Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¸ÞŸºÐ¼®ÀÇ ¸í°ú ¾Ï Strengths and Limitations of Meta-Analysis

´ëÇѳ»°úÇÐȸÁö 2019³â 94±Ç 5È£ p.391 ~ 395
ÀÌ¿µÈ£,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌ¿µÈ£ ( Lee Young-Ho ) 
°í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract


Meta-analysis is a statistical method that combines and synthesizes multiple studies and integrates their results. Meta-analysis increases the sample size, and in turn, the power to study the effects of interest by combining primary studies and providing a precise estimate of the effects. Data synthesized from meta-analyses are usually more beneficial than the results of narrative reviews. In a meta-analysis, the decisions are transparent, and statistical analysis yields an objective measure of the integrated quantitative evidence. The biases of narrative reviews can be limited or overcome by conducting a meta-analysis. The systematic approach and transparency in meta-analysis help to resolve conflicts and uncertainties between studies, while leading to significant conclusions. However, this method is controversial and may not always be the best tool. Moreover, meta-analysis has several shortcomings, and in some cases, it may not be appropriate. Although meta-analysis has been criticized due to its limitations, there are solutions to such problems. The aim of this review is to describe and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis

Å°¿öµå

¸ÞŸºÐ¼®; ÀÚ·áºÐ¼®; Æí°ß
Meta-analysis; Data analysis; Bias

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS