Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÁßÁõ ³ú ÁöÁÖ¸·ÇÏ ÃâÇ÷ ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ¼ö¼úÀü ³ú½Ç ¿ÜºÎ ¹è¾×¼úÀÇ À¯¿ë¼º Effectiveness of Preoperative Extra-Ventricular Drainage in Poor Grade Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

´ëÇѳúÇ÷°üÇÐȸÁö 2002³â 4±Ç 1È£ p.52 ~ 57
Á¤Á¾¿ì, Á¶°æ±â, ½Å¿ë»ï, Á¶±âÈ«, À±¼öÇÑ, ±èÇõÁØ, Á¤¿µ¼±,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Á¤Á¾¿ì ( Cheong Jong-Woo ) 
¾ÆÁÖ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ½Å°æ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

Á¶°æ±â ( Cho Kyung-Gi ) 
¾ÆÁÖ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ½Å°æ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
½Å¿ë»ï ( Shin Yong-Sam ) 
¾ÆÁÖ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ½Å°æ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
Á¶±âÈ« ( Cho Ki-Hong ) 
¾ÆÁÖ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ½Å°æ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
À±¼öÇÑ ( Yoon Soo-Han ) 
¾ÆÁÖ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ½Å°æ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
±èÇõÁØ ( Kim Hyuk-Joon ) 
¾ÆÁÖ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ½Å°æ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
Á¤¿µ¼± ( Chung Young-Sun ) 
¾ÆÁÖ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ½Å°æ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract


Objective£ºPreoperative extra-ventricular drainage in poor grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients has been known to improve patient¡¯s clinical grade. However, the risk of rebleeding due to increase of transmural pressure hinders its popular clinical use. The authors present new experience of preoperative extra-ventricular drainage in poor grade aneurysmal SAH.

Materials and Methods£ºFrom January 1996 to November 2001, 56 SAH patients underwent extra-ventricular drainage preoperatively. The mean age was 57.9 years (range 27 to 88). Hunt and Hess grade (HH grade) on the time of extra-ventricular drainage insertion were grade 3 in 4 patients, grade 4 in 35 patients and grade 5 in 17 patients. The overall clinical outcome of the patients who underwent extra-ventricular drainage and final clinical outcome according to the intervals between ventricular drainage and direct clipping/endovascular coiling were analysed retrospectively.

Result£ºTwenty-six patients (46.4%) improved clinically (average HH grade was improved from 4.6 to 3.3), 25 patients (44.6%) have not been changed, 5 patients (9%) aggravated (4 to 5) after ventricular drainage. Seven of 30 unchanged or aggravated patients underwent CT scan which revealed rebleeding of the aneurysm. 32 patients (57.1%) were treated with surgery or endovascular coiling. Seventeen patients (30.4%) have lost their opportunity of ultimate treatment because they had poor clinical course after extra-ventricular drainage. Final clinical outcome was not statistically different between early therapeutic group who underwent operation within 24 hours after extra-ventricular drainage and delayed therapeutic group who underwent operation after 24 hours. (Fisher extract test, survival rate P=0.603, clinical outcome P=1.000).

Conclusion£ºPreoperative extra-ventricular drainage had additional risk of rebleeding, however, it provides immediate improvement of patient¡¯s neurological status and final clinical outcomes.

Å°¿öµå

¼ö¼úÀü ³ú½Ç ¿ÜºÎ ¹è¾×¼ú
Extra-ventricular drainage;Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage;Rebleeding

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸