Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀڱðæºÎ¾ÏÀÇ 3D-CRT¿Í IMRT ½Ã ¼ÒÀåÀüÀ§ÀåÄ¡ÀÇ ¼ÒÀå ¼±·®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿µÇâ Small Bowel Sparing Effect of Small Bowel Displacement System in 3D-CRT and IMRT for Cervix Cancer

´ëÇѹæ»ç¼±Á¾¾çÇÐȸÁö 2004³â 22±Ç 2È£ p.130 ~ 137
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
°­¹Î±Ô/Kang MK Çã½ÂÀç/ÇÑ¿µÀÌ/¹Ú¿ø/ÁÖ»ó±Ô/±è°æÁÖ/ÀÌÁ¤Àº/¹Ú¿µÁ¦/³²Èñ¸²/ÀÓµµÈÆ/¾È¿ëÂù

Abstract

¸ñ Àû: ÀڱðæºÎ¾ÏÀÇ ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á ½Ã 3Â÷¿øÀÔüÁ¶Çü¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á(3D-CRT)¿Í ¼¼±âÁ¶Àý¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á(IMRT)´Â ¼ÒÀåÀÇ ¹æ»ç¼± Á¶»ç¼±·®À» °¨¼Ò½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ¼ÒÀåÀüÀ§ÀåÄ¡(SBDS)´Â °ñ¹Ý°­ ³»ÀÇ ¼ÒÀå ¿ëÀûÀ» °¨¼Ò½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù°í ¾Ë·ÁÁ® ÀÖ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â SBDS¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÑ 3D-CRT¿Í IMRT °èȹÀ» SBDS¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀº °èȹ°ú ºñ±³ÇÏ¿©, SBDSÀÇ ¼ÒÀå Á¶»ç¼±·®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿µÇâÀ» Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

´ë»ó ¹× ¹æ¹ý: ÀڱðæºÎ¾ÏÀ¸·Î ±ÙÄ¡Àû ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á¸¦ ¹ÞÀº 10¸íÀÇ È¯ÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù. °¢ ȯÀÚ¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ½ºÆ¼·ÎÆû ¾Ð¹Ú±â±¸¿Í ȯÀÚ¿¡°Ô °³º°ÀûÀ¸·Î Á¦À۵Ǵ °íÁ¤±â±¸·Î ±¸¼ºµÈ SBDS¸¦ Á¦ÀÛÇÏ¿´°í, SBDS°¡ ÀÖ´Â »óÅÂ¿Í ¾ø´Â »óÅ·Πº¹¿ÍÀ§¿¡¼­ Àü»êÈ­´ÜÃþÃÔ¿µ(CT)À» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. 3D-CRT´Â 4-field box techniqueÀ», IMRT´Â 15 MV X-¼± 7 Á¶»ç¹®À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© °èȹÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ȸÀüÁß½ÉÁ¡¿¡ 50 Gy (25ȸ ºÐÇÒ)¸¦ ó¹æÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºñ±³ ºÐ¼®Àº SBDSÀÇ »ç¿ë¿¡ µû¸¥ ¼ÒÀå ¿ëÀûÀÇ º¯È­¿Í ³× °¡Áö °èȹÀÇ ¼ÒÀåÀÇ ¼±·®Ã¼ÀûÈ÷½ºÅä±×¶÷ÀÇ Â÷À̸¦ 10 Gy ´ÜÀ§·Î paired t-test¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á °ú: ¼ÒÀåÀÇ ¿ëÀûÀº SBDS¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´À» ¶§ Æò±Õ 522 cm3¿¡¼­ 262 cm3·Î 49.8% °¨¼ÒµÇ¾ú´Ù. 10 GyºÎÅÍ 50 Gy±îÁö 10 Gy °£°ÝÀ¸·Î ÀÏÁ¤ÇÑ Á¶»ç¼±·®À» ¹Þ´Â ¼ÒÀåÀÇ ¿ëÀûÀº SBDS¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´À» ¶§ 3D-CRT¿¡¼­ 65¢¦80%, IMRT¿¡¼­ 54¢¦67% °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù. 3D-CRT¿Í IMRT¸¦ ¼­·Î ºñ±³Çϸé, 20 GyºÎÅÍ 50 Gy±îÁö 10 Gy °£°ÝÀ¸·Î ÀÏÁ¤ÇÑ Á¶»ç¼±·®À» ¹Þ´Â ¼ÒÀå ¿ëÀûÀº SBDS¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀº °æ¿ì¿¡´Â IMRT°¡ 6¢¦7% Á¤µµ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô Àû¾úÀ¸³ª SBDS¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÑ °æ¿ì¿¡´Â 1% À̳»·Î Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù.

°á ·Ð: 3D-CRT¿Í IMRT¿¡¼­ SBDS¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¶§ ¼ÒÀåÀÇ Á¶»ç¼±·®À» ´õ °¨¼Ò½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¹Ç·Î, SBDS¸¦ Ä¡·á¿¡ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¸é ¼ÒÀåÀÇ ºÎÀÛ¿ëÀ» ´õ °¨¼Ò½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù.

Purpose: In radiotherapy for cervix cancer, both 3-dimensioal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) could reduce the dose to the small bowel (SB), while the small bowel displacement system (SBDS) could reduce the SB volume in the pelvic cavity. To evaluate the effect of the SBDS on the dose to the SB in 3D-CRT and IMRT plans, 3D-CRT and IMRT plans, with or without SBDS, were compared.

Materials and Methods: Ten consecutive uterine cervix cancer patients, receiving curative radiotherapy, were accrued. Ten pairs of computerized tomography (CT) scans were obtained in the prone position, with or without SBDS, which consisted of a Styrofoam compression device and an individualized custom-made abdominal immobilization device. Both 3D-CRT, using the 4-field box technique, and IMRT plans, with 7 portals of 15 MV X-ray, were generated for each CT image, and prescribed 50 Gy (25 fractions) to the isocenter. For the SB, the volume change due to the SBDS and the DVHs of the four different plans were analyzed using paired t-tests.

Results: The SBDS significantly reduced the mean SB volume from 522 to 262 cm3 (49.8% reduction). The SB volumes that received a dose of 10¢¦50 Gy were significantly reduced in 3D-CRT (65¢¦80% reduction) and IMRT plans (54¢¦67% reduction) using the SBDS. When the SB volumes that received 20¢¦50 Gy were compared between the 3D-CRT and IMRT plans, those of the IMRT without the SBDS were significantly less, by 6¢¦7%, than those for the 3D-CRT without the SBDS, but the volume difference was less than 1% when using the SBDS.

Conclusion: The SBDS reduced the radiation dose to the SB in both the 3D-CRT and IMRT plans, so could reduce the radiation injury of the SB.

Å°¿öµå

ÀڱðæºÎ¾Ï;3Â÷¿ø ÀÔüÁ¶Çü¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á;¼¼±âº¯Á¶¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á;¼ÒÀåÀüÀ§ÀåÄ¡;Cervix cancer;3-Dimensional conformal radiotherapy;Intensity-modulated radiation therapy;Small bowel displacement system

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS