Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¸í»ç Ä£¼÷µµ¸¦ È°¿ëÇÑ ÀǹÌÀÚÁúÁßÀç°¡ Ãʱ⠾ËÃ÷ÇÏÀ̸Ӽº Ä¡¸Å³ëÀÎÀÇ À̸§´ë±â ´É·Â¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â È¿°ú The Effects of Semantic Feature Analysis Treatment on Naming Performance in Korean Individuals with Early Dementia of the Alzheimer¡¯s Type: Using a Familiarity of Nouns Scale

Communication Sciences & Disorders 2015³â 20±Ç 1È£ p.34 ~ 47
¸ð°æ¿Á, ¼ºÁöÀº, Á¤ÁöÇâ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¸ð°æ¿Á ( Mo Kyeong-Ok ) 
ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ¾ð¾îº´¸®Çаú

¼ºÁöÀº ( Sung Jee-Eun ) 
ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ¾ð¾îº´¸®Çаú
Á¤ÁöÇâ ( Jeong Jee-Hyang ) 
ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ½Å°æ°ú

Abstract

¹è°æ ¹× ¸ñÀû: Ãʱ⠾ËÃ÷ÇÏÀ̸Ӽº Ä¡¸Å(dementia of the Alzheimer¡¯s type, DAT)ȯÀÚ 6¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î Ä£¼÷µµ¸¦ È°¿ëÇÑ ÀǹÌÀÚÁú(semantic feature analysis, SFA)ÁßÀç°¡ ÁßÀç ¹× ºñÁßÀç ¸í»ç À̸§´ë±â, ±âŸ À̸§´ë±â, Ç¥ÁØÈ­µÈ ¾ð¾î ¹× ÀÎÁö°Ë»ç °úÁ¦¿¡¼­ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ÀÖ´ÂÁö »ìÆ캸¾Ò´Ù.

¹æ¹ý: 3¸íÀº ³ôÀº Ä£¼÷µµ ÁßÀç ÈÄ ³·Àº Ä£¼÷µµ ÁßÀ縦 ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´°í, ³ª¸ÓÁö´Â ³·Àº Ä£¼÷µµ ÁßÀ縦 ¸ÕÀú ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. SFA ÁßÀç´Â 1) 32°³ À̸§´ë±â ½Ç½Ã(16°³: ÁßÀç ¸í»ç, 16°³: ºñÁßÀç ¸í»ç), 2) ¹üÁÖ ³ª´©±â, 3) ÀǹÌÀÚÁú ¼±ÅÃ, 4) ¿¹/¾Æ´Ï¿ä Áú¹®, 5) À̸§´ë±â·Î ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú: ÁßÀç ¸í»ç¿Í ºñÁßÀç ¸í»ç À̸§´ë±â Á¤¹ÝÀÀ·üÀº Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´À¸³ª, ÁßÀç ¸í»ç¿¡¼­¸¸ Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÏ¿´´Ù. ³·Àº Ä£¼÷µµ ÁßÀç ÈÄ ³ôÀº Ä£¼÷µµ¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÑ Áý´ÜÀÇ Á¤¹ÝÀÀ·üÀº ³ô¾ÒÀ¸³ª, Áõ°¡ÆøÀº ³ôÀº Ä£¼÷µµ ÁßÀç ÈÄ ³·Àº Ä£¼÷µµ¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÑ Áý´ÜÀÌ ³ô¾Ò´Ù. »ý¼ºÀ̸§´ë±â Æò±Õ Á¡¼ö¿Í ¾ð¾î¡¤ÀÎÁö Æò°¡´Â À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ´Â ¾ø¾úÀ¸³ª, K-MMSE »çÈÄ Á¡¼ö´Â À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù.

³íÀÇ ¹× °á·Ð: SFA ÁßÀç°¡ DATÀÇ À̸§´ë±â ´É·Â¿¡ ±àÁ¤ÀûÀÎ ¿µÇâÀ» ÁÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸³ª, ÁßÀç ¸í»ç¿¡¸¸ ±¹ÇÑµÈ °á°úÀÌ¸ç ºñÁßÀç ¸í»ç·ÎÀÇ ÀϹÝÈ­´Â Á¦ÇÑÀûÀÌ´Ù. ÀϹÝÈ­¿¡´Â ÇÑ°è°¡ ÀÖÀ¸³ª, À̸§´ë±â Çâ»ó¿¡ ÀûÇÕÇÑ Ä£¼÷µµ ÁßÀç ¼ø¼­´Â ¡®°í¡æÀú¡¯ÀÎ °ÍÀ¸·Î º¸ÀδÙ. »ý¼ºÀ̸§´ë±â¿Í ¾ð¾î´É·Â¿¡ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø´Ù´Â Á¡Àº DAT°¡ ÅðÇ༺ ÁúȯÀ¸·Î ÀÎÁö´É·ÂÀº °¨ÅðµÇÁö¸¸, Ä£¼÷µµ¿¡ µû¸¥ SFA ÁßÀ縦 ½Ç½ÃÇÑ ¸í»ç¿¡´Â ±àÁ¤ÀûÀÎ È¿°ú¸¦ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î º¸¿©Áø´Ù.

Objectives: The purpose of the current study was to examine the effects and generalization effects of Semantic Feature Analysis (SFA) treatment using a familiarity of nouns scale with individuals who have early dementia of the Alzheimer¡¯s type (DAT).

Methods: Six individuals with early DAT participated in the study. Three individuals with DAT were treated with low familiarity items first then moved to high, whereas the other three began with high familiarity items first. The SFA treatment protocol consisted of 5 stages: 1) confrontation naming of 32 stimuli (16-treated, 16-untreated), 2) category sorting, 3) semantic feature selection, 4) yes/no questions, and 5) naming.

Results: There were significant improvements on treated items after SFA treatment; There were limited generalization effects on untreated items and other naming tasks. In terms of noun familiarity, the High-to-Low group seemed to have greater benefits than the Low-to-High group.

Conclusion: Individuals with DAT demonstrated significant increase in naming performance on treated items after SFA treatment using a familiarity of nouns scale. However, the treatment effects were not generalized to untreated noun exemplars and other linguistic-cognitive tasks. Furthermore, they showed significantly decreased performance on the K-MMSE, indicating that their disease had progressed. Despite their clear progress with DAT, it is interesting to note that they showed treatment effects on the treated items. Further studies are required to develop more diverse approaches to language treatments for individuals with neurodegenerative disease.

Å°¿öµå

¾ËÃ÷ÇÏÀ̸Ӽº Ä¡¸Å; ÀǹÌÀÚÁúÁßÀç; ¸í»ç Ä£¼÷µµ
Semantic feature analysis (SFA) treatment; Dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT); Familiarity of nouns

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI