Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

µÎ°³ ³» ´ÙÇü¼º¾Æ±³¸ð¼¼Æ÷Á¾ ȯÀÚÀÇ ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á °á°ú The Outcome of Glioblastoma Patients Treated with Surgery and Radiation Therapy

´ëÇѹæ»ç¼±Á¾¾çÇÐȸÁö 2004³â 22±Ç 2È£ p.91 ~ 97
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
³²Èñ¸²/Nam HR ÀÓµµÈÆ/¾È¿ëÂù/ÀÌÁ¤ÀÏ/³²µµÇö/±èÁ¾Çö/È«½Âö/ÀÌÁ¤Àº/°­¹Î±Ô/¹Ú¿µÁ¦/±è°æÁÖ/¹Ú ¿ø/Çã½ÂÀç

Abstract

¸ñ Àû: µÎ°³ ³» ´ÙÇü¼º¾Æ±³¸ð¼¼Æ÷Á¾ ȯÀÚÀÇ ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á ÈÄ »ýÁ¸À²À» Á¶»çÇÏ°í ±× ¿¹ÈÄ ÀÎÀÚÀÇ Á߿伺À» ¾Ë¾Æº¸°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

´ë»ó ¹× ¹æ¹ý: 1994³âºÎÅÍ 2003³â±îÁö »ï¼º¼­¿ïº´¿ø¿¡¼­ º´¸®ÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î ´ÙÇü¼º¾Æ±³¸ð¼¼Æ÷Á¾À¸·Î È®ÁøµÈ ȯÀÚ Áß ±ÙÄ¡Àû ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÑ 120¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ³²ÀÚ´Â 64¸í(53%), ¿©ÀÚ´Â 56¸í(47%)À̾úÀ¸¸ç, 20·Ê(17%)ÀÇ Á¾¾çÀº ´Ù¹ß¼ºÀ̾ú´Ù. ¼ö¼úÀº À°¾ÈÀû ¿ÏÀü ÀýÁ¦, ºÎºÐ ÀýÁ¦ ¹× Á¶Á÷°Ë»ç¸¦ °¢°¢ 22·Ê(18%), 69·Ê(58%), 29·Ê(24%)¿¡¼­ ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´°í, ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á´Â 4¢¦10 MV ¼±Çü°¡¼Ó±â¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© 54¢¦72 Gy (Áß¾Ó°ª 60 Gy)¸¦ Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù. ´ë»ó ȯÀÚÀÇ ÃßÀû°üÂû±â°£Àº 2°³¿ù¿¡¼­ 62°³¿ù(Áß¾Ó°ª 12°³¿ù)À̾ú´Ù.

°á °ú: Àüü ȯÀÚ±ºÀÇ 1³â ¹× 2³â »ýÁ¸À²Àº 52%¿Í 14%À̾úÀ¸¸ç, Áß¾Ó»ýÁ¸±â°£Àº 13°³¿ùÀ̾ú´Ù. ¿¹ÈÄ ÀÎÀÚ¿¡ µû¸¥ 1³â »ýÁ¸À²Àº 50¼¼ ¹Ì¸¸Àº 64%, 50¼¼ ÀÌ»óÀº 41% (p£¼0.01), ¼ö¼ú Àü È°µ¿µµ°¡ ECOG 0 ȤÀº 1ÀÎ °æ¿ì´Â 57%, 2 ÀÌ»óÀº 44% (p=0.03)¿´´Ù. µÎ°³ ³» º´º¯ ¼ö¿¡ µû¸¥ 1³â »ýÁ¸À²Àº ´ÜÀϺ´º¯Àº 57%, ´Ù¹ß¼º º´º¯Àº 23% (p=0.02)À̾úÀ¸¸ç, ÀýÁ¦Á¤µµ¿¡ µû¸¥ »ýÁ¸À²Àº À°¾ÈÀû ¿ÏÀü ÀýÁ¦, ºÎºÐ ÀýÁ¦, Á¶Á÷°Ë»ç¸¸ ½ÃÇàÇÑ °æ¿ì¿¡ °¢°¢ 67%, 48%, 47% (p=0.04)¿´´Ù. ´Ùº¯·® ºÐ¼®¿¡ µû¸¥ ¿¹ÈÄÀÎÀڷδ ¿©ÀÚ(p£¼0.01), 50¼¼ ¹Ì¸¸(p£¼0.01), È°µ¿µµ°¡ ECOG 0 ȤÀº 1 (p=0.05), À°¾ÈÀû ¿ÏÀüÀýÁ¦(p=0.05)°¡ ÁÁÀº ¿¹ÈÄ ÀÎÀÚÀ̾ú´Ù.

°á ·Ð: ±ÙÄ¡Àû ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÑ µÎ°³ ³» ´ÙÇü¼º¾Æ±³¸ð¼¼Æ÷Á¾ ȯÀÚÀÇ Áß¾Ó»ýÁ¸±â°£Àº 13°³¿ù·Î ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ¹®Ç庸°í¿Í ºñ½ÁÇÑ ¼öÁØÀ̾ú´Ù. Ä¡·á¼ºÀûÀÇ Çâ»óÀ» À§ÇÏ¿© ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á ±â¼úÀÇ Àû¿ëÀ» ÅëÇÑ ¹æ»ç¼±·®ÀÇ Áõ°¡¿Í È¿°úÀûÀÎ Ç×¾ÏÈ­Çпä¹ý ¾àÁ¦ÀÇ °³¹ß ¹× »ç¿ë µîÀÇ ¿¬±¸°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ°í, ȯÀÚÀÇ ¿¹ÈÄÀÎÀÚ¿¡ µû¶ó °³º°È­µÈ Ä¡·á¹æ¹ýÀÌ Àû¿ëµÇ¾î¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆǴܵȴÙ.

Purpose: To analyze the survival outcomes and prognostic factors in glioblastoma patients treated with surgery and radiation therapy.
Materials and Methods: One hundred twenty glioblastoma patients treated with postoperative radiation therapy from 1994 to 2003 at Samsung Medical Center were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical extents were gross total resection in 22 patients (18%), subtotal resection in 69 (58%), and biopsy only in 29 (24%). The median radiation dose was 60 Gy, ranging from 45 Gy to 72 Gy. The median follow-up period was 12 months ranging from 2 to 62 months.

Results: The overall 1- and 2-year survival rates were 52% and 14%, respectively, and the median survival duration was 13 months. Favorable prognostic factors by Uunivariate analyses of prognostic factors on 1-year survival rate wererevealed that age under 50 (p£¼0.01), ECOG performance status 0 or 1 (p=0.03), single lesion (p=0.02), and gross total resection (p=0.04), were the favorable prognostic factors. and by Mmultivariate analyses wererevealed that female (p£¼0.01), age under 50 (p£¼0.01), ECOG performance status 0 or 1 (p=0.05) and gross total resection (p=0.05) were the favorable prognostic factors.

Conclusions: The results of our study were comparable with those previously reported. To improve treatment outcome, various modifications, including radiation dose escalation through newer radiation therapy techniques and use of effective chemotherapy regimen, should be further investigated. investigated. Also Furthermore, the application of individualized treatment strategy based on the patient¢¥s¢¥ prognostic factors might be needed.

Å°¿öµå

´ÙÇü¼º¾Æ±³¸ð¼¼Æ÷Á¾;¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á;Glioblastoma multiforme;Radiation therapy

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS