Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¹æ»ç¼± °¨¼ö¼º ÃøÁ¤¹ýÀ¸·Î MTT ¹ý ½ÃÇà ½ÃÀÇ ÃÖÀû Á¶°Ç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸ The Optimal Condition of Performing MTT Assay for the Determination of Radiation Sensitivity

´ëÇѹæ»ç¼±Á¾¾çÇÐȸÁö 2001³â 19±Ç 2È£ p.163 ~ 170
È«¼¼¹Ì, ±èÀÏÇÑ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
È«¼¼¹Ì (  ) 
¼­¿ï´ëÇб³

±èÀÏÇÑ (  ) 
¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ÀÇÇבּ¸¿ø ¹æ»ç¼±ÀÇÇבּ¸¼Ò

Abstract

¸ñÀû: ¹æ»ç¼±Á¶»çÈÄ ¼¼Æ÷ÀÇ »ýÁ¸ ºÐȹÀº ¼¼Æ÷Áý¶ô ÃøÁ¤±â¹ýÀ¸·Î È®ÀÎÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ Ç¥ÁØÀ̳ª ¸¹Àº ºñ¿ë°ú ½Ã°£ÀÌ ¼Ò¿äµÇ´Â ´ÜÁ¡À» °®°í ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ »ýÁ¸ ¼¼Æ÷ÀÇ tetrazolium¿°ÀÇ ÀÚ»ö formazan ħÀü¹°·ÎÀÇ È¯¿ø½ÃÅ°´Â ´É·Â¿¡ ±× ±â¹ÝÀ» µÐ MTT ±â¹ýÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ¼¼Æ÷Áý¶ô
ÃøÁ¤±â¹ýÀ» ´ëüÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ±â¹ýÀ¸·Î¼­ÀÇ À¯¿ë¼º°ú ±× ½ÇÇà»óÀÇ ÃÖÀûÁ¶°ÇÀ» ±Ô¸íÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
¹æ¹ý: PCI-1, SNU-1066, NCI-H630, RKO µîÀÇ ¼¼Æ÷ÁÖ¿¡ 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 GyÀÇ ¹æ»ç¼±À»
Á¶»çÇÑ ÈÄ ¼¼Æ÷Áý¶ô ÃøÁ¤±â¹ý°ú MTT±â¹ýÀ¸·Î ¼¼Æ÷ »ýÁ¸ ºÐȹÀ» Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù ¼¼Æ÷Áý¶ô ÃøÁ¤
±â¹ýÀº 25 §² Æú¸®½ºÆ¼·» ¹è¾ç Çöó½ºÅ©¿¡ ¹æ»ç¼±·®¿¡ µû¶ó ´Ù¸¥ ¼öÀÇ ¼¼Æ÷¸¦ ºÐÁÖÇÑ ÈÄ 24
½Ã°£ µ¿¾È ¹è¾ç ÈÄ ¹æ»ç¼±À» Á¶»çÇÏ¿´°í À̸¦ 10~14ÀÏ µ¿¾È ¹è¾ç ÈÄ ¿°»öÇÏ¿© »ý¼ºµÈ ¼¼Æ÷
Áý¶ôÀÇ ¼ö¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. MTT±â¹ýÀº ħÀü¹°ÀÇ ¿ëÇØ°úÁ¤ÀÌ ÇÊ¿ä¾ø´Â Premix WST-1 ½Ã¾à
À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. MTT±â¹ýÀº °¢°¢ÀÇ ¼¼Æ÷ÁÖ¿¡¼­ ¼¼Æ÷¼ö¿Í Èí±¤µµ°£ÀÇ ¼±Çü°ü°è¿Í
ÃÖÀû ½ÇÇèÁ¶°ÇÀ» È®ÀÎÇÑ ÀÌÈÄ ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù ÀÌ ±â¹ýÀº ¹æ»ç¼±À» Á¶»ç¹ÞÀº ¼¼Æ÷¿¡¼­´Â Áö¼öÀû
¼ºÀåÀ» ȸº¹ÇÑ ÀÌÈÄ¿Í ¹æ»ç¼±À» Á¶»ç¹ÞÁö ¾ÊÀº ¼¼Æ÷´Â 4ȸ ÀÌ»óÀÇ ¼¼Æ÷ºÐ¿­À» °ÅÄ£ ÈÄ¿¡ ½Ã
ÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼¼Æ÷Áý¶ô ÃøÁ¤±â¹ý ¹× MTT±â¹ýÀ» ÅëÇÏ¿© ¾òÀº ¼¼Æ÷ »ýÁ¸À²À» ±¸ÇÑ ÈÄ À̸¦ Áö
Ç¥·Î ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
°á°ú: °¢ ±â¹ýÀ¸·Î ¾òÀº ¼¼Æ÷ »ýÁ¸À²ÀÇ Ç¥ÁØÆíÂ÷´Â 5% ³»¿Ü¿´´Ù. 2°¡Áö ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î ±¸ÇÑ ¼¼Æ÷
»ýÁ¸À²Àº t-test·Î ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´À» ¶§ 0~4 Gy ¿¡¼­´Â Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾úÀ¸¸ç ȸ±Í
ºÐ¼® °á°ú´Â ¼±ÇüÀû °ü°è°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.(R2=0.975-0.992). MTT ±â¹ýÀÇ ½ÃÇà¿¡ ÃÖ
ÀûÀÎ ¼¼Æ÷¼ö´Â ¹è¾çÈ¿À²¿¡ µû¶ó ´Ù¸¥ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Âµ¥, ¹è¾çÈ¿À²ÀÌ 30% ÀÌ»ó À̸é 300°³
ÀÌÇÏ°¡, 30% ¹Ì¸¸ÀÎ °æ¿ì´Â 500~1,000°³°¡ Àû´çÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î È®ÀεǾú´Ù. MTT±â¹ýÀº 6 ¹è°¡
½Ã°£ °æ°ú ÀÌÈÄ¿¡ ½ÃÇàÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ¼¼Æ÷Áý¶ô ÃøÁ¤±â¹ý°ú °¡Àå ±ÙÁ¢ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç Àû¾îµµ 4 ¹è°¡½Ã
°£ ÀÌÈÄ¿¡ ½ÃÇàÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÇ¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ µû¸£¸é ¹è°¡½Ã°£ÀÌ 3ÀÏ ÀÌÇÏÀÎ
¼¼Æ÷ÁÖ°¡ ¼¼Æ÷ ¹Î°¨¼º ÃøÁ¤¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î¼­ MTT ±â¹ýÀÌ ¼¼Æ÷Áý¶ô ÃøÁ¤ ±â¹ýÀ» ´ëüÇÏ¿© »ç¿ëÇÏ
±â¿¡ ÀûÇÕÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÇ¾ú´Ù.
°á·Ð: À̻󿡼­, MTT±â¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ¹æ»ç¼±Á¶»ç ÈÄÀÇ ¼¼Æ÷»ýÁ¸À» ÃøÁ¤Çϱâ À§Çؼ­´Â ¿¹
ºñ½ÇÇèÀ» ÅëÇØ °¢ ¼¼Æ÷ÁÖ¿¡¼­ÀÇ ÃÖÀûÀÇ Á¶°ÇÀ» ã´Â °ÍÀÌ ÇʼöÀûÀ̸ç ÀÌ Á¶°ÇÇÏ¿¡¼­ MTT
±â¹ýÀ» ½ÃÇàÇؾ߸¸ ¹æ»ç¼±¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¼¼Æ÷ ¹Î°¨¼º ÃøÁ¤¿¡ ÀÌ¿ëµÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ½À» È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù.

Purpose: The measurement of radiation survival using a clonogenic assay, the established standard, can be difficult and time consuming. In this study, We have used the MTT assay, based on the reduction of a tetrazolium salt to a purple formazan
precipitate by living cells, as a substitution for clonogenic assay and have examined the optimal condition for performing this assay in determination of radiation sensitivity.
Material and Methods: Four human cancer cell lines -PCI-1, SNU-1066, NCI-H630 and
RKO cells have been used. For each cell line, a clonogenic assay and a MTT assay
using Premix WST-1 solution, which is one of the tetrazolium salts and does not
require washing or solubilization of the precipitate were carried out after irradiation of 0,
2, 4, 6, 8, 10 Gy. For clonogenic assay, cells in 25 §² flasks were irradiated after
overnight incubation and the resultant colonies containing more than 50 cells were
scored after culturing the cells for 10~14 days. For MTT assay, the relationship between
absorbance and cell number, optimal seeding cell number, and optimal timing of assay
was determined. Then, MTT assay was performed when the irradiated cells had
regained exponential growth or when the non-irradiated cells had undergone four or
more doubling times.
Results: There was minimal variation in the values gained from these two methods with
the standard deviation generally less than 5%, and there were no statistically significant
difference between two methods according to t-test in low radiation dose (below 6 Gy).
The regression analyses showed high linear correlation with the R2 value
of 0.975~0.992 between data from the two different methods. The optimal cell numbers
for MTT assay were found to be dependent on plating efficiency of used cell line. Less
than 300 cells/well were appropriate for cells with high plating efficiency (more than
30%). For cells with low plating efficiency (less than 30%), 500 cells/well or more were
appropriate for assay. The optimal time for MTT assay was after 6 doubling times for
the results compatible with those of clonogenic assay, at least after 4 doubling times
was required for valid results. In consideration of practical limits of assay (12 days, in
this study) cells with doubling time more than 3 days were inappropriate for application.
Conclusion: In conclusion, it is found that MTT assay can successfully replace
clonogenic assay of tested cancer cell lines after irradiation only if MTT assay was
undertaken with optimal assay conditions that included plating efficiency of each cell line
and doubling time at least.

Å°¿öµå

MTT¹ý; ¼¼Æ÷Áý¶ô ÃøÁ¤±â¹ý; ¹æ»ç¼± °¨¼ö¼º; Clonogenic assay; MTT assay; Radiation sensitivity;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS