical stage (p=0.0001),
treatment modality (p=0.0010), recurrence (p=0.0001), Pap smear (p=0.0329), CEA
(p=0.001), SCC antigen (p=0.001).
Conclusion: This study indicated that after treatment, the follow-up studies of Pap
smear, CEA and SCC antigen were significant parameter and prediction factors for the
survival and recurrence of the ulterine cervical carcinoma.

Å°¿öµå

ÀڱðæºÎ¾Ï; ¿¹ÈÄÀÎÀÚ; Pap smear; CEA; SCC antigen; Ulterine cervical cancer; Prognostic factor; Pap smear; Carcinoembryogenic antigen (CEA); Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) antigen;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS