Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀڱðæºÎ¾Ï ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á ÈÄ¿¡ ¹ß»ýÇÑ Á÷ÀåÃâÇ÷°ú Ä¡·á Rectal Bleeding and Its Management after Irradiation for Cervix Cancer

´ëÇѹæ»ç¼±Á¾¾çÇÐȸÁö 2002³â 20±Ç 4È£ p.343 ~ 352
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Àü¹Ì¼±/Mi Son Chun °­½ÂÈñ/±æÈÆÁ¾/¿À¿µÅÃ/¼ÕÁ¤Çý/Á¤Çý¿µ/À¯Èñ¼®/À̱¤Àç/Seung Hee Kang/Hoon Jong Kil/Young Taek Oh/Jeong Hye Sohn/Hye Young Jung/Hee Suk Ryu/Kwang Jae Lee

Abstract

¸ñÀû: ÀڱðæºÎ¾ÏÀÇ °æ¿ì Á¾¾ç¿¡ ÃæºÐÇÑ ¾çÀÇ ¹æ»ç¼±À» Á¶»çÇϱâ À§Çؼ­´Â Á÷Àåµµ °í¼±·®ÀÇ ¹æ»ç¼±À» ¹Þ°Ô µÈ´Ù. ÀÌ·Î ÀÎÇØ Á÷Àå¿°À» ºñ·ÔÇÑ ¸¸¼ººÎÀÛ¿ëÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇϸç Á÷Àå ÃâÇ÷ ºóµµ¸¦ 5~30%·Î º¸°íÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ÀúÀÚ´Â ¿ÏÄ¡ ¸ñÀûÀÇ ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á¸¦ ¹ÞÀº
ÀڱðæºÎ¾Ï
ȯÀÚµéÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î Á÷Àå ÃâÇ÷ ºóµµ¿Í ±×¿Í °ü·ÃµÈ À§ÇèÀÎÀÚµéÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ°í Ä¡·á ¹æ¹ýÀ» »ìÆ캸°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù.

´ë»ó ¹× ¹æ¹ý: 1994³â 9¿ù°ú 1999³â 12¿ù »çÀÌ¿¡ ¹æ»ç¼± ´Üµ¶Ä¡·á¸¦ ¹ÞÀº 213¸íÀÇ ÀڱðæºÎ¾Ï ȯÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù. 90¸íÀÌ ¿ÜºÎ ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·áÀÇ ÀϺθ¦ ÇÏ·ç 2ȸ¾¿ ¹Þ¾Ò´Ù(º¯ÇüµÈ ´ÙºÐÇÒ ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á). ÀÚ±ÃÁÖÀ§Á¶Á÷ÀÇ ¿ÜºÎ ¹æ»ç¼±·®Àº ÃÑ 51~59 §í¿´°í
±ÙÁ¢¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á·Î AÁ¡¿¡ ÃÑ 28~30 §í (4 §í¾¿ 7ȸ ȤÀº 5 §í¾¿ 6ȸ)¸¦ Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù. Á÷Àå¿¡ Á¶»çµÈ ¼±·®Àº ICRU 38¿¡¼­ Á¤ÇÑ À§Ä¡¿Í, ¸ðÀÇÃÔ¿µÇʸ§¿¡¼­ ¹Ù¸®¿ò¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ±¸ºÐµÇ´Â Á÷Àå ¾ÕÂÊ º®ÀÇ ÇÑ Á¡À» ¼±Á¤ÇÏ¿© °è»êÇÏ¿´´Ù. Á÷ÀåÃâÇ÷ÀÇ Á¤µµ´Â LENT/SOMA¿¡ µû¶ó
ºÐ·ùÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÃßÀû°üÂû ±â°£Àº 12~86°³¿ù(Áß¾Ó°ª 39°³¿ù)À̾ú´Ù.

°á°ú: 27¸í(12.7%)ÀÇ È¯ÀÚ¿¡¼­ Á÷ÀåÃâÇ÷ÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇÏ¿´´Ù(µî±Þ 2¿Í 3:°¢°¢ 16¸í°ú 2¸í, 8.5%). À̵é Áß¿¡¼­ ÃßÀû°üÂû ±â°£µ¿¾È Áú-Á÷Àå·ç ¶Ç´Â Æó¼â·Î ÁøÇàµÈ °æ¿ì´Â ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ¹ß»ý½Ã±â´Â ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ È¯ÀÚ¿¡¼­(92.6%) Ä¡·á Á¾·á ÈÄ 2³â À̳»¿´´Ù(Áß¾Ó°ª 16°³¿ù).
´Üº¯·®ºÐ¼®¿¡¼­ À§ÇèÀÎÀÚ·Î icruCRBED (Á÷ÀåÀÌ ¹ÞÀº ÃÑ »ý¹°ÇÐÀû µ¿µî¼±·®), ÀÚ±ÃÁÖÀ§Á¶Á÷ÀÇ ¹æ»ç¼±·®, ¹× º´±â¿´´Ù. icruCRBED°¡ 100 ¹Ì¸¸ÀÎ °æ¿ì¿Í 100 ÀÌ»óÀÎ °æ¿ì 4.2% ´ë 19.7%, ÀÚ±ÃÁÖÀ§Á¶Á÷¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¶»ç¼±·® 55 §í ¹Ì¸¸°ú ±× ÀÌ»óÀÎ °æ¿ì°¡ 5.1% ´ë 22.1%,
º´±â ¥±
ÀÌÇÏÀÎ °æ¿ì¿Í ¥² ÀÌ»óÀÎ °æ¿ì°¡ 10.5% ´ë 31.8%¿´´Ù. ´Ùº¯·®ºÐ¼®¿¡¼­´Â icruCRBED ¸¸ÀÌ À¯ÀÇÇÏ¿´´Ù(p=0.0432). µî±Þ 1 ÃâÇ÷Àº ÀÚ¿¬ÀûÀ¸·Î ¼Ò½ÇµÇ°Å³ª(3¸í) 1~2°³¿ùÀÇ sucralfate °üÀåÀ¸·Î ¸ØÃß¾ú´Ù. µî±Þ 2ÀÇ È¯ÀÚ 6¸íÀº 1~2°³¿ù µ¿¾È sucralfate °üÀåÀ¸·Î ÃâÇ÷ÀÇ
ºóµµ¿Í
¾çÀÌ ÁÙ¾îµé¾ú°í ÀÌ Áß 4¸íÀº Àü±âÀÀ°í¼úÀ» Ãß°¡·Î ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ´Ù¸¥ 9¸íÀº Àü±âÀÀ°í¼úÀ» ¸ÕÀú ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù(4¸í; sucralfate °üÀå º´Çà). ¸ðµÎ 3~10°³¿ù ³»¿¡ Á¤ÁöµÇ¾ú´Ù. µî±Þ 3ÀÇ ÃâÇ÷Àº ÀæÀº Àü±âÀÀ°í¼ú°ú ¼öÇ÷À» ¿äÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á·Ð: º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­ Áߵ ÀÌ»óÀÇ Á÷ÀåÃâÇ÷ºóµµ°¡ 8.5%·Î Ÿ ¹®Çå¿¡¼­ º¸°íµÈ ºóµµ¿Í À¯»çÇÑ °á°ú¿´´Ù. Á÷Àå¿¡ Á¶»çµÈ ÃÑ »ý¹°ÇÐÀû µ¿µî¼±·®ÀÌ 100 §í ÀÌ»óÀÎ °æ¿ì¿¡ Á÷ÀåÃâÇ÷ÀÌ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô Áõ°¡ÇϹǷÎ, Ä¡·á°èȹ½Ã »ý¹°ÇÐÀû µ¿µî¼±·®À» °í·ÁÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ÈÞÀ¯Áõ
°¨¼Ò¿¡
µµ¿òÀÌ µÉ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÈ´Ù. Á÷ÀåÃâÇ÷ÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇÑ È¯ÀÚ¿¡¼­ Á¶±â¿¡ Àû±ØÀûÀ¸·Î Ä¡·á¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ÃâÇ÷·Î ÀÎÇÑ ºÒÆíÇÔÀ» ½Å¼ÓÇÏ°Ô ÇØ°áÇÏ°í ÀÌ·Î ÀÎÇÑ ½É¸®Àû ºÒ¾È°¨À» ÇؼÒÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç ³ª¾Æ°¡ »îÀÇ Áú Çâ»ó¿¡µµ µµ¿òÀ» ÁÙ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆǴܵȴÙ.

Purpose: Radiotherapy is the main treatment modality for uterine cervix cancer. Since the rectum is in the radiation target volume, rectal bleeding is a common late side effect. This study evaluates the risk factors of radiation induced
rectal
bleeding and discusses its optimal management.

Materials and Methods: A total of 213 patients who completed external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and intracavitary radiation (ICR) between September 1994 and December 1999 were included in this study. No patient had undergone concurrent
chemo-radiotherapy. Ninety patients received radiotherapy according to a modified hyperfractionated schedule. A midline block was placed at a pelvic dose of between 30.6 §í to 39.6 §í. The total parametrial dose from the EBRT was 51 to 59 §í
depending
on the extent of their disease. The point A dose from the HDR brachytherapy was 28 §í to 30 §í (4 §í¡¿7, or 5 §í¡¿6). The rectal point dose was calculated either by the ICRU 38 guideline, or by anterior rectal wall point seen on radiographs, with
barium
contrast. Rectal bleeding was scored by the LENT/SOMA criteria. For the management of rectal bleeding, we opted for observation, sucralfate enema or coagulation based on the frequency or amount of bleeding. The median follow-up period was 39
months
(12~86 months).

Results: The incidence of rectal bleeding was 12.7% (27/213); graded as 1 in 9 patients, grade 2 in 16 and grade 3 in 2. The overall moderate and severe rectal complication rate was 8.5%. Most complications (92.6%) developed within 2 years
following completion of radiotherapy (median 16 months). No patient progressed to rectal fistula or obstruction during the follow-up period. In the univariate analysis, three factors correlated with a high incidence of bleeding:an icruCRBED greater
than
100 §í (19.7% vs. 4.2%), an EBRT dose to the parametrium over 55 §í (22.1% vs. 5.1%) and higher stages of ¥² and ¥³ (31.8% vs. 10.5%). In the multivariate analysis, the icruCRBED was the only significant factor (p>0.0432). The total parametrial
dose
from the EBRT had borderline significance (p=0.0546). Grade 1 bleeding was controlled without further management (3 patients), or with sucralfate enema 1 to 2 months after treatment. For grade 2 bleeding, sucralfate enema for 1 to 2 months reduced
the
frequency or amount of bleeding but for residual bleeding, additional coagulation was performed, where immediate cessation of bleeding was achieved (symptom duration of 3 to 10 months). Grade 3 bleeding lasted for 1 year even with multiple
transfusions
and coagulations.

Conclusion: Moderate and severe rectal bleeding occurred in 8.5% of patients, which is comparable with other reports. The most significant risk factor for rectal bleeding was the accumulated dose to the rectum (icruCRBED), which corrected
with
consideration to biological equivalence. Prompt management of rectal bleeding, with a combination of sucralfate enema and coagulation, reduced the duration of the symptom, and minimized the anxiety/discomfort of patients.

Å°¿öµå

Á÷ÀåÃâÇ÷; ºÎÀÛ¿ë; ÀڱðæºÎ¾Ï; Ä¡·á; Rectal bleeding; Complication; Radiotherapy; Cervix cancer; Management;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS