비뇨기암에서의 면역관문 억제제의 치료 전략과 효능 및 안전성에 대한 리뷰
The Systematic Review of the Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor in Urological Cancers
황광용, 최세영, 장인호,
소속 상세정보
황광용 ( Hwang Gwang-Yong )
중앙대학교병원 비뇨기과
최세영 ( Choi Se-Young )
중앙대학교병원 비뇨기과
장인호 ( Chang In-Ho )
중앙대학교병원 비뇨기과
Abstract
To systematically review relevant literature on efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced and metastatic urothelial cell cancer (UCC), renal cell cancer (RCC), and prostate cancer. In platinum pretreated UCC, efficacy of pembrolizumab was superior to chemotherapy, with longer median overall survival (OS; 10.3 months vs. 7.4 months), a higher objective response rate (ORR; 21.1% vs. 11.4%, p=0.001), and a lower adverse event rate (60.9% vs. 90.2%). Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessed the safety and efficacy of nivolumab in advanced RCC. The median OS (25.0 months vs. 19.6 months) and the ORR (25% vs. 5%) were higher in patients treated with nivolumab compared with second-line everolimus. In patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, 2 RCTs were identified, which did not show significant benefits for ipilimumab over placebo. In UCC and RCC, there was no conclusive association between programmed cell death receptor ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in tumor tissue and clinical outcome during pembrolizumab and nivolumab treatment, respectively. Therefore, in metastatic UCC and RCC, pembrolizumab and nivolumab have superior efficacy and safety to second-line chemotherapy and everolimus, respectively. No beneficial effect of ipilimumab was observed in prostate cancer patients. PD-L1 expression status is currently not suitable as a predictive marker for treatment outcome.
키워드
Immune checkpoint inhibitors; Immunotherapy; Urological cancer
원문 및 링크아웃 정보
등재저널 정보