Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

³»½Ã°æ À¯µÎ°ý¾à±Ù Àý°³¼ú°ú Å« dz¼± À¯µÎ È®Àå¼úÀ» º´ÇàÇÑ ´ã°ü°á¼®ÀÇ Ä¡·á Combined endoscopic sphincterotomy and large balloon sphincteroplasty for bile duct stones

´ëÇѳ»°úÇÐȸÁö 2007³â 73±Ç 5È£ p.474 ~ 480
±è¹Î°æ, ±è¸íȯ, ÀÌÅÂÀ±, ¿ÀÇüö, ±Ç½ÂÇö, ÇÑÁ¤Çý, ÃÖÇü¿À, ¹Ú¼öÁ¤, ±èÅÂÇù, ÀÌ»ó¼ö, ¼­µ¿¿Ï, À̼º±¸,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è¹Î°æ ( Kim Min-Kyoung ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø Ç÷¾×Á¾¾ç³»°ú

±è¸íȯ ( Kim Myung-Hwan ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ¼ÒÈ­±â³»°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌÅÂÀ± ( Lee Tae-Yoon ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ³»°úÇб³½Ç
¿ÀÇüö ( Oh Hyoung-Chul ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ³»°úÇб³½Ç
±Ç½ÂÇö ( Kwon Seung-Hyun ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ³»°úÇб³½Ç
ÇÑÁ¤Çý ( Han Jung-Hye ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø È£Èí±â³»°ú
ÃÖÇü¿À ( Choi Hyung-Oh ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ³»°úÇб³½Ç
¹Ú¼öÁ¤ ( Park Soo-Jung ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø È£Èí±â³»°ú
±èÅÂÇù ( Kim Tae-Hyup ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ³»°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌ»ó¼ö ( Lee Sang-Soo ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ³»°úÇб³½Ç
¼­µ¿¿Ï ( Seo Dong-Wan ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ³»°ú
À̼º±¸ ( Lee Sung-Koo ) 
¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ³»°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract


Background : The combined use of small endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) followed by endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) might be associated with a lower incidence of procedure-related complications such as pancreatitis, bleeding or perforation, compared to the use of EPLBD or a large EST alone. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the utility of a combined EST and EPLBD method for the removal of common bile duct (CBD) stones that could not be extracted by use of an EST and conventional techniques.

Methods : Between March 2005 and September 2006, a total of 35 patients with CBD stones were enrolled. Fourteen patients had received a previous EST, and 21 patients underwent an EST. The sphincterotomy site was then dilated with a 12~18 mm diameter balloon.

Results : The average number of stones was 3.6+/-2.9 (range: 110). The average maximum stone diameter was 26.11+/-8.88 mm (range: 12~50 mm). Complete stone removal was accomplished in 31 patients (88.6%). In 9 patients (25.7%), a mechanical lithotripsy was required. No episode of true pancreatitis occurred. A procedure-related perforation occurred in one patient (2.8%) and the patient was treated with NPO and antibiotics. No procedure-related bleeding or mortality was observed. The procedure was performed safely in 9 patients (25.7%) with a periampullary diverticulum and in 14 patients (40.0%) with a previous EST.

Conclusion : Combined EST and EPLBD may be a safe and effective method, and may be a good alternative treatment for removing CBD stones that cannot be extracted by an EST and conventional techniques. However, prospective studies based on a large number of patients are needed.

Å°¿öµå

Endoscopic sphincterotomy; Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation; Common bile duct stone

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS