Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

´ç´¢º´ÀÌ ¾ø´Â Çѱ¹ ¼ºÀο¡¼­ Àν¶¸° ÀúÇ×¼ºÀÇ ÀÓ»óÁöÇ¥ Best surrogate marker for insulin resistance in middle aged non-diabetic Korean ; Chungju metabolic syndrome study

´ëÇѳ»°úÇÐȸÁö 2007³â 73±Ç 6È£ p.611 ~ 617
±èÁöÇö, ±ÇÇõ»ó, ¹Ú¿ë¹®, ÀÓ¼±¿µ, ÀÌÁøÈñ, À̽Âȯ, ÀÓµ¿ÁØ, È«¼øÈ­, Á¶ÀçÇü, ±è¼º·¡, ±èµ¿¼®, À±°ÇÈ£, ÀÌ¿øö, Â÷ºÀ¿¬, À̱¤¿ì, °­¼º±¸, ¼ÕÈ£¿µ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÁöÇö ( Kim Ji-Hyun ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç

±ÇÇõ»ó ( Kwon Hyeok-Sang ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç
¹Ú¿ë¹® ( Park Yong-Moon ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿¹¹æÀÇÇб³½Ç
ÀÓ¼±¿µ ( Lim Sun-Young ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿¹¹æÀÇÇб³½Ç
ÀÌÁøÈñ ( Lee Jin-Hee ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿¹¹æÀÇÇб³½Ç
À̽Âȯ ( Lee Seung-Hwan ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÓµ¿ÁØ ( Lim Dong-Jun ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç
È«¼øÈ­ ( Hong Sun-Hwa ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç
Á¶ÀçÇü ( Cho Jae-Hyoung ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç
±è¼º·¡ ( Kim Sung-Rae ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç
±èµ¿¼® ( Kim Dong-Suk ) 
ÃæÁֽú¸°Ç¼Ò
À±°ÇÈ£ ( Yoon Kun-Ho ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌ¿øö ( Lee Won-Chul ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿¹¹æÀÇÇб³½Ç
Â÷ºÀ¿¬ ( Cha Bong-Yun ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç
À̱¤¿ì ( Lee Kwang-Woo ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç
°­¼º±¸ ( Kang Sung-Koo ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç
¼ÕÈ£¿µ ( Son Ho-Young ) 
°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

¸ñÀû : ´ç´¢º´À» °¡ÁöÁö ¾ÊÀº Çѱ¹ ¼ºÀο¡¼­ Àν¶¸° ÀúÇ×¼ºÀ» °¡Àå Àß ³ªÅ¸³¾ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ´ÜÀÏ ÁöÇ¥°¡ ¹«¾ùÀÎÁö¸¦ ¾Ë¾Æº¸°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

¹æ¹ý : ÃæÁÖÁö¿ª¿¡ °ÅÁÖÇÏ´Â 40¼¼ ÀÌ»ó Àα¸ ÃÑ 6,149 ¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î °¢Á¾ ½Åü°èÃøÁöÇ¥ ¹× ´ë»çÁöÇ¥ Áß¿¡¼­ Àν¶¸° ÀúÇ×¼ºÁöÇ¥(HOMA-IR)ÀÇ »óÀ§»çºÐÀ§¼ö¿¡ ÇØ´çÇÏ´Â Áý´ÜÀ» ¡°Àν¶¸°ÀúÇ×¼º±º¡±À¸·Î Á¤ÀÇÇÒ ¶§ À̸¦ °¡Àå Àß ¹Ý¿µÇÏ´Â ÁöÇ¥¸¦ ºÐ¼®Çϱâ À§ÇØ ´Ü¼øȸ±ÍºÐ¼®°ú ´ÙÁßȸ ±ÍºÐ¼® ¹æ¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© °¢°¢ ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú : ÀÏ»óÀûÀ¸·Î ºñ±³Àû ½±°Ô ÃøÁ¤ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ½Åü°è ÃøÁöÇ¥ÀΠüÁú·®Áö¼ö, Ç㸮µÑ·¹, Ç㸮µÑ·¹-µÐºÎµÑ·¹ºñ, Ç㸮µÑ·¹-½ÅÀåºñ¿Í ´ë»çÁöÇ¥ÀÎ ÃÑ ÄÝ·¹½ºÅ×·Ñ/HDL ÄÝ·¹ ½ºÅ׷Ѻñ(TC/HDL), non-HDL ÄÝ·¹½ºÅ×·Ñ, Áß¼ºÁö¹æ/°í¹Ðµµ ·¹½ºÅ׷Ѻñ(TG/HDL ratio), Áß¼ºÁö¹æ(TG) Áß¿¡¼­ üÁú·®Áö¼ö°¡ ¸ðµç ÁöÇ¥¸¦ ÅëƲ¾î Àν¶¸°ÀúÇ×¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Áø´ÜÀû °¡Ä¡°¡ °¡Àå ¿ì¼öÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. üÁú·®Áö¼öÀÇ cut off value´Â ³², ¿© °øÈ÷ 24 kg/m2À̾ú´Ù.

°á·Ð : ´ç´¢º´ÀÌ ¾ø´Â Çѱ¹ ¼ºÀο¡¼­ Àν¶¸°ÀúÇ×¼ºÀ» °¡Àå Àß ¹Ý¿µÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ´ÜÀÏÁöÇ¥´Â üÁú·®Áö¼ö¿´°í, 24
kg/m2 ÀÌ»óÀÏ °æ¿ì Àν¶¸°ÀúÇ×¼ºÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù°í ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ú´Ù.

Background : To investigate the best surrogate marker for insulin resistance in the non-diabetic middle-aged population in Korea.

Methods : This study was performed from February to April 2003-2005 in adults over 40 years of age living in Chungju City, South Korea, selected by stratified random cluster sampling. We analyzed the data from a total 6,149 non-diabetic subjects that completed a survey consisting of anthropometric measurement and blood chemistry. We defined the highest quartile of the homeostasis model for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) as the insulin resistant group in our study population.We also analyzed the correlation of various anthropometric (body mass index, waist circumference, waist to hip ratio, waist to height ratio) and biochemical parameters (total cholesterol to HDL cholesterol ratio, non-HDL cholesterol level, triglycerides to HDL cholesterol ratio and level of triglycerides) with insulin resistance using simple and multiple regression analysis for detecting the insulin resistance group.

Results : By simple regression analysis, among the anthropometric parameters including the body mass index, waist circumference, waist to hip ratio, waist to height ratio, and the biochemical parameters, including the total cholesterol to HDL cholesterol ratio, non-HDL cholesterol level, triglyceride to HDL cholesterol ratio and triglycerides level, the body mass index was the best surrogate marker for insulin resistance (95% CI 1.215-1.262). The cut-off value of the body mass index was 24.6 kg/m2 (male; 24.7, female; 24.6 kg/m2), with a sensitivity of 62.6% and specificity of 66.9%. Multiple logistic regression analysis for insulin resistance also gave the same results. Furthermore, the cut-off value of the body mass index for the metabolic syndrome as defined by NCEP-ATP III was also 24.1 kg/m2 (male; 24.0, female; 24.2 kg/m2).

Conclusions : Our study results suggest that the body mass index was the best surrogate marker for insulin resistance of a non-diabetic population and its cut-off value was approximately 24 kg/m2

Å°¿öµå

Àν¶¸° ÀúÇ×¼º;´ë»ç ÁõÈıº
Insulin resistance;Metabolic syndrome

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS