Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±Þ¼º °ñ¼ö¼º ¹éÇ÷º´¿¡¼­ AML1/ETO À¶ÇÕÀ¯ÀüÀÚ¿Í ¿¹ÈÄ Prognostic value of AML1/ETO fusion transcripts in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia

´ëÇѳ»°úÇÐȸÁö 2001³â 61±Ç 6È£ p.650 ~ 659
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Á¶Àº°æ/Eun Kyung Cho Á¤Àº°æ/¾ÈÁ¤·Ä/ÀÓµµÀ±/°æ¼±¿µ/ÁÖ±âŹ/¹æ¼ö¹Ì/¼­ÀÏÇý/½Åµ¿º¹/ÀÌÀçÈÆ/Eun Kyung Jung/Jeong Yeal Ahn/Do Yoon Lim/Sun Young Kyung/Ki Tak Ju/Soo-Mee Bang/Yiel Hea Seo/Dong Bok Shin/Jae Hoon Lee

Abstract

¸ñÀû: ±Þ¼º °ñ¼ö¼º ¹éÇ÷º´¿¡¼­ t(8;21) (q22;q22)Àº ºÐÀÚÀ¯ÀüÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î AML1/ETO À¶ÇÕÀ¯ÀüÀÚ¸¦ ¸¸µé¾î³»´Âµ¥ ÁÁÀº ¿¹ÈÄÀÎÀÚ·Î ¾Ë·ÁÁ® ÀÖÀ¸¸ç ÀþÀº ¿¬·ÉÃþ¿¡ È£¹ßÇÏ°í ÇüÅÂÇÐÀû, ¸é¿ªÇÐÀû Ư¡À» °¡Áö°í ÀÖ°í cytosine arabinoside¿¡ ÁÁÀº ¹ÝÀÀÀ» º¸ÀδÙ.
ÀúÀÚµéÀº
±Þ¼º °ñ¼ö¼º ¹éÇ÷º´, ƯÈ÷ M2¿¡¼­ AML1/ETO À¶ÇÕÀ¯ÀüÀÚÀÇ ºóµµ¿Í ÀÌ¿¡ µû¸¥ ÇüÅÂÇÐÀû, ¸é¿ªÇÐÀû, ÀÓ»óÀû ¾ç»óÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ ¹× ¿¹ÈÄ¿ÍÀÇ °ü°è¸¦ ¾Ë¾Æº¸°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¹æ¹ý: 1995³â 5¿ùºÎÅÍ 2000³â 9¿ù±îÁö °¡ÃµÀÇ´ë ºÎ¼Ó ±æº´¿ø¿¡¼­ ±Þ¼º °ñ¼ö¼º ¹éÇ÷º´À¸·Î Áø´ÜµÈ
ȯÀÚ Áß
M3¸¦ Á¦¿ÜÇÑ È¯ÀÚ¿¡¼­ AML1/ETO À¯ÀüÀÚ Àç¹è¿­¿¡ ´ëÇÑ RT-PCRÀ» ½Ç½ÃÇÏ°í ¿°»öü °Ë»ç¿Í ÇüÅÂÇÐÀû, ¸é¿ªÇÐÀû, ÀÓ»óÀû ÀÚ·á¿Í Ư¡À» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ°í Åë°èºÐ¼®À» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. °á°ú: M3¸¦ Á¦¿ÜÇÑ ±Þ¼º °ñ¼ö¼º ¹éÇ÷º´ 59¸íÀÇ AML1/ETO À¯ÀüÀÚ Àç¹è¿­Àº 22.0%¿¡¼­
°ËÃâµÇ¾ú°í
t (8;21) (q22;q22)ÀÇ ¹ßÇö·üÀº 27.8% (10/36)¿´´Ù. AML1/ETO ¾ç¼º±º°ú À½¼º±ºÀÇ ºñ±³¿¡¼­ ¿¬·É, ¼ºº°, ¹éÇ÷±¸ ¼ö, Ç÷»ö¼Ò ¼ö, Ç÷¼ÒÆÇ ¼ö µî¿¡¼­´Â Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾úÀ¸³ª ¸é¿ªÇÐÀû °Ë»ç¿¡¼­ HLA-DR¹ßÇöÀÌ ¾ç¼º±º¿¡¼­ ³ôÀº °æÇâÀÌ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù (p=0.06). Ç×¾ÏÈ­Çпä¹ý ÈÄ
¿ÏÀü°üÇØÀ²°ú
¹«º´»ýÁ¸±â°£Àº µÎ ±º¿¡¼­ ÀǹÌÀÖ´Â Â÷ÀÌ´Â ¾ø¾ú°í, Àüü»ýÁ¸±â°£ (Áß¾Ó°ª 82.2ÁÖ:34.4ÁÖ, p=0.02)°ú ¹«ÁøÇà »ýÁ¸±â°£ (Áß¾Ó°ª 50.9ÁÖ:20.4ÁÖ, p=0.02)Àº ¾ç¼º±º¿¡¼­ ÀǹÌÀÖ°Ô ´õ ³ô¾Ò´Ù. ±Þ¼º °ñ¼ö¼º ¹éÇ÷º´ M2ȯÀÚ´Â 29¸íÀ¸·Î AML1/ETO À¯ÀüÀÚ Àç¹è¿­Àº 44.8%¿¡¼­
°ËÃâµÇ¾ú°í t (8;21) (q22;q22)ÀÇ ¹ßÇö·üÀº 50.0% (10/20)¿´´Ù. AML1/ETO À¯ÀüÀÚ Àç¹è¿­ ¾ç¼º±º°ú À½¼º±ºÀÇ ºñ±³¿¡¼­ ¿¬·É, ¼ºº°, ¹éÇ÷±¸ ¼ö, Ç÷»ö¼Ò ¼ö, Ç÷¼ÒÆÇ ¼ö µî¿¡¼­´Â Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú°í ¸é¿ªÇÐÀû °Ë»ç¿¡¼­µµ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ÇüÅÂÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î ¾ç¼º±º¿¡¼­ Auer rod°¡
¸¹ÀÌ
°üÂûµÇ°í °ñÁö°¡ ¶Ñ·ÇÇÏ¸ç ¼¼Æ÷°¡ Å©°í °ú¸³±¸¸¦ ´Ù·® Æ÷ÇÔÇÏ´Â µî Ư¡ÀûÀÎ ¼Ò°ßÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. Ç×¾ÏÈ­Çпä¹ý ÈÄ ¿ÏÀü°üÇØÀ²°ú ¹«º´»ýÁ¸±â°£Àº µÎ±º¿¡¼­ ÀǹÌÀÖ´Â Â÷ÀÌ´Â ¾ø¾ú°í Àüü»ýÁ¸±â°£ (Áß¾Ó°ª 50.9ÁÖ:16.0ÁÖ, p=0.09)Àº ¾ç¼º±º¿¡¼­ ³ôÀº °æÇâÀÌ ÀÖ¾úÀ¸³ª
Åë°èÀû
Àǹ̴ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. °á·Ð: ±Þ¼º °ñ¼ö¼º ¹éÇ÷º´¿¡¼­ AML1/ETO À¯ÀüÀÚ Àç¹è¿­Àº ÈçÈ÷ ¹ß°ßµÇ¸ç, ƯÈ÷ M2¿¡¼­ ³ô´Ù. ¾ç¼º±º¿¡¼­ Ư¡ÀûÀÎ ÇüÅÂÇÐÀû ¼Ò°ßÀ» º¸ÀÌ°í, Àüü »ýÁ¸À²°ú ¹«ÁøÇà»ýÁ¸À²ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â µî ÁÁÀº ¿¹Èĸ¦ º¸¿© ±Þ¼º °ñ¼ö¼º ¹éÇ÷º´ÀÇ ¾ÆÇüÀ»
°áÁ¤Çϴµ¥
±âº»ÀûÀ¸·Î »ç¿ëµÉ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ú´Ù. ÇâÈÄ ¹Ì¼¼ÀÜ·ùº´ÀÇ ÃßÀû°üÂûÀ̳ª Àç¹ßÀÇ Á¶±â¹ß°ßÀ» À§ÇØ ´õ ¸¹Àº ȯÀÚµéÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÈÄ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ËÁõÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ°Ú´Ù.

Background: The t (8;21) (q22;q22), which produces the fusion gene AML1/ETO, is associated with relatively good prognosis and, in particular, with a good response to cytosine arabinoside. Analysis of t (8;21) positive leukemic blasts has
shown
characteristic morphological and immunological features. We performed this study to investigate the incidence of AML1/ETO rearrangement in adult AML, especially in M2 subtype, to make a comparison of morphologic, immunophenotypic and clinical
characteristics between AML1/ETO rearrangement positive and negative group in patient with AML and to analyze the correlation with other biological parameters. Methods: From May 1995 to Sep. 2000, fifty-nine patients with AML including
twenty-nine AML-M2 were studied. RNAs were extracted from leukemic cells and reverse transcriptase mediated polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for AML1/ETO fusion transcript was done. Chromosome study, immunophenotypic, and clinical
characteristics
were
analysed and statistical analysis was done. Results: The male to female ratio was 32:27 in AML and 17:12 in AML-M2. The median age was 43 years (range 14-86) in AML and 43 years (range 14-77) in AML-M2. The incidence of AML1/ETO fusion
transcripts was 22.0% in AML and 44.8% in AML-M2. The morphologic finding of bone marrow in AML-M2 showed higher incidence of Auer rods, large blast with prominent golgi and abnormal granules in AML1/ETO positive parients. There was no
significant
difference of immunophenotype. AML patients with AML1/ETO rearrangement had a tendency of higher complete remission rate (81.8% vs 56.6%, p=0.13). The overall survival (median 82.2 weeks vs 34.4 weeks, p=0.02) and progression free survival
(median
50.9
weeks vs 20.4 weeks, p=0.02) of AML1/ETO positive group were longer than those of negative group in AML. AML-M2 patients with AML1/ETO rerrangement had also a tendency of longer overall survival and progression free survival, although there was
no
significant difference between both group (median OS 82.4 weeks vs 15.6 weeks, p=0.07, median PFS 50.9 weeks vs 16.0 weeks, p=0.09). Conclusion: Our data suggest that AML1/ETO rerrangement is detected frequently in AML, especially M2, and
is
a
favorable prognostic factor. Thus, molecular diagnostic approaches should be used routinely to identify patients with this genetic subtype of AML.

Å°¿öµå

t (8;21); AML1/ETO; PCR; Morphology; Prognosis;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS